Talk:Course-of-values recursion - Revision history

Cewbot: Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field.

2024-03-09T00:05:46Z

Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 00:05, 9 March 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\|		{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\|
	{{WikiProject Mathematics\|priority=Low~~\|field=foundations~~}}		{{WikiProject Mathematics\|priority=Low}}
	}}		}}
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==

2024-01-29T06:10:16Z

Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:10, 29 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~maths~~ ~~rating~~\|class=Start\|~~priority=Low\|field=foundations}}~~		{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\|
			{{WikiProject Mathematics\|priority=Low\|field=foundations}}
			}}
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==
	<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)		<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

2018-05-15T09:19:34Z

Signing comment by 88.191.80.254 - "Misleading sentence: new section"

← Previous revision		Revision as of 09:19, 15 May 2018
Line 10:		Line 10:
	"the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence '''by a primitive recursive function'''".		"the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence '''by a primitive recursive function'''".

	At first I was very puzzled, then I kept reading the full article and indeed it is explained below that h must be primitive-recursive.		At first I was very puzzled, then I kept reading the full article and indeed it is explained below that h must be primitive-recursive. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.191.80.254\|88.191.80.254]] ([[User talk:88.191.80.254#top\|talk]]) 09:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

2018-05-15T09:18:29Z

Misleading sentence: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 09:18, 15 May 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)		<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
	:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert\|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)		:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert\|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

			== Misleading sentence ==

			As far as I cans tell "the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence" sentence at the beginning of the article is misleading. It should be:

			"the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence '''by a primitive recursive function'''".

			At first I was very puzzled, then I kept reading the full article and indeed it is explained below that h must be primitive-recursive.

2016-06-18T09:54:50Z

Ackermann's function?: I added about that in the article

← Previous revision		Revision as of 09:54, 18 June 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)		<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
	:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert\|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)		:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert\|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

	== Ackermann's function? ==

	Is it worth adding an explanation why this can't be done with [[Ackermann's function]]?[[User:Dan Gluck\|Dan Gluck]] ([[User talk:Dan Gluck\|talk]]) 21:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

2016-06-17T21:30:12Z

Ackermann's function?: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 21:30, 17 June 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)		<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
	:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert\|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)		:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert\|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

			== Ackermann's function? ==

			Is it worth adding an explanation why this can't be done with [[Ackermann's function]]?[[User:Dan Gluck\|Dan Gluck]] ([[User talk:Dan Gluck\|talk]]) 21:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

2010-02-22T12:52:56Z

Rating article for WikiProject Mathematics. Quality: Start / Priority: Low / Field: foundations (script assisted)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:52, 22 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{maths rating\|class=Start\|priority=Low\|field=foundations}}
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==
	<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)		<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

2007-02-23T00:00:05Z

moved Talk:Course-of-value recursion to Talk:Course-of-values recursion: The adjective in this phrase is ordinarily plural; thre is no course if there is only one value

← Previous revision	Revision as of 00:00, 23 February 2007
(No difference)

2007-02-22T23:58:43Z

Merge?: retract

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:58, 22 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Merge? ==		== Merge? ==
	Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]? [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)		<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
			:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert\|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

2006-10-26T16:39:27Z

New page

== Merge? ==
Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]? [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)