Normalization process model - Revision history

Cherkash at 06:49, 8 May 2024

2024-05-08T06:49:27Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:49, 8 May 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:
	{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}		{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}

	The '''normalization process model''' is a sociological model, developed by [[Carl R. May]], that describes the adoption of new technologies in health care. The model provides framework for process evaluation using three components{{snd}}actors, objects, and contexts{{snd}}that are compared across four constructs: Interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration. This model helped build the [[~~Normalization~~ process theory]].		The '''normalization process model''' is a sociological model, developed by [[Carl R. May]], that describes the adoption of new technologies in health care. The model provides framework for process evaluation using three components{{snd}}actors, objects, and contexts{{snd}}that are compared across four constructs: Interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration. This model helped build the [[normalization process theory]].

	== Development ==		== Development ==

Cherkash at 06:49, 8 May 2024

2024-05-08T06:49:12Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:49, 8 May 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:
	{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}		{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}

	The '''~~Normalization~~ process model''' is a sociological model, developed by [[Carl R. May]], that describes the adoption of new technologies in health care. The model provides framework for process evaluation using three components{{snd}}actors, objects, and contexts{{snd}}that are compared across four constructs: Interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration. This model helped build the [[Normalization process theory]].		The '''normalization process model''' is a sociological model, developed by [[Carl R. May]], that describes the adoption of new technologies in health care. The model provides framework for process evaluation using three components{{snd}}actors, objects, and contexts{{snd}}that are compared across four constructs: Interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration. This model helped build the [[Normalization process theory]].

	== Development ==		== Development ==

Cherkash: /* Development */

2024-05-08T06:48:54Z

Development

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:48, 8 May 2024
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Development ==		== Development ==
	The normalization process model is a [[theory]] that explains how new technologies are embedded in health care work.<ref>May, C. 2006. "A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care." BMC Health Services Research 6: 1-11.[http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/86].</ref> The model was developed by [[Carl R May]] and co-workers,<ref>Finch, T. L., F. S. Mair, and C. R. May. 2007. "Teledermatology in the UK: lessons in service innovation." British Journal of Dermatology 156: 521-527; May, C., M. Mort, T. Williams, F.S. Mair, and L. Gask. 2003a. "Health Technology Assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare." Social Science and Medicine 57: 697-710; May, C.R., R. Harrison, T. Finch, A. MacFarlane, F.S. Mair, and P. Wallace. 2003b. "Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10: 596-604.</ref> and is an empirically derived [[grounded theory]] in [[medical sociology]] and [[science and technology studies]] (STS), based on [[qualitative methods]]. Carl May developed the model after he appeared as a witness at a [[British House of Commons]] Health Committee Inquiry on New Medical Technologies in the NHS in 2005.<ref>House of Commons Health Committee. (2005) Inquiry on New Medical Technologies in the NHS. [http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmhealth/398/39802.htm]</ref> He asked how new technologies became routinely embedded, and taken-for-granted, in everyday work, in view of the increasing corporate [[organization]] and [[regulation]] of [[healthcare]].<ref>May, C. 2007. "The clinical encounter and the problem of context." Sociology 41: 29-45.</ref> The model explains embedding by looking at the work that people do to make it possible.		The normalization process model is a [[theory]] that explains how new technologies are embedded in health care work.<ref>May, C. 2006. "A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care." BMC Health Services Research 6: 1-11.[http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/86].</ref> The model was developed by [[Carl R. May]] and co-workers,<ref>Finch, T. L., F. S. Mair, and C. R. May. 2007. "Teledermatology in the UK: lessons in service innovation." British Journal of Dermatology 156: 521-527; May, C., M. Mort, T. Williams, F.S. Mair, and L. Gask. 2003a. "Health Technology Assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare." Social Science and Medicine 57: 697-710; May, C.R., R. Harrison, T. Finch, A. MacFarlane, F.S. Mair, and P. Wallace. 2003b. "Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10: 596-604.</ref> and is an empirically derived [[grounded theory]] in [[medical sociology]] and [[science and technology studies]] (STS), based on [[qualitative methods]]. Carl May developed the model after he appeared as a witness at a [[British House of Commons]] Health Committee Inquiry on New Medical Technologies in the NHS in 2005.<ref>House of Commons Health Committee. (2005) Inquiry on New Medical Technologies in the NHS. [http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmhealth/398/39802.htm]</ref> He asked how new technologies became routinely embedded, and taken-for-granted, in everyday work, in view of the increasing corporate [[organization]] and [[regulation]] of [[healthcare]].<ref>May, C. 2007. "The clinical encounter and the problem of context." Sociology 41: 29-45.</ref> The model explains embedding by looking at the work that people do to make it possible.

	The model is a theory in sociology that fits well with macro approaches to [[innovation]] like the [[diffusion of innovations]] theory developed by [[Everett Rogers]]. Although the normalization process model is limited in scope to [[healthcare]] settings<ref>May C, T Finch, FS Mair, L Ballini, C Dowrick, et al. 2007a. "Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model." BMC Health Services Research [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/148]</ref> recent work by May and colleagues has led to the development of [[normalization process theory]], which presents a general sociological theory of implementation and integration of technological and organizational innovations.<ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. In Press.</ref><ref>May, C., Innovation and Implementation in Health Technology: Normalizing Telemedicine. In: J. Gabe, M. Calnan, Eds.), The New Sociology of the Health Service. Routledge, London, 2009.</ref><ref>May, C., Mundane Medicine, Therapeutic Relationships, and the Clinical Encounter.’ In (eds.) In: B. Pescosolido, et al., Eds.), Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing: A Blueprint for the 21st Century. Springer, New York, 2009.</ref> Normalization process theory has now superseded the more limited normalization process model.		The model is a theory in sociology that fits well with macro approaches to [[innovation]] like the [[diffusion of innovations]] theory developed by [[Everett Rogers]]. Although the normalization process model is limited in scope to [[healthcare]] settings<ref>May C, T Finch, FS Mair, L Ballini, C Dowrick, et al. 2007a. "Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model." BMC Health Services Research [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/148]</ref> recent work by May and colleagues has led to the development of [[normalization process theory]], which presents a general sociological theory of implementation and integration of technological and organizational innovations.<ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. In Press.</ref><ref>May, C., Innovation and Implementation in Health Technology: Normalizing Telemedicine. In: J. Gabe, M. Calnan, Eds.), The New Sociology of the Health Service. Routledge, London, 2009.</ref><ref>May, C., Mundane Medicine, Therapeutic Relationships, and the Clinical Encounter.’ In (eds.) In: B. Pescosolido, et al., Eds.), Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing: A Blueprint for the 21st Century. Springer, New York, 2009.</ref> Normalization process theory has now superseded the more limited normalization process model.

The Banner at 15:24, 27 September 2023

2023-09-27T15:24:20Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:24, 27 September 2023
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The normalization process model explains the embedding of complex interventions by reference to four constructs of collective action that are demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration) in a rigorous and sound theory.<ref>May C, T Finch, FS Mair, L Ballini, C Dowrick, et al. 2007a. "Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model." BMC Health Services Research [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/148]</ref>		The normalization process model explains the embedding of complex interventions by reference to four constructs of collective action that are demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration) in a rigorous and sound theory.<ref>May C, T Finch, FS Mair, L Ballini, C Dowrick, et al. 2007a. "Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model." BMC Health Services Research [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/148]</ref>

	# '''Interactional workability:''' This describes how a complex intervention is operationalized by the people using it. A complex intervention will affect co-operative [[Social interaction\|interactions]]~~{{dn\|date=January 2023}}~~ over work (its congruence), and the normal pattern of outcomes of this work (its disposal). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it confers an interactional advantage in flexibly accomplishing congruence and disposal of work.		# '''Interactional workability:''' This describes how a complex intervention is operationalized by the people using it. A complex intervention will affect co-operative [[Social interaction\|interactions]] over work (its congruence), and the normal pattern of outcomes of this work (its disposal). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it confers an interactional advantage in flexibly accomplishing congruence and disposal of work.
	# '''Relational integration:''' This describes how knowledge and work is mediated and understood within the [[social networks]] of people around it. A complex intervention will affect not only the knowledge required by its users (its accountability), but also the ways that they understand the actions of people around them (its confidence). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it equals or improves accountability and confidence within networks.		# '''Relational integration:''' This describes how knowledge and work is mediated and understood within the [[social networks]] of people around it. A complex intervention will affect not only the knowledge required by its users (its accountability), but also the ways that they understand the actions of people around them (its confidence). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it equals or improves accountability and confidence within networks.
	# '''Skill-set workability:''' This describes the distribution and conduct of work in a [[division of labor]]. A complex intervention will affect the ways that work is defined and distributed (its allocation), and the ways in which it is undertaken and evaluated (its performance). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it is calibrated to an agreed skill-set at a recognizable location in the division of labor.		# '''Skill-set workability:''' This describes the distribution and conduct of work in a [[division of labor]]. A complex intervention will affect the ways that work is defined and distributed (its allocation), and the ways in which it is undertaken and evaluated (its performance). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it is calibrated to an agreed skill-set at a recognizable location in the division of labor.

ChgoJohn: corrected spelling typo

2023-09-17T05:31:57Z

corrected spelling typo

← Previous revision		Revision as of 05:31, 17 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Short description\|~~Sosiological~~ model}}		{{Short description\|Sociological model}}
	{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}		{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}
	{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}		{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}

InternetArchiveBot: Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.3) (Jake01756 - 12294

2023-02-20T01:12:24Z

Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.3) (Jake01756 - 12294

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:12, 20 February 2023
Line 34:		Line 34:

	==External links==		==External links==
	*[http://www.normalizationprocess.org Normalization Process Theory Website]		*[http://www.normalizationprocess.org Normalization Process Theory Website] {{Webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210426031340/http://www.normalizationprocess.org/ \|date=April 26, 2021 }}

	{{DEFAULTSORT:Normalization Process Model}}		{{DEFAULTSORT:Normalization Process Model}}

Young Lecturer: Repairing links to disambiguation pages - You can help!

2023-02-03T03:43:09Z

Repairing links to disambiguation pages - You can help!

← Previous revision		Revision as of 03:43, 3 February 2023
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The normalization process model explains the embedding of complex interventions by reference to four constructs of collective action that are demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration) in a rigorous and sound theory.<ref>May C, T Finch, FS Mair, L Ballini, C Dowrick, et al. 2007a. "Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model." BMC Health Services Research [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/148]</ref>		The normalization process model explains the embedding of complex interventions by reference to four constructs of collective action that are demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration) in a rigorous and sound theory.<ref>May C, T Finch, FS Mair, L Ballini, C Dowrick, et al. 2007a. "Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model." BMC Health Services Research [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/148]</ref>

	# '''Interactional workability:''' This describes how a complex intervention is operationalized by the people using it. A complex intervention will affect co-operative [[interactions]]{{dn\|date=January 2023}} over work (its congruence), and the normal pattern of outcomes of this work (its disposal). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it confers an interactional advantage in flexibly accomplishing congruence and disposal of work.		# '''Interactional workability:''' This describes how a complex intervention is operationalized by the people using it. A complex intervention will affect co-operative [[Social interaction\|interactions]]{{dn\|date=January 2023}} over work (its congruence), and the normal pattern of outcomes of this work (its disposal). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it confers an interactional advantage in flexibly accomplishing congruence and disposal of work.
	# '''Relational integration:''' This describes how knowledge and work is mediated and understood within the [[social networks]] of people around it. A complex intervention will affect not only the knowledge required by its users (its accountability), but also the ways that they understand the actions of people around them (its confidence). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it equals or improves accountability and confidence within networks.		# '''Relational integration:''' This describes how knowledge and work is mediated and understood within the [[social networks]] of people around it. A complex intervention will affect not only the knowledge required by its users (its accountability), but also the ways that they understand the actions of people around them (its confidence). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it equals or improves accountability and confidence within networks.
	# '''Skill-set workability:''' This describes the distribution and conduct of work in a [[division of labor]]. A complex intervention will affect the ways that work is defined and distributed (its allocation), and the ways in which it is undertaken and evaluated (its performance). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it is calibrated to an agreed skill-set at a recognizable location in the division of labor.		# '''Skill-set workability:''' This describes the distribution and conduct of work in a [[division of labor]]. A complex intervention will affect the ways that work is defined and distributed (its allocation), and the ways in which it is undertaken and evaluated (its performance). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it is calibrated to an agreed skill-set at a recognizable location in the division of labor.

Rodw: Disambiguating links to Interaction (help needed) using DisamAssist.

2023-01-04T13:48:57Z

Disambiguating links to Interaction (help needed) using DisamAssist.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 13:48, 4 January 2023
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The normalization process model explains the embedding of complex interventions by reference to four constructs of collective action that are demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration) in a rigorous and sound theory.<ref>May C, T Finch, FS Mair, L Ballini, C Dowrick, et al. 2007a. "Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model." BMC Health Services Research [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/148]</ref>		The normalization process model explains the embedding of complex interventions by reference to four constructs of collective action that are demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration) in a rigorous and sound theory.<ref>May C, T Finch, FS Mair, L Ballini, C Dowrick, et al. 2007a. "Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model." BMC Health Services Research [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/148]</ref>

	# '''Interactional workability:''' This describes how a complex intervention is operationalized by the people using it. A complex intervention will affect co-operative [[interactions]] over work (its congruence), and the normal pattern of outcomes of this work (its disposal). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it confers an interactional advantage in flexibly accomplishing congruence and disposal of work.		# '''Interactional workability:''' This describes how a complex intervention is operationalized by the people using it. A complex intervention will affect co-operative [[interactions]]{{dn\|date=January 2023}} over work (its congruence), and the normal pattern of outcomes of this work (its disposal). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it confers an interactional advantage in flexibly accomplishing congruence and disposal of work.
	# '''Relational integration:''' This describes how knowledge and work is mediated and understood within the [[social networks]] of people around it. A complex intervention will affect not only the knowledge required by its users (its accountability), but also the ways that they understand the actions of people around them (its confidence). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it equals or improves accountability and confidence within networks.		# '''Relational integration:''' This describes how knowledge and work is mediated and understood within the [[social networks]] of people around it. A complex intervention will affect not only the knowledge required by its users (its accountability), but also the ways that they understand the actions of people around them (its confidence). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it equals or improves accountability and confidence within networks.
	# '''Skill-set workability:''' This describes the distribution and conduct of work in a [[division of labor]]. A complex intervention will affect the ways that work is defined and distributed (its allocation), and the ways in which it is undertaken and evaluated (its performance). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it is calibrated to an agreed skill-set at a recognizable location in the division of labor.		# '''Skill-set workability:''' This describes the distribution and conduct of work in a [[division of labor]]. A complex intervention will affect the ways that work is defined and distributed (its allocation), and the ways in which it is undertaken and evaluated (its performance). Therefore: a complex intervention is disposed to normalization if it is calibrated to an agreed skill-set at a recognizable location in the division of labor.

Qwerfjkl (bot): Capitalising short description "sosiological model" per WP:SDFORMAT (via Bandersnatch)

2022-02-12T12:00:14Z

Capitalising short description "sosiological model" per WP:SDFORMAT (via Bandersnatch)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:00, 12 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~short~~ description\|~~sosiological~~ model}}		{{Short description\|Sosiological model}}
	{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}		{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}
	{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}		{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}

Ivan Humphrey: short description

2021-03-15T13:58:00Z

short description

← Previous revision		Revision as of 13:58, 15 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{short description\|sosiological model}}
			{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}
			{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}
	{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}		{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}

← Previous revision		Revision as of 05:31, 17 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Short description\|~~Sosiological~~ model}}		{{Short description\|Sociological model}}
	{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}		{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}
	{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}		{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:00, 12 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~short~~ description\|~~sosiological~~ model}}		{{Short description\|Sosiological model}}
	{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}		{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}
	{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}		{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}

← Previous revision		Revision as of 13:58, 15 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{short description\|sosiological model}}
			{{Use American English\|date=March 2021}}
			{{Use mdy dates\|date=March 2021}}
	{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}		{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}