Normalization process theory - Revision history

Cherkash at 06:50, 8 May 2024

2024-05-08T06:50:36Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:50, 8 May 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}		{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}

	'''Normalization process theory''' ('''NPT''') is a [[sociological theory]], generally used in the fields of [[science and technology studies]] (STS), [[~~Implementation~~ ~~Science~~]], and [[healthcare system]] research. The theory deals with the adoption of technological and organizational innovations into systems, recent studies have utilized this theory in evaluating new practices in [[social care]] and [[education]] settings.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=May\|first1=Carl R.\|last2=Finch\|first2=Tracy L.\|last3=Cornford\|first3=James\|last4=Exley\|first4=Catherine\|last5=Gately\|first5=Claire\|last6=Kirk\|first6=Sue\|last7=Jenkings\|first7=K. Neil\|last8=Osbourne\|first8=Janice\|last9=Robinson\|first9=A. Louise\|last10=Rogers\|first10=Anne\|last11=Wilson\|first11=Robert\|date=2011-05-27\|title=Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?\|url= \|journal=BMC Health Services Research\|volume=11\|issue=1\|pages=131\|doi=10.1186/1472-6963-11-131\|issn=1472-6963\|pmc=3116473\|pmid=21619596 \|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=McGeechan\|first1=G J\|last2=Giles\|first2=E L\|last3=Scott\|first3=S\|last4=McGovern\|first4=R\|last5=Boniface\|first5=S\|last6=Ramsay\|first6=A\|last7=Sumnall\|first7=H\|last8=Newbury-Birch\|first8=D\|last9=Kaner\|first9=E\|last10=the SIPS JR-HIGH Study Team\|date=2019-12-20\|title=A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial\|journal=Journal of Public Health\|volume=41\|issue=4\|pages=821–829\|doi=10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|pmid=30371806\|pmc=6923514 \|issn=1741-3842\|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was developed out of the [[normalization process model]].		'''Normalization process theory''' ('''NPT''') is a [[sociological theory]], generally used in the fields of [[science and technology studies]] (STS), [[implementation research]], and [[healthcare system]] research. The theory deals with the adoption of technological and organizational innovations into systems, recent studies have utilized this theory in evaluating new practices in [[social care]] and [[education]] settings.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=May\|first1=Carl R.\|last2=Finch\|first2=Tracy L.\|last3=Cornford\|first3=James\|last4=Exley\|first4=Catherine\|last5=Gately\|first5=Claire\|last6=Kirk\|first6=Sue\|last7=Jenkings\|first7=K. Neil\|last8=Osbourne\|first8=Janice\|last9=Robinson\|first9=A. Louise\|last10=Rogers\|first10=Anne\|last11=Wilson\|first11=Robert\|date=2011-05-27\|title=Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?\|url= \|journal=BMC Health Services Research\|volume=11\|issue=1\|pages=131\|doi=10.1186/1472-6963-11-131\|issn=1472-6963\|pmc=3116473\|pmid=21619596 \|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=McGeechan\|first1=G J\|last2=Giles\|first2=E L\|last3=Scott\|first3=S\|last4=McGovern\|first4=R\|last5=Boniface\|first5=S\|last6=Ramsay\|first6=A\|last7=Sumnall\|first7=H\|last8=Newbury-Birch\|first8=D\|last9=Kaner\|first9=E\|last10=the SIPS JR-HIGH Study Team\|date=2019-12-20\|title=A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial\|journal=Journal of Public Health\|volume=41\|issue=4\|pages=821–829\|doi=10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|pmid=30371806\|pmc=6923514 \|issn=1741-3842\|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was developed out of the [[normalization process model]].

	==Origins==		==Origins==

Dough34: fix capitalization, remove space

2024-04-02T02:25:21Z

fix capitalization, remove space

← Previous revision		Revision as of 02:25, 2 April 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Origins==		==Origins==
	Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref> It was developed through [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Professor Elizabeth Murray of University College London, and chararacterised ~~Normalization~~ ~~Process~~ ~~Theory~~ as a ''trial killer''.		Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref> It was developed through [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Professor Elizabeth Murray of University College London, and chararacterised normalization process theory as a ''trial killer''.

	Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>		Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>

	==Content==		==Content==
	Normalization process theory focuses attention on agentic contributions – the things that individuals and groups ''do'' to operationalize new or modified modes of practice as they interact with dynamic elements of their environments. It defines the implementation, embedding, and integration as a process that occurs when participants deliberately initiate and seek to sustain a sequence of events that bring it into operation. The dynamics of implementation processes are complex, but normalization process theory facilitates understanding by focusing attention on the mechanisms through which participants invest and contribute to them. It reveals "the work that actors do as they engage with some ensemble of activities (that may include new or changed ways of thinking, acting, and organizing) and by which means it becomes routinely embedded in the matrices of already existing, socially patterned, knowledge and practices".<ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref> These have explored objects, agents, and contexts. In a paper published under a [[creative commons license]], May and colleagues describe how, since 2006, NPT has undergone three iterations.<ref>May, C., Sibley, A. and Hunt, K. (2014) 'The nursing work of hospital-based clinical practice guideline implementation: An explanatory systematic review using Normalisation Process Theory', International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(2), 289-299</ref>		Normalization process theory focuses attention on agentic contributions – the things that individuals and groups ''do'' to operationalize new or modified modes of practice as they interact with dynamic elements of their environments. It defines the implementation, embedding, and integration as a process that occurs when participants deliberately initiate and seek to sustain a sequence of events that bring it into operation. The dynamics of implementation processes are complex, but normalization process theory facilitates understanding by focusing attention on the mechanisms through which participants invest and contribute to them. It reveals "the work that actors do as they engage with some ensemble of activities (that may include new or changed ways of thinking, acting, and organizing) and by which means it becomes routinely embedded in the matrices of already existing, socially patterned, knowledge and practices".<ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref> These have explored objects, agents, and contexts. In a paper published under a [[creative commons license]], May and colleagues describe how, since 2006, NPT has undergone three iterations.<ref>May, C., Sibley, A. and Hunt, K. (2014) 'The nursing work of hospital-based clinical practice guideline implementation: An explanatory systematic review using Normalisation Process Theory', International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(2), 289-299</ref>

	===Objects===		===Objects===

Citation bot: Add: doi-access. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine

2023-12-03T14:23:22Z

Add: doi-access. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:23, 3 December 2023
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}		{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}

	'''Normalization process theory''' ('''NPT''') is a [[sociological theory]], generally used in the fields of [[science and technology studies]] (STS), [[Implementation Science]], and [[healthcare system]] research. The theory deals with the adoption of technological and organizational innovations into systems, recent studies have utilized this theory in evaluating new practices in [[social care]] and [[education]] settings.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=May\|first1=Carl R.\|last2=Finch\|first2=Tracy L.\|last3=Cornford\|first3=James\|last4=Exley\|first4=Catherine\|last5=Gately\|first5=Claire\|last6=Kirk\|first6=Sue\|last7=Jenkings\|first7=K. Neil\|last8=Osbourne\|first8=Janice\|last9=Robinson\|first9=A. Louise\|last10=Rogers\|first10=Anne\|last11=Wilson\|first11=Robert\|date=2011-05-27\|title=Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?\|url= \|journal=BMC Health Services Research\|volume=11\|issue=1\|pages=131\|doi=10.1186/1472-6963-11-131\|issn=1472-6963\|pmc=3116473\|pmid=21619596}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=McGeechan\|first1=G J\|last2=Giles\|first2=E L\|last3=Scott\|first3=S\|last4=McGovern\|first4=R\|last5=Boniface\|first5=S\|last6=Ramsay\|first6=A\|last7=Sumnall\|first7=H\|last8=Newbury-Birch\|first8=D\|last9=Kaner\|first9=E\|last10=the SIPS JR-HIGH Study Team\|date=2019-12-20\|title=A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial\|journal=Journal of Public Health\|volume=41\|issue=4\|pages=821–829\|doi=10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|pmid=30371806\|pmc=6923514 \|issn=1741-3842\|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was developed out of the [[normalization process model]].		'''Normalization process theory''' ('''NPT''') is a [[sociological theory]], generally used in the fields of [[science and technology studies]] (STS), [[Implementation Science]], and [[healthcare system]] research. The theory deals with the adoption of technological and organizational innovations into systems, recent studies have utilized this theory in evaluating new practices in [[social care]] and [[education]] settings.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=May\|first1=Carl R.\|last2=Finch\|first2=Tracy L.\|last3=Cornford\|first3=James\|last4=Exley\|first4=Catherine\|last5=Gately\|first5=Claire\|last6=Kirk\|first6=Sue\|last7=Jenkings\|first7=K. Neil\|last8=Osbourne\|first8=Janice\|last9=Robinson\|first9=A. Louise\|last10=Rogers\|first10=Anne\|last11=Wilson\|first11=Robert\|date=2011-05-27\|title=Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?\|url= \|journal=BMC Health Services Research\|volume=11\|issue=1\|pages=131\|doi=10.1186/1472-6963-11-131\|issn=1472-6963\|pmc=3116473\|pmid=21619596 \|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=McGeechan\|first1=G J\|last2=Giles\|first2=E L\|last3=Scott\|first3=S\|last4=McGovern\|first4=R\|last5=Boniface\|first5=S\|last6=Ramsay\|first6=A\|last7=Sumnall\|first7=H\|last8=Newbury-Birch\|first8=D\|last9=Kaner\|first9=E\|last10=the SIPS JR-HIGH Study Team\|date=2019-12-20\|title=A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial\|journal=Journal of Public Health\|volume=41\|issue=4\|pages=821–829\|doi=10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|pmid=30371806\|pmc=6923514 \|issn=1741-3842\|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was developed out of the [[normalization process model]].

	==Origins==		==Origins==

Citation bot: Add: pmc. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Anas1712 | #UCB_webform 2805/3813

2023-02-09T11:43:36Z

Add: pmc. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Anas1712 | #UCB_webform 2805/3813

← Previous revision		Revision as of 11:43, 9 February 2023
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}		{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}

	'''Normalization process theory''' ('''NPT''') is a [[sociological theory]], generally used in the fields of [[science and technology studies]] (STS), [[Implementation Science]], and [[healthcare system]] research. The theory deals with the adoption of technological and organizational innovations into systems, recent studies have utilized this theory in evaluating new practices in [[social care]] and [[education]] settings.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=May\|first1=Carl R.\|last2=Finch\|first2=Tracy L.\|last3=Cornford\|first3=James\|last4=Exley\|first4=Catherine\|last5=Gately\|first5=Claire\|last6=Kirk\|first6=Sue\|last7=Jenkings\|first7=K. Neil\|last8=Osbourne\|first8=Janice\|last9=Robinson\|first9=A. Louise\|last10=Rogers\|first10=Anne\|last11=Wilson\|first11=Robert\|date=2011-05-27\|title=Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?\|url= \|journal=BMC Health Services Research\|volume=11\|issue=1\|pages=131\|doi=10.1186/1472-6963-11-131\|issn=1472-6963\|pmc=3116473\|pmid=21619596}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=McGeechan\|first1=G J\|last2=Giles\|first2=E L\|last3=Scott\|first3=S\|last4=McGovern\|first4=R\|last5=Boniface\|first5=S\|last6=Ramsay\|first6=A\|last7=Sumnall\|first7=H\|last8=Newbury-Birch\|first8=D\|last9=Kaner\|first9=E\|last10=the SIPS JR-HIGH Study Team\|date=2019-12-20\|title=A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial~~\|url=https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy184~~\|journal=Journal of Public Health\|volume=41\|issue=4\|pages=821–829\|doi=10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|pmid=30371806\|issn=1741-3842\|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was developed out of the [[normalization process model]].		'''Normalization process theory''' ('''NPT''') is a [[sociological theory]], generally used in the fields of [[science and technology studies]] (STS), [[Implementation Science]], and [[healthcare system]] research. The theory deals with the adoption of technological and organizational innovations into systems, recent studies have utilized this theory in evaluating new practices in [[social care]] and [[education]] settings.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=May\|first1=Carl R.\|last2=Finch\|first2=Tracy L.\|last3=Cornford\|first3=James\|last4=Exley\|first4=Catherine\|last5=Gately\|first5=Claire\|last6=Kirk\|first6=Sue\|last7=Jenkings\|first7=K. Neil\|last8=Osbourne\|first8=Janice\|last9=Robinson\|first9=A. Louise\|last10=Rogers\|first10=Anne\|last11=Wilson\|first11=Robert\|date=2011-05-27\|title=Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?\|url= \|journal=BMC Health Services Research\|volume=11\|issue=1\|pages=131\|doi=10.1186/1472-6963-11-131\|issn=1472-6963\|pmc=3116473\|pmid=21619596}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=McGeechan\|first1=G J\|last2=Giles\|first2=E L\|last3=Scott\|first3=S\|last4=McGovern\|first4=R\|last5=Boniface\|first5=S\|last6=Ramsay\|first6=A\|last7=Sumnall\|first7=H\|last8=Newbury-Birch\|first8=D\|last9=Kaner\|first9=E\|last10=the SIPS JR-HIGH Study Team\|date=2019-12-20\|title=A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial\|journal=Journal of Public Health\|volume=41\|issue=4\|pages=821–829\|doi=10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|pmid=30371806\|pmc=6923514 \|issn=1741-3842\|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was developed out of the [[normalization process model]].

	==Origins==		==Origins==

WikiCleanerBot: v2.04b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation)

2022-06-20T00:38:32Z

v2.04b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 00:38, 20 June 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Origins==		==Origins==
	Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009 <ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref>. It was developed through [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Professor Elizabeth Murray of University College London, and chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.		Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref> It was developed through [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Professor Elizabeth Murray of University College London, and chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.

	Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>		Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>

Bearcat: no redlinked categories on articles; only categories that actually exist are permitted

2022-06-17T18:25:53Z

no redlinked categories on articles; only categories that actually exist are permitted

← Previous revision		Revision as of 18:25, 17 June 2022
Line 33:		Line 33:
	[[Category:Technological change]]		[[Category:Technological change]]
	[[Category:Science and technology studies]]		[[Category:Science and technology studies]]
	[[Category: implementation science]]

Sheila van Damm: /* Origins */ tidied up, edited out list of names

2022-06-13T16:16:17Z

Origins: tidied up, edited out list of names

← Previous revision		Revision as of 16:16, 13 June 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Origins==		==Origins==
	Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009 <ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref>. ~~Its development~~ was ~~funded~~ by [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Elizabeth Murray in ~~collaboration~~ ~~with~~ ~~May~~, ~~Tracy Finch, Anne Kennedy, [[Victor Montori]], Catherine Pope, Pauline Ong, Ann Rogers~~ and ~~others. They~~ chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.		Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009 <ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref>. It was developed through [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Professor Elizabeth Murray of University College London, and chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.

	Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>		Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>

Sheila van Damm at 12:27, 11 June 2022

2022-06-11T12:27:20Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:27, 11 June 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Origins==		==Origins==
	Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009 <ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref>. Its development was funded by [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to ~~[[ESRC]]~~ May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Elizabeth Murray in collaboration with May, Tracy Finch, Anne Kennedy, [[Victor Montori]], Catherine Pope, Pauline Ong, Ann Rogers and others. They chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.		Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009 <ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref>. Its development was funded by [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Elizabeth Murray in collaboration with May, Tracy Finch, Anne Kennedy, [[Victor Montori]], Catherine Pope, Pauline Ong, Ann Rogers and others. They chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.

	Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>		Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>

Sheila van Damm: minor corrections and spelling corrections. Reference to Victor M Montori added

2022-06-11T12:25:49Z

minor corrections and spelling corrections. Reference to Victor M Montori added

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:25, 11 June 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}		{{primary sources\|date=March 2016}}

	'''Normalization process theory''' ('''NPT''') is a [[sociological theory]], generally used in the fields of [[science and technology studies]] (STS) and [[healthcare system]] research. The theory deals with the adoption of technological and organizational innovations into systems, recent studies have utilized this theory in evaluating new practices in [[social care]] and [[education]] settings.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=May\|first1=Carl R.\|last2=Finch\|first2=Tracy L.\|last3=Cornford\|first3=James\|last4=Exley\|first4=Catherine\|last5=Gately\|first5=Claire\|last6=Kirk\|first6=Sue\|last7=Jenkings\|first7=K. Neil\|last8=Osbourne\|first8=Janice\|last9=Robinson\|first9=A. Louise\|last10=Rogers\|first10=Anne\|last11=Wilson\|first11=Robert\|date=2011-05-27\|title=Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?\|url= \|journal=BMC Health Services Research\|volume=11\|issue=1\|pages=131\|doi=10.1186/1472-6963-11-131\|issn=1472-6963\|pmc=3116473\|pmid=21619596}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=McGeechan\|first1=G J\|last2=Giles\|first2=E L\|last3=Scott\|first3=S\|last4=McGovern\|first4=R\|last5=Boniface\|first5=S\|last6=Ramsay\|first6=A\|last7=Sumnall\|first7=H\|last8=Newbury-Birch\|first8=D\|last9=Kaner\|first9=E\|last10=the SIPS JR-HIGH Study Team\|date=2019-12-20\|title=A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial\|url=https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|journal=Journal of Public Health\|volume=41\|issue=4\|pages=821–829\|doi=10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|pmid=30371806\|issn=1741-3842\|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was developed out of the [[normalization process model]].		'''Normalization process theory''' ('''NPT''') is a [[sociological theory]], generally used in the fields of [[science and technology studies]] (STS), [[Implementation Science]], and [[healthcare system]] research. The theory deals with the adoption of technological and organizational innovations into systems, recent studies have utilized this theory in evaluating new practices in [[social care]] and [[education]] settings.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=May\|first1=Carl R.\|last2=Finch\|first2=Tracy L.\|last3=Cornford\|first3=James\|last4=Exley\|first4=Catherine\|last5=Gately\|first5=Claire\|last6=Kirk\|first6=Sue\|last7=Jenkings\|first7=K. Neil\|last8=Osbourne\|first8=Janice\|last9=Robinson\|first9=A. Louise\|last10=Rogers\|first10=Anne\|last11=Wilson\|first11=Robert\|date=2011-05-27\|title=Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?\|url= \|journal=BMC Health Services Research\|volume=11\|issue=1\|pages=131\|doi=10.1186/1472-6963-11-131\|issn=1472-6963\|pmc=3116473\|pmid=21619596}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=McGeechan\|first1=G J\|last2=Giles\|first2=E L\|last3=Scott\|first3=S\|last4=McGovern\|first4=R\|last5=Boniface\|first5=S\|last6=Ramsay\|first6=A\|last7=Sumnall\|first7=H\|last8=Newbury-Birch\|first8=D\|last9=Kaner\|first9=E\|last10=the SIPS JR-HIGH Study Team\|date=2019-12-20\|title=A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial\|url=https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|journal=Journal of Public Health\|volume=41\|issue=4\|pages=821–829\|doi=10.1093/pubmed/fdy184\|pmid=30371806\|issn=1741-3842\|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was developed out of the [[normalization process model]].

	==Origins==		==Origins==
	Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and ~~sustainability~~ of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl. R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009 <ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref> <ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref>. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Elizabeth Murray in collaboration with ~~[[Carl R.~~ May]], Tracy Finch, ~~Catherine Pope,~~ Anne Kennedy, Pauline Ong and others. They chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.		Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainment of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009 <ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref><ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref>. Its development was funded by [[ESRC]] funded research on [[Telehealth]] and through an [[ESRC]] fellowship to [[ESRC]] May. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Elizabeth Murray in collaboration with May, Tracy Finch, Anne Kennedy, [[Victor Montori]], Catherine Pope, Pauline Ong, Ann Rogers and others. They chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.

	Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>		Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>

Sheila van Damm: Minor corrections to description of development of the theory

2022-06-11T12:17:56Z

Minor corrections to description of development of the theory

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:17, 11 June 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Origins==		==Origins==
	Normalization process theory, dealing with the implementation, embedding, and ~~integration~~ of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed ~~originally from a collective set of learning workshops and included a large number of people including~~ [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, ~~Elizabeth~~ ~~Murray,~~ ~~Anne~~ ~~Rogers,~~ ~~Catherine~~ ~~Pope~~, ~~Anne Kennedy~~, ~~Pauline~~ ~~Ong~~ and ~~others~~. ~~The~~ ~~theory~~ ~~emerged~~ ~~from~~ a ~~programme~~ of ~~theory~~ ~~building~~ by ~~May~~ and a ~~range~~ of ~~academics~~ ~~from~~ ~~applied~~ ~~social~~ ~~science~~ ~~to medicine~~.<ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref> ~~Through~~ ~~three~~ ~~iterations, the theory has built upon the~~ [[~~normalization~~ ~~process~~ ~~model~~]] ~~previously~~ ~~developed~~ by ~~May~~ ~~et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions~~ in ~~health~~ ~~care.~~ ~~BMC~~ ~~Health Services Research~~. ~~6</ref><ref>~~May, C., et ~~al.~~, ~~2007.~~ ~~Understanding~~ ~~the~~ ~~implementation~~ of ~~complex~~ ~~interventions~~ in ~~health~~ ~~care:~~ ~~the~~ ~~normalization~~ ~~process~~ ~~model.~~ ~~BMC Health Services Research~~. ~~7.</ref>~~		Normalization process theory, dealing with the adoption, implementation, embedding, integration, and sustainability of new technologies and organizational innovations, was developed by [[Carl. R. May]], Tracy Finch, and colleagues between 2003 and 2009 <ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref> <ref>May CR, Mair F, Finch T, Macfarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29.</ref>. Its application to [[randomised controlled trials]] was led by Elizabeth Murray in collaboration with [[Carl R. May]], Tracy Finch, Catherine Pope, Anne Kennedy, Pauline Ong and others. They chararacterised Normalization Process Theory as a ''trial killer''.

			Through three iterations, the theory has built upon the [[normalization process model]] previously developed by May et al. to explain the social processes that lead to the routine embedding of innovative health technologies.<ref>May, C., 2006. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research. 6</ref><ref>May, C., et al., 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research. 7.</ref>

	==Content==		==Content==
	Normalization process theory focuses attention on agentic contributions – the things that individuals and groups do to operationalize new or modified modes of practice as they interact with dynamic elements of their environments. It defines the implementation, embedding, and integration as a process that occurs when participants deliberately initiate and seek to sustain a sequence of events that bring it into operation. The dynamics of implementation processes are complex, but normalization process theory facilitates understanding by focusing attention on the mechanisms through which participants invest and contribute to them. It reveals "the work that actors do as they engage with some ensemble of activities (that may include new or changed ways of thinking, acting, and organizing) and by which means it becomes routinely embedded in the matrices of already existing, socially patterned, knowledge and practices".<ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref> These have explored objects, agents, and contexts. In a paper published under a [[creative commons license]], May and colleagues describe how, since 2006, NPT has undergone three iterations.<ref>May, C., Sibley, A. and Hunt, K. (2014) 'The nursing work of hospital-based clinical practice guideline implementation: An explanatory systematic review using Normalisation Process Theory', International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(2), 289-299</ref>		Normalization process theory focuses attention on agentic contributions – the things that individuals and groups ''do'' to operationalize new or modified modes of practice as they interact with dynamic elements of their environments. It defines the implementation, embedding, and integration as a process that occurs when participants deliberately initiate and seek to sustain a sequence of events that bring it into operation. The dynamics of implementation processes are complex, but normalization process theory facilitates understanding by focusing attention on the mechanisms through which participants invest and contribute to them. It reveals "the work that actors do as they engage with some ensemble of activities (that may include new or changed ways of thinking, acting, and organizing) and by which means it becomes routinely embedded in the matrices of already existing, socially patterned, knowledge and practices".<ref>May, C., Finch, T., 2009. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 43(3), 535-554.</ref> These have explored objects, agents, and contexts. In a paper published under a [[creative commons license]], May and colleagues describe how, since 2006, NPT has undergone three iterations.<ref>May, C., Sibley, A. and Hunt, K. (2014) 'The nursing work of hospital-based clinical practice guideline implementation: An explanatory systematic review using Normalisation Process Theory', International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(2), 289-299</ref>

	===Objects===		===Objects===
Line 31:		Line 33:
	[[Category:Technological change]]		[[Category:Technological change]]
	[[Category:Science and technology studies]]		[[Category:Science and technology studies]]
			[[Category: implementation science]]