Community-based program design - Revision history

GreenC bot: Rescued 1 archive link; reformat 1 link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20

2024-12-21T18:00:49Z

Rescued 1 archive link; reformat 1 link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20

← Previous revision		Revision as of 18:00, 21 December 2024
Line 33:		Line 33:

	=== Logic model ===		=== Logic model ===
	Another common tool of program design that can be employed is the [[logic model]]. Logic models are a graphical depiction of the logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program.<ref>{{Cite journal\|url=https://www.cals.uidaho.edu/edcomm/pdf/CIS/CIS1097.pdf\|title=The Logic Model for Program Planning and Evaluation\|last=McCawley\|first=Paul F.\|date=n.d.\|publisher=University of Idaho Extension\|page=1\|access-date=24 February 2014}}</ref> The underlying purpose of constructing a logic model is to assess how a program's activities will affect its outcomes. This model was first used as a tool to identify performance, but it has been adapted to program planning over time.<ref>{{cite web\|last1=Coffman\|first1=Julia\|title=Learning From Logic Models: An Example of a Family/School Partnership Program\|url=http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/learning-from-logic-models-an-example-of-a-family-school-partnership-program\|publisher=Harvard Family Research Project\|at=para. 3\|access-date=16 May 2017\|date=January 1999}}</ref>		Another common tool of program design that can be employed is the [[logic model]]. Logic models are a graphical depiction of the logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program.<ref>{{Cite journal\|url=https://www.cals.uidaho.edu/edcomm/pdf/CIS/CIS1097.pdf\|title=The Logic Model for Program Planning and Evaluation\|last=McCawley\|first=Paul F.\|date=n.d.\|publisher=University of Idaho Extension\|page=1\|access-date=24 February 2014}}</ref> The underlying purpose of constructing a logic model is to assess how a program's activities will affect its outcomes. This model was first used as a tool to identify performance, but it has been adapted to program planning over time.<ref>{{cite web\|last1=Coffman\|first1=Julia\|title=Learning From Logic Models: An Example of a Family/School Partnership Program\|url=http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/learning-from-logic-models-an-example-of-a-family-school-partnership-program\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090123042449/http://hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/learning-from-logic-models-an-example-of-a-family-school-partnership-program\|url-status=usurped\|archive-date=January 23, 2009\|publisher=Harvard Family Research Project\|at=para. 3\|access-date=16 May 2017\|date=January 1999}}</ref>

	=== Social action model ===		=== Social action model ===

Ooker: convert a listing as sentence to list

2022-08-18T08:24:16Z

convert a listing as sentence to list

← Previous revision		Revision as of 08:24, 18 August 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Similar to traditional program design, community-based program design often utilizes a range of tools and models which are meant to enhance the efficacy and outcomes of the program's design. The difference between traditional design and community-based design, when using these tools, is in the dynamics of the relationship between the designers, the participants, and the community as a whole. It evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]].		Similar to traditional program design, community-based program design often utilizes a range of tools and models which are meant to enhance the efficacy and outcomes of the program's design. The difference between traditional design and community-based design, when using these tools, is in the dynamics of the relationship between the designers, the participants, and the community as a whole. It evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]].

	One advantage is a learning experience between a consumer and a social services provider. One disadvantage is a limited availability of resources. The models that can be used for it are the [[Social ecological model\|social-ecological model]], which provides a framework for program design, the [[logic model]], which is a graphical depiction of logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program, the [[social action model]], whose objectives are to recognize the change around a community in order to preserve or improve standards, understand the social action process/model is a conceptualization of how directed change takes place, and understand how the social action model can be implemented as a successful community problem solving tool, and [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)\|program evaluation]], which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of community-based programs.		One advantage is a learning experience between a consumer and a social services provider. One disadvantage is a limited availability of resources. The models that can be used for it are:

			* the [[Social ecological model\|social-ecological model]], which provides a framework for program design,
			* the [[logic model]], which is a graphical depiction of logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program,
			* the [[social action model]], whose objectives are to recognize the change around a community in order to preserve or improve standards, understand the social action process/model is a conceptualization of how directed change takes place, and understand how the social action model can be implemented as a successful community problem solving tool,
			* and [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)\|program evaluation]], which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of community-based programs.

	== History ==		== History ==

Renamed user 6196787986447: /* top */clean up, typo(s) fixed: ’s → 's

2022-02-27T13:39:16Z

top: clean up, typo(s) fixed: ’s → 's

← Previous revision		Revision as of 13:39, 27 February 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''Community-based program design''' is a social method for designing programs that enables social service providers, organizers, designers and evaluators to serve specific communities in their own environment. This program design method depends on the participatory approach of community development often associated with [[community practice\|community-based social work]], and is often employed by [[Community organizing\|community organizations]].<ref name="Delgado">{{Cite book\|url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112481.001.0001/acprof-9780195112481\|title=Social Work Practice in Nontraditional Urban Settings\|last=Delgado\|first=Melvin\|language=en\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|isbn=9780195112481\|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112481.001.0001\|year=1999}}</ref> From this approach, program designers assess the needs and resources existing within a community, and, involving community stakeholders in the process, attempt to create a sustainable and equitable solution to address the community's needs.		'''Community-based program design''' is a social method for designing programs that enables social service providers, organizers, designers and evaluators to serve specific communities in their own environment. This program design method depends on the participatory approach of community development often associated with [[community practice\|community-based social work]], and is often employed by [[Community organizing\|community organizations]].<ref name="Delgado">{{Cite book\|url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112481.001.0001/acprof-9780195112481\|title=Social Work Practice in Nontraditional Urban Settings\|last=Delgado\|first=Melvin\|language=en\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|isbn=9780195112481\|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112481.001.0001\|year=1999}}</ref> From this approach, program designers assess the needs and resources existing within a community, and, involving community stakeholders in the process, attempt to create a sustainable and equitable solution to address the community's needs.

	Similar to traditional program design, community-based program design often utilizes a range of tools and models which are meant to enhance the efficacy and outcomes of the ~~program’s~~ design. The difference between traditional design and community-based design, when using these tools, is in the dynamics of the relationship between the designers, the participants, and the community as a whole. It evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]].		Similar to traditional program design, community-based program design often utilizes a range of tools and models which are meant to enhance the efficacy and outcomes of the program's design. The difference between traditional design and community-based design, when using these tools, is in the dynamics of the relationship between the designers, the participants, and the community as a whole. It evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]].

	One advantage is a learning experience between a consumer and a social services provider. One disadvantage is a limited availability of resources. The models that can be used for it are the [[Social ecological model\|social-ecological model]], which provides a framework for program design, the [[logic model]], which is a graphical depiction of logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program, the [[social action model]], whose objectives are to recognize the change around a community in order to preserve or improve standards, understand the social action process/model is a conceptualization of how directed change takes place, and understand how the social action model can be implemented as a successful community problem solving tool, and [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)\|program evaluation]], which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of community-based programs.		One advantage is a learning experience between a consumer and a social services provider. One disadvantage is a limited availability of resources. The models that can be used for it are the [[Social ecological model\|social-ecological model]], which provides a framework for program design, the [[logic model]], which is a graphical depiction of logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program, the [[social action model]], whose objectives are to recognize the change around a community in order to preserve or improve standards, understand the social action process/model is a conceptualization of how directed change takes place, and understand how the social action model can be implemented as a successful community problem solving tool, and [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)\|program evaluation]], which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of community-based programs.

Tom.Reding: Fix 1 auth/ed/transl punctuation; WP:GenFixes on

2021-01-15T14:22:53Z

Fix 1 auth/ed/transl punctuation; WP:GenFixes on

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:22, 15 January 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Community practice in social work is linked with the historical roots of the [[History of social work\|profession's beginning]] in the United States. More specifically, the history of community-based social work has evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]]. However, during the earlier half of the 20th century, much of this work targeted the mentally ill and focused on [[Institutionalisation#The mentally ill\|institutionalization]]. Not until the 1960s did the shift from institutions to communities, known as deinstitutionalization,<ref>{{Cite book\|url=https://www.pearsonhighered.com/program/Tausig-Sociology-of-Mental-Illness-A-2nd-Edition/PGM118073.html\|title=A sociology of mental illness\|last1=Tausig\|first1=Mark\|last2=Janet\|first2=Michello\|last3=Sree\|first3=Subedi\|date=2004\|publisher=Pearson\|page=188\|isbn=9780131114784\|oclc=636608234}}</ref> increase the emphasis on community-based program design. Community-based organizations and community-based programs burgeoned because of this. The poor conditions of mental health institutions and an increasing amount of research that illustrated the benefits of maintaining the relationships of the individuals served within the community surfaced to further the growth of community-based programs.		Community practice in social work is linked with the historical roots of the [[History of social work\|profession's beginning]] in the United States. More specifically, the history of community-based social work has evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]]. However, during the earlier half of the 20th century, much of this work targeted the mentally ill and focused on [[Institutionalisation#The mentally ill\|institutionalization]]. Not until the 1960s did the shift from institutions to communities, known as deinstitutionalization,<ref>{{Cite book\|url=https://www.pearsonhighered.com/program/Tausig-Sociology-of-Mental-Illness-A-2nd-Edition/PGM118073.html\|title=A sociology of mental illness\|last1=Tausig\|first1=Mark\|last2=Janet\|first2=Michello\|last3=Sree\|first3=Subedi\|date=2004\|publisher=Pearson\|page=188\|isbn=9780131114784\|oclc=636608234}}</ref> increase the emphasis on community-based program design. Community-based organizations and community-based programs burgeoned because of this. The poor conditions of mental health institutions and an increasing amount of research that illustrated the benefits of maintaining the relationships of the individuals served within the community surfaced to further the growth of community-based programs.

	Although social work has been historically defined by these institutionalized and deinstitutionalized periods, informal community design programs have always existed. In fact, informal community-based programs predate human service applications of this approach.<ref name="Delgado" /> In 1990, Bernice Harper illustrated this point in the book ''Social Work Practice with Black Families: A Culturally Specific Perspective'' in regards to [[African Americans\|African American]] communities, by writing that: <blockquote>Blacks have always cared for the sick at home, yet it was never labeled 'home care.' Blacks have been dying at home and receiving care in the process, yet it was never called 'hospice care.' Blacks have relieved each other from the caring and curing processes, yet it was never seen as 'respite care.' Blacks have cared for each other in their homes, in their neighborhoods, and throughout their communities, yet it was never referred to as 'volunteerism.'<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia\|title=Blacks and the health care delivery system : challenges and prospects\|last=Harper\|first=Bernice Catherine O.\|encyclopedia=Social work practice with Black families: a culturally specific perspective\|editor-last=Logan\|editor-first=Sadye Louise\|editor-last2=Freeman\|editor-first2=Edith M\|editor-last3=McRoy\|editor-first3=Ruth G\|year=1990\|publisher=Longman\|isbn=978-0801300127\|location=New York\|language=en\|oclc = 18909442}}</ref></blockquote>		Although social work has been historically defined by these institutionalized and deinstitutionalized periods, informal community design programs have always existed. In fact, informal community-based programs predate human service applications of this approach.<ref name="Delgado" /> In 1990, Bernice Harper illustrated this point in the book ''Social Work Practice with Black Families: A Culturally Specific Perspective'' in regards to [[African Americans\|African American]] communities, by writing that: <blockquote>Blacks have always cared for the sick at home, yet it was never labeled 'home care.' Blacks have been dying at home and receiving care in the process, yet it was never called 'hospice care.' Blacks have relieved each other from the caring and curing processes, yet it was never seen as 'respite care.' Blacks have cared for each other in their homes, in their neighborhoods, and throughout their communities, yet it was never referred to as 'volunteerism.'<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia\|title=Blacks and the health care delivery system : challenges and prospects\|last=Harper\|first=Bernice Catherine O\|encyclopedia=Social work practice with Black families: a culturally specific perspective\|editor-last=Logan\|editor-first=Sadye Louise\|editor-last2=Freeman\|editor-first2=Edith M\|editor-last3=McRoy\|editor-first3=Ruth G\|year=1990\|publisher=Longman\|isbn=978-0801300127\|location=New York\|language=en\|oclc = 18909442}}</ref></blockquote>

	== Advantages and challenges ==		== Advantages and challenges ==
Line 48:		Line 48:

	== References ==		== References ==
	{{~~reflist~~\|30em}}		{{Reflist\|30em}}

	[[Category:Community organizing]]		[[Category:Community organizing]]

BattyBot: /* Anthropological Model */Fixed CS1 errors: dates and general fixes

2021-01-12T05:02:46Z

Anthropological Model: Fixed CS1 errors: dates and general fixes

← Previous revision		Revision as of 05:02, 12 January 2021
Line 39:		Line 39:
	The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|doi=10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|year=2009\|last1=Schensul\|first1=Jean J.\|last2=Trickett\|first2=Edison\|journal=American Journal of Community Psychology\|volume=43\|issue=3–4\|pages=232–240\|pmid=19387821\|s2cid=154037}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite journal\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots \|doi=10.7554/elife.30860.037\|doi-access=free}}</ref>		The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|doi=10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|year=2009\|last1=Schensul\|first1=Jean J.\|last2=Trickett\|first2=Edison\|journal=American Journal of Community Psychology\|volume=43\|issue=3–4\|pages=232–240\|pmid=19387821\|s2cid=154037}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite journal\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots \|doi=10.7554/elife.30860.037\|doi-access=free}}</ref>

	An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23~~/2012~~\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=10/31~~/2020~~\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />		An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=2012-10-23\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=2020-10-31\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />

	== See also ==		== See also ==

OAbot: Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.

2021-01-02T12:25:41Z

Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:25, 2 January 2021
Line 37:		Line 37:

	== Anthropological Model ==		== Anthropological Model ==
	The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|doi=10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|year=2009\|last1=Schensul\|first1=Jean J.\|last2=Trickett\|first2=Edison\|journal=American Journal of Community Psychology\|volume=43\|issue=3–4\|pages=232–240\|pmid=19387821\|s2cid=154037}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite journal\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots \|doi=10.7554/elife.30860.037}}</ref>		The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|doi=10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|year=2009\|last1=Schensul\|first1=Jean J.\|last2=Trickett\|first2=Edison\|journal=American Journal of Community Psychology\|volume=43\|issue=3–4\|pages=232–240\|pmid=19387821\|s2cid=154037}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite journal\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots \|doi=10.7554/elife.30860.037\|doi-access=free}}</ref>

	An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />		An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />

Citation bot: Add: pmid, pages, issue, volume, journal, year, title, s2cid, author pars. 1-2. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Headbomb | via #UCB_toolbar

2020-12-14T05:47:41Z

Add: pmid, pages, issue, volume, journal, year, title, s2cid, author pars. 1-2. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Headbomb | via #UCB_toolbar

← Previous revision		Revision as of 05:47, 14 December 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== History ==		== History ==
	{{Further\|Deinstitutionalization}}		{{Further\|Deinstitutionalization}}
	Community practice in social work is linked with the historical roots of the [[History of social work\|profession's beginning]] in the United States. More specifically, the history of community-based social work has evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]]. However, during the earlier half of the 20th century, much of this work targeted the mentally ill and focused on [[Institutionalisation#The mentally ill\|institutionalization]]. Not until the 1960s did the shift from institutions to communities, known as deinstitutionalization,<ref>{{Cite book\|url=https://www.pearsonhighered.com/program/Tausig-Sociology-of-Mental-Illness-A-2nd-Edition/PGM118073.html\|title=A sociology of mental illness\|~~last~~=Tausig\|~~first~~=Mark\|last2=Janet\|first2=Michello\|last3=Sree\|first3=Subedi\|date=2004\|publisher=Pearson\|page=188\|isbn=9780131114784\|oclc=636608234}}</ref> increase the emphasis on community-based program design. Community-based organizations and community-based programs burgeoned because of this. The poor conditions of mental health institutions and an increasing amount of research that illustrated the benefits of maintaining the relationships of the individuals served within the community surfaced to further the growth of community-based programs.		Community practice in social work is linked with the historical roots of the [[History of social work\|profession's beginning]] in the United States. More specifically, the history of community-based social work has evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]]. However, during the earlier half of the 20th century, much of this work targeted the mentally ill and focused on [[Institutionalisation#The mentally ill\|institutionalization]]. Not until the 1960s did the shift from institutions to communities, known as deinstitutionalization,<ref>{{Cite book\|url=https://www.pearsonhighered.com/program/Tausig-Sociology-of-Mental-Illness-A-2nd-Edition/PGM118073.html\|title=A sociology of mental illness\|last1=Tausig\|first1=Mark\|last2=Janet\|first2=Michello\|last3=Sree\|first3=Subedi\|date=2004\|publisher=Pearson\|page=188\|isbn=9780131114784\|oclc=636608234}}</ref> increase the emphasis on community-based program design. Community-based organizations and community-based programs burgeoned because of this. The poor conditions of mental health institutions and an increasing amount of research that illustrated the benefits of maintaining the relationships of the individuals served within the community surfaced to further the growth of community-based programs.

	Although social work has been historically defined by these institutionalized and deinstitutionalized periods, informal community design programs have always existed. In fact, informal community-based programs predate human service applications of this approach.<ref name="Delgado" /> In 1990, Bernice Harper illustrated this point in the book ''Social Work Practice with Black Families: A Culturally Specific Perspective'' in regards to [[African Americans\|African American]] communities, by writing that: <blockquote>Blacks have always cared for the sick at home, yet it was never labeled 'home care.' Blacks have been dying at home and receiving care in the process, yet it was never called 'hospice care.' Blacks have relieved each other from the caring and curing processes, yet it was never seen as 'respite care.' Blacks have cared for each other in their homes, in their neighborhoods, and throughout their communities, yet it was never referred to as 'volunteerism.'<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia\|title=Blacks and the health care delivery system : challenges and prospects\|last=Harper\|first=Bernice Catherine O.\|encyclopedia=Social work practice with Black families: a culturally specific perspective\|editor-last=Logan\|editor-first=Sadye Louise\|editor-last2=Freeman\|editor-first2=Edith M\|editor-last3=McRoy\|editor-first3=Ruth G\|year=1990\|publisher=Longman\|isbn=978-0801300127\|location=New York\|language=en\|oclc = 18909442}}</ref></blockquote>		Although social work has been historically defined by these institutionalized and deinstitutionalized periods, informal community design programs have always existed. In fact, informal community-based programs predate human service applications of this approach.<ref name="Delgado" /> In 1990, Bernice Harper illustrated this point in the book ''Social Work Practice with Black Families: A Culturally Specific Perspective'' in regards to [[African Americans\|African American]] communities, by writing that: <blockquote>Blacks have always cared for the sick at home, yet it was never labeled 'home care.' Blacks have been dying at home and receiving care in the process, yet it was never called 'hospice care.' Blacks have relieved each other from the caring and curing processes, yet it was never seen as 'respite care.' Blacks have cared for each other in their homes, in their neighborhoods, and throughout their communities, yet it was never referred to as 'volunteerism.'<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia\|title=Blacks and the health care delivery system : challenges and prospects\|last=Harper\|first=Bernice Catherine O.\|encyclopedia=Social work practice with Black families: a culturally specific perspective\|editor-last=Logan\|editor-first=Sadye Louise\|editor-last2=Freeman\|editor-first2=Edith M\|editor-last3=McRoy\|editor-first3=Ruth G\|year=1990\|publisher=Longman\|isbn=978-0801300127\|location=New York\|language=en\|oclc = 18909442}}</ref></blockquote>
Line 16:		Line 16:

	=== Advantages ===		=== Advantages ===
	Benefits of community-based program design include gaining insight into the social context of an issue or problem, mutual learning experiences between consumer and provider, broadening understanding of professional roles and responsibilities within the community, interaction with professionals from other disciplines, and opportunities for [[community-based participatory research]] projects.<ref name="Advantage">{{Cite journal\|~~last~~=Mudarikwa\|~~first~~=Ruvimbo Sharon\|last2=Mcdonnell\|first2=Jacqueline A.\|last3=Whyte\|first3=Susan\|last4=Villanueva\|first4=Elmer\|last5=Hill\|first5=Robyn A.\|last6=Hart\|first6=William\|last7=Nestel\|first7=Debra\|date=2010-12-01\|title=Community-based practice program in a rural medical school: Benefits and challenges\|journal=Medical Teacher\|volume=32\|issue=12\|pages=990–996\|doi=10.3109/0142159X.2010.509417\|pmid=20874029\|issn=0142-159X}}</ref> Increased [[sustainability]] is an advantage of community-based program design. The program sustainability is ensured by the identification of solutions to problems based on existing resources accessible to all community members. Also, the involvement of local community leaders and local volunteers reinforce the sustainability of the impact of the program.<ref>{{Cite journal\|~~last~~=M\|~~first~~=Sternin\|last2=J\|first2=Sternin\|last3=D\|first3=Marsh\|date=1998\|publisher=[[Save the Children]]\|title=Designing a community-based nutrition program using the hearth model and the positive deviance approach: A field guide.\|page=17\|url=https://ovcsupport.org/wp-content/uploads/Documents/Designing_a_Community_Based_Nutrition_Program_Using_the_Hearth_Model_and_the_Positive_Deviance_Approach_A_Field_Guide_1.pdf\|language=en}}</ref>		Benefits of community-based program design include gaining insight into the social context of an issue or problem, mutual learning experiences between consumer and provider, broadening understanding of professional roles and responsibilities within the community, interaction with professionals from other disciplines, and opportunities for [[community-based participatory research]] projects.<ref name="Advantage">{{Cite journal\|last1=Mudarikwa\|first1=Ruvimbo Sharon\|last2=Mcdonnell\|first2=Jacqueline A.\|last3=Whyte\|first3=Susan\|last4=Villanueva\|first4=Elmer\|last5=Hill\|first5=Robyn A.\|last6=Hart\|first6=William\|last7=Nestel\|first7=Debra\|date=2010-12-01\|title=Community-based practice program in a rural medical school: Benefits and challenges\|journal=Medical Teacher\|volume=32\|issue=12\|pages=990–996\|doi=10.3109/0142159X.2010.509417\|pmid=20874029\|s2cid=28904608\|issn=0142-159X}}</ref> Increased [[sustainability]] is an advantage of community-based program design. The program sustainability is ensured by the identification of solutions to problems based on existing resources accessible to all community members. Also, the involvement of local community leaders and local volunteers reinforce the sustainability of the impact of the program.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=M\|first1=Sternin\|last2=J\|first2=Sternin\|last3=D\|first3=Marsh\|date=1998\|publisher=[[Save the Children]]\|title=Designing a community-based nutrition program using the hearth model and the positive deviance approach: A field guide.\|page=17\|url=https://ovcsupport.org/wp-content/uploads/Documents/Designing_a_Community_Based_Nutrition_Program_Using_the_Hearth_Model_and_the_Positive_Deviance_Approach_A_Field_Guide_1.pdf\|language=en}}</ref>

	=== Challenges ===		=== Challenges ===
	Some challenges of community-based program design are the limited availability of resources, propensity for high levels of staff turnover, the reliance upon unpaid volunteers, participant retention, and the evaluation of a dynamic task environment.<ref>{{Cite journal\|~~last~~=O'Neil\|~~first~~=Margaret E.\|last2=Fragala-Pinkham\|first2=Maria\|last3=Ideishi\|first3=Roger I.\|last4=Ideishi\|first4=Siobhan K.\|date=2012-05-01\|title=Community-based programs for children and youth: our experiences in design, implementation, and evaluation\|journal=Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\|volume=32\|issue=2\|pages=111–119\|doi=10.3109/01942638.2012.668089\|issn=1541-3144\|pmid=22483374}}</ref> For the same reasons that sustainability is an advantage of this approach, utilizing limited available resources is a challenge. Based on [[free market]] principals and resource scarcity, programs often operate below [[pareto efficiency]].<ref>{{Cite book\|url=https://cup.columbia.edu/book/economics-for-social-workers/9780231116879\|title=Economics for social workers : the application of economic theory to social policy and the human services\|~~last~~=Lewis\|~~first~~=Michael Anthony\|last2=Karl\|first2=Widerquist\|date=2002\|publisher=Columbia University Press\|isbn=9780231116862\|oclc=47805132}}</ref>		Some challenges of community-based program design are the limited availability of resources, propensity for high levels of staff turnover, the reliance upon unpaid volunteers, participant retention, and the evaluation of a dynamic task environment.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=O'Neil\|first1=Margaret E.\|last2=Fragala-Pinkham\|first2=Maria\|last3=Ideishi\|first3=Roger I.\|last4=Ideishi\|first4=Siobhan K.\|date=2012-05-01\|title=Community-based programs for children and youth: our experiences in design, implementation, and evaluation\|journal=Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\|volume=32\|issue=2\|pages=111–119\|doi=10.3109/01942638.2012.668089\|issn=1541-3144\|pmid=22483374\|s2cid=41033620}}</ref> For the same reasons that sustainability is an advantage of this approach, utilizing limited available resources is a challenge. Based on [[free market]] principals and resource scarcity, programs often operate below [[pareto efficiency]].<ref>{{Cite book\|url=https://cup.columbia.edu/book/economics-for-social-workers/9780231116879\|title=Economics for social workers : the application of economic theory to social policy and the human services\|last1=Lewis\|first1=Michael Anthony\|last2=Karl\|first2=Widerquist\|date=2002\|publisher=Columbia University Press\|isbn=9780231116862\|oclc=47805132}}</ref>

	== Program design tools ==		== Program design tools ==
Line 37:		Line 37:

	== Anthropological Model ==		== Anthropological Model ==
	The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|doi=10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite journal\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots \|doi=10.7554/elife.30860.037}}</ref>		The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|doi=10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|year=2009\|last1=Schensul\|first1=Jean J.\|last2=Trickett\|first2=Edison\|journal=American Journal of Community Psychology\|volume=43\|issue=3–4\|pages=232–240\|pmid=19387821\|s2cid=154037}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite journal\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots \|doi=10.7554/elife.30860.037}}</ref>

	An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />		An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />

Headbomb: pre-bot

2020-12-14T05:26:51Z

pre-bot

← Previous revision		Revision as of 05:26, 14 December 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:

	== Anthropological Model ==		== Anthropological Model ==
	The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|~~last~~=~~Schensul\|first=Jean\|date=4~~/~~22/2009\|title=Introduction to Multi~~-~~Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|url=file:///Users/youthcommunityservice/Downloads/Schensul~~-~~Trickett2009_Article_IntroductionToMulti~~-~~LevelCommu.pdf\|journal=Springer Science + Business Media\|pages=232~~}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite ~~web~~\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots ~~(.pdf)~~\|~~url~~=~~http://dx.doi.org/~~10.7554/elife.30860.037~~\|access-date=2020-11-21\|website=dx.doi.org~~}}</ref>		The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|doi=10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite journal\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots \|doi=10.7554/elife.30860.037}}</ref>

	An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />		An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />

Monkbot: Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 15 templates: del empty params (4×); hyphenate params (4×); del |url-status= (1×); cvt lang vals (1×);

2020-12-12T12:58:18Z

Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 15 templates: del empty params (4×); hyphenate params (4×); del |url-status= (1×); cvt lang vals (1×);

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:58, 12 December 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Community practice in social work is linked with the historical roots of the [[History of social work\|profession's beginning]] in the United States. More specifically, the history of community-based social work has evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]]. However, during the earlier half of the 20th century, much of this work targeted the mentally ill and focused on [[Institutionalisation#The mentally ill\|institutionalization]]. Not until the 1960s did the shift from institutions to communities, known as deinstitutionalization,<ref>{{Cite book\|url=https://www.pearsonhighered.com/program/Tausig-Sociology-of-Mental-Illness-A-2nd-Edition/PGM118073.html\|title=A sociology of mental illness\|last=Tausig\|first=Mark\|last2=Janet\|first2=Michello\|last3=Sree\|first3=Subedi\|date=2004\|publisher=Pearson\|page=188\|isbn=9780131114784\|oclc=636608234}}</ref> increase the emphasis on community-based program design. Community-based organizations and community-based programs burgeoned because of this. The poor conditions of mental health institutions and an increasing amount of research that illustrated the benefits of maintaining the relationships of the individuals served within the community surfaced to further the growth of community-based programs.		Community practice in social work is linked with the historical roots of the [[History of social work\|profession's beginning]] in the United States. More specifically, the history of community-based social work has evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]]. However, during the earlier half of the 20th century, much of this work targeted the mentally ill and focused on [[Institutionalisation#The mentally ill\|institutionalization]]. Not until the 1960s did the shift from institutions to communities, known as deinstitutionalization,<ref>{{Cite book\|url=https://www.pearsonhighered.com/program/Tausig-Sociology-of-Mental-Illness-A-2nd-Edition/PGM118073.html\|title=A sociology of mental illness\|last=Tausig\|first=Mark\|last2=Janet\|first2=Michello\|last3=Sree\|first3=Subedi\|date=2004\|publisher=Pearson\|page=188\|isbn=9780131114784\|oclc=636608234}}</ref> increase the emphasis on community-based program design. Community-based organizations and community-based programs burgeoned because of this. The poor conditions of mental health institutions and an increasing amount of research that illustrated the benefits of maintaining the relationships of the individuals served within the community surfaced to further the growth of community-based programs.

	Although social work has been historically defined by these institutionalized and deinstitutionalized periods, informal community design programs have always existed. In fact, informal community-based programs predate human service applications of this approach.<ref name="Delgado" /> In 1990, Bernice Harper illustrated this point in the book ''Social Work Practice with Black Families: A Culturally Specific Perspective'' in regards to [[African Americans\|African American]] communities, by writing that: <blockquote>Blacks have always cared for the sick at home, yet it was never labeled 'home care.' Blacks have been dying at home and receiving care in the process, yet it was never called 'hospice care.' Blacks have relieved each other from the caring and curing processes, yet it was never seen as 'respite care.' Blacks have cared for each other in their homes, in their neighborhoods, and throughout their communities, yet it was never referred to as 'volunteerism.'<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia\|title=Blacks and the health care delivery system : challenges and prospects\|last=Harper\|first=Bernice Catherine O.\|encyclopedia=Social work practice with Black families: a culturally specific perspective\|editor-last=Logan\|editor-first=Sadye Louise\|editor-last2=Freeman\|editor-first2=Edith M\|editor-last3=McRoy\|editor-first3=Ruth G\|year=1990\|publisher=Longman\|isbn=978-0801300127\|location=New York\|language=~~English~~\|oclc = 18909442}}</ref></blockquote>		Although social work has been historically defined by these institutionalized and deinstitutionalized periods, informal community design programs have always existed. In fact, informal community-based programs predate human service applications of this approach.<ref name="Delgado" /> In 1990, Bernice Harper illustrated this point in the book ''Social Work Practice with Black Families: A Culturally Specific Perspective'' in regards to [[African Americans\|African American]] communities, by writing that: <blockquote>Blacks have always cared for the sick at home, yet it was never labeled 'home care.' Blacks have been dying at home and receiving care in the process, yet it was never called 'hospice care.' Blacks have relieved each other from the caring and curing processes, yet it was never seen as 'respite care.' Blacks have cared for each other in their homes, in their neighborhoods, and throughout their communities, yet it was never referred to as 'volunteerism.'<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia\|title=Blacks and the health care delivery system : challenges and prospects\|last=Harper\|first=Bernice Catherine O.\|encyclopedia=Social work practice with Black families: a culturally specific perspective\|editor-last=Logan\|editor-first=Sadye Louise\|editor-last2=Freeman\|editor-first2=Edith M\|editor-last3=McRoy\|editor-first3=Ruth G\|year=1990\|publisher=Longman\|isbn=978-0801300127\|location=New York\|language=en\|oclc = 18909442}}</ref></blockquote>

	== Advantages and challenges ==		== Advantages and challenges ==
Line 25:		Line 25:

	=== Socio-ecological model ===		=== Socio-ecological model ===
	One model for program design is the [[Ecosystem model\|socio-ecological model]]. This model enables an understanding of the factors that can influence a community. It demonstrates five levels of influence, which are the individual/intrapersonal, the interpersonal, the organizational/institutional, the community, and the policy.<ref>{{cite web\|author1=Healthy Teen Network\|title=Increasing Our Impact by Using a Social-Ecological Approach\|url=http://www.healthyteennetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/TipSheet_IncreasingOurImpactUsingSocial-EcologicalApproach.pdf\|pages=1, 2–3\|~~accessdate~~=10 May 2017\|date=March 2015}}</ref>		One model for program design is the [[Ecosystem model\|socio-ecological model]]. This model enables an understanding of the factors that can influence a community. It demonstrates five levels of influence, which are the individual/intrapersonal, the interpersonal, the organizational/institutional, the community, and the policy.<ref>{{cite web\|author1=Healthy Teen Network\|title=Increasing Our Impact by Using a Social-Ecological Approach\|url=http://www.healthyteennetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/TipSheet_IncreasingOurImpactUsingSocial-EcologicalApproach.pdf\|pages=1, 2–3\|access-date=10 May 2017\|date=March 2015}}</ref>

	=== Logic model ===		=== Logic model ===
	Another common tool of program design that can be employed is the [[logic model]]. Logic models are a graphical depiction of the logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program.<ref>{{Cite journal\|url=https://www.cals.uidaho.edu/edcomm/pdf/CIS/CIS1097.pdf\|title=The Logic Model for Program Planning and Evaluation\|last=McCawley\|first=Paul F.\|date=n.d.\|publisher=University of Idaho Extension\|page=1\|~~accessdate~~=24 February 2014}}</ref> The underlying purpose of constructing a logic model is to assess how a program's activities will affect its outcomes. This model was first used as a tool to identify performance, but it has been adapted to program planning over time.<ref>{{cite web\|last1=Coffman\|first1=Julia\|title=Learning From Logic Models: An Example of a Family/School Partnership Program\|url=http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/learning-from-logic-models-an-example-of-a-family-school-partnership-program\|publisher=Harvard Family Research Project\|at=para. 3\|~~accessdate~~=16 May 2017\|date=January 1999}}</ref>		Another common tool of program design that can be employed is the [[logic model]]. Logic models are a graphical depiction of the logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program.<ref>{{Cite journal\|url=https://www.cals.uidaho.edu/edcomm/pdf/CIS/CIS1097.pdf\|title=The Logic Model for Program Planning and Evaluation\|last=McCawley\|first=Paul F.\|date=n.d.\|publisher=University of Idaho Extension\|page=1\|access-date=24 February 2014}}</ref> The underlying purpose of constructing a logic model is to assess how a program's activities will affect its outcomes. This model was first used as a tool to identify performance, but it has been adapted to program planning over time.<ref>{{cite web\|last1=Coffman\|first1=Julia\|title=Learning From Logic Models: An Example of a Family/School Partnership Program\|url=http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/learning-from-logic-models-an-example-of-a-family-school-partnership-program\|publisher=Harvard Family Research Project\|at=para. 3\|access-date=16 May 2017\|date=January 1999}}</ref>

	=== Social action model ===		=== Social action model ===
Line 34:		Line 34:

	=== Evaluation ===		=== Evaluation ===
	An emerging and growing practice of program design is [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)\|program evaluation]]. Evaluation can be seen as a cycle which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of a community-based program by collecting data from it, reviewing the data, changing the program as the data recommends, and then collecting data again. Program designers often choose to incorporate evaluation into design in order to check program processes, determine impact, build a base of support, and/or justify replication/expansion.<ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://www2.aap.org/commpeds/htpcp/EvalGuide2.pdf\|title=Evaluating your community-based program\|date=2013\|publisher=American Academy of Pediatrics\|page=7\|~~accessdate~~=May 9, 2017\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160626230841/http://www2.aap.org/commpeds/htpcp/EvalGuide2.pdf\|archive-date=June 26, 2016\|url-status=dead}}</ref>		An emerging and growing practice of program design is [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)\|program evaluation]]. Evaluation can be seen as a cycle which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of a community-based program by collecting data from it, reviewing the data, changing the program as the data recommends, and then collecting data again. Program designers often choose to incorporate evaluation into design in order to check program processes, determine impact, build a base of support, and/or justify replication/expansion.<ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://www2.aap.org/commpeds/htpcp/EvalGuide2.pdf\|title=Evaluating your community-based program\|date=2013\|publisher=American Academy of Pediatrics\|page=7\|access-date=May 9, 2017\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160626230841/http://www2.aap.org/commpeds/htpcp/EvalGuide2.pdf\|archive-date=June 26, 2016\|url-status=dead}}</ref>

	== Anthropological Model ==		== Anthropological Model ==
	The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|last=Schensul\|first=Jean\|date=4/22/2009\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|url=file:///Users/youthcommunityservice/Downloads/Schensul-Trickett2009_Article_IntroductionToMulti-LevelCommu.pdf\|journal=Springer Science + Business Media~~\|volume=~~\|pages=232~~\|via=~~}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite web\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots (.pdf)\|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30860.037\|access-date=2020-11-21\|website=dx.doi.org}}</ref>		The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|last=Schensul\|first=Jean\|date=4/22/2009\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|url=file:///Users/youthcommunityservice/Downloads/Schensul-Trickett2009_Article_IntroductionToMulti-LevelCommu.pdf\|journal=Springer Science + Business Media\|pages=232}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite web\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots (.pdf)\|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30860.037\|access-date=2020-11-21\|website=dx.doi.org}}</ref>

	An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat~~\|url-status=live\|archive-url=\|archive-date=~~\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />		An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Caveman1989: Added content and cited source.

2020-11-21T23:23:55Z

Added content and cited source.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:23, 21 November 2020
Line 39:		Line 39:
	The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|last=Schensul\|first=Jean\|date=4/22/2009\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|url=file:///Users/youthcommunityservice/Downloads/Schensul-Trickett2009_Article_IntroductionToMulti-LevelCommu.pdf\|journal=Springer Science + Business Media\|volume=\|pages=232\|via=}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite web\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots (.pdf)\|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30860.037\|access-date=2020-11-21\|website=dx.doi.org}}</ref>		The community-based program design is a method utilized in the field of applied anthropology. In the mid to late 20th century, anthropologists focusing on research program design discovered that excluding the desire, input, and commitment of local communities and people (for which problems were being attempted to be solved) would be unsuccessful and unsustainable without some type of community-based methodology.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal\|last=Schensul\|first=Jean\|date=4/22/2009\|title=Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions\|url=file:///Users/youthcommunityservice/Downloads/Schensul-Trickett2009_Article_IntroductionToMulti-LevelCommu.pdf\|journal=Springer Science + Business Media\|volume=\|pages=232\|via=}}</ref> Additionally, there are examples, from the past 20 years, of social scientists like anthropologists utilizing collaborative strategies with the communities that they research and study to introduce ideas that can enact change at the individual level and even on a global scale.<ref name=":02" /> Applied anthropologists use the community-based model to help indigenous groups recognize and construct their individualized "theories of need and change" and even help these groups accumulate the various forms of capital required to address those needs, including financial resources, and political support.<ref name=":02" /> When conducting community-based research, it is imperative that an anthropologist establish a definition of the community they will be working with by identifying the community members and stakeholders of such said community and provide justification or clear reasoning for the defined community group.<ref>{{Cite web\|title=Supplementary file 14. Differential isoform usage plots (.pdf)\|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30860.037\|access-date=2020-11-21\|website=dx.doi.org}}</ref>

	An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|url-status=live\|archive-url=\|archive-date=\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref>		An example of the anthropological model can be found within the field of [[medical anthropology]] and the work conducted by medical anthropologist [[Paul Farmer]]. In 1998, Farmer and his colleagues developed a community-based model of care in order to provide free and comprehensive HIV treatment in impoverished areas of Haiti. The winning key strategy that Farmer and his contemporaries developed out of the community-based model was the use of community health workers, who would check on patients at their own homes to make sure patients were taking their medications correctly and regularly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web\|last=Chu\|first=Louise\|date=10/23/2012\|title=Global Health Pioneer Paul Farmer Touts Community-Based Health Care Model to Combat Infectious Diseases\|url=https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12984/global-health-pioneer-paul-farmer-touts-community-based-health-care-model-combat\|url-status=live\|archive-url=\|archive-date=\|access-date=10/31/2020\|website=UCSF.edu}}</ref> Due to Paul Farmer's success of the medical community-based program design in Haiti, Farmer and his colleagues were invited to duplicate their efforts in Lima, Peru in order to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis; and, subsequently, the Clinton Foundation leaned on Farmer's organization Partners in Health to support medical efforts in the government of Rwanda. Partners in Health was able to rebuild the government's local infrastructure by building new hospitals and health centers and introduced low-cost medicines and therapies through the use of community health workers.<ref name=":1" />

	== See also ==		== See also ==

← Previous revision		Revision as of 13:39, 27 February 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''Community-based program design''' is a social method for designing programs that enables social service providers, organizers, designers and evaluators to serve specific communities in their own environment. This program design method depends on the participatory approach of community development often associated with [[community practice\|community-based social work]], and is often employed by [[Community organizing\|community organizations]].<ref name="Delgado">{{Cite book\|url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112481.001.0001/acprof-9780195112481\|title=Social Work Practice in Nontraditional Urban Settings\|last=Delgado\|first=Melvin\|language=en\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|isbn=9780195112481\|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112481.001.0001\|year=1999}}</ref> From this approach, program designers assess the needs and resources existing within a community, and, involving community stakeholders in the process, attempt to create a sustainable and equitable solution to address the community's needs.		'''Community-based program design''' is a social method for designing programs that enables social service providers, organizers, designers and evaluators to serve specific communities in their own environment. This program design method depends on the participatory approach of community development often associated with [[community practice\|community-based social work]], and is often employed by [[Community organizing\|community organizations]].<ref name="Delgado">{{Cite book\|url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112481.001.0001/acprof-9780195112481\|title=Social Work Practice in Nontraditional Urban Settings\|last=Delgado\|first=Melvin\|language=en\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|isbn=9780195112481\|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112481.001.0001\|year=1999}}</ref> From this approach, program designers assess the needs and resources existing within a community, and, involving community stakeholders in the process, attempt to create a sustainable and equitable solution to address the community's needs.

	Similar to traditional program design, community-based program design often utilizes a range of tools and models which are meant to enhance the efficacy and outcomes of the ~~program’s~~ design. The difference between traditional design and community-based design, when using these tools, is in the dynamics of the relationship between the designers, the participants, and the community as a whole. It evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]].		Similar to traditional program design, community-based program design often utilizes a range of tools and models which are meant to enhance the efficacy and outcomes of the program's design. The difference between traditional design and community-based design, when using these tools, is in the dynamics of the relationship between the designers, the participants, and the community as a whole. It evolved from the [[Charity Organization Society]] (COS) and the [[Settlement movement\|settlement house movements]].

	One advantage is a learning experience between a consumer and a social services provider. One disadvantage is a limited availability of resources. The models that can be used for it are the [[Social ecological model\|social-ecological model]], which provides a framework for program design, the [[logic model]], which is a graphical depiction of logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program, the [[social action model]], whose objectives are to recognize the change around a community in order to preserve or improve standards, understand the social action process/model is a conceptualization of how directed change takes place, and understand how the social action model can be implemented as a successful community problem solving tool, and [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)\|program evaluation]], which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of community-based programs.		One advantage is a learning experience between a consumer and a social services provider. One disadvantage is a limited availability of resources. The models that can be used for it are the [[Social ecological model\|social-ecological model]], which provides a framework for program design, the [[logic model]], which is a graphical depiction of logical relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes of a program, the [[social action model]], whose objectives are to recognize the change around a community in order to preserve or improve standards, understand the social action process/model is a conceptualization of how directed change takes place, and understand how the social action model can be implemented as a successful community problem solving tool, and [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)\|program evaluation]], which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of community-based programs.