Talk:OPTICS algorithm - Revision history

Qwerfjkl (bot): Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)

2024-01-23T22:06:43Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 22:06, 23 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject ~~Statistics~~ \|class=C \|~~importance=low}}~~		{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\|
			{{WikiProject Statistics \|importance=low}}
			}}

	== Pseudocode ==		== Pseudocode ==

GreenC bot: Add {{reflist-talk}} to #Is the algorithm correct? (via reftalk bot)

2019-02-07T15:11:43Z

Add {{reflist-talk}} to #Is the algorithm correct? (via reftalk bot)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:11, 7 February 2019
Line 16:		Line 16:

	: The function <tt>core-distance(q, eps, Minpts)</tt> can return UNDEFINED. It is not given in pseudo-code. [[User:Chire\|Chire]] ([[User talk:Chire\|talk]]) 12:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)		: The function <tt>core-distance(q, eps, Minpts)</tt> can return UNDEFINED. It is not given in pseudo-code. [[User:Chire\|Chire]] ([[User talk:Chire\|talk]]) 12:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

			{{reflist-talk}}

SineBot: Signing comment by 158.193.100.8 - ""

2018-11-07T18:51:04Z

Signing comment by 158.193.100.8 - ""

← Previous revision		Revision as of 18:51, 7 November 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== Pseudocode ==		== Pseudocode ==
	The pseudocode in the article contains sentence "output p to the ordered list". Does the ordered list means a cluster?		The pseudocode in the article contains sentence "output p to the ordered list". Does the ordered list means a cluster? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/158.193.100.8\|158.193.100.8]] ([[User talk:158.193.100.8#top\|talk]]) 18:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	== Reference to broken DOI ==		== Reference to broken DOI ==

158.193.100.8 at 18:49, 7 November 2018

2018-11-07T18:49:59Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 18:49, 7 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Statistics \|class=C \|importance=low}}		{{WikiProject Statistics \|class=C \|importance=low}}

			== Pseudocode ==
			The pseudocode in the article contains sentence "output p to the ordered list". Does the ordered list means a cluster?

	== Reference to broken DOI ==		== Reference to broken DOI ==

Mark viking: Assessment: Statistics: class=C (assisted)

2016-02-19T01:33:55Z

Assessment: Statistics: class=C (assisted)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:33, 19 February 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Statistics\|class=~~start~~\|importance=low}}		{{WikiProject Statistics \|class=C \|importance=low}}

	== Reference to broken DOI ==		== Reference to broken DOI ==

Chire: /* Is the algorithm correct? */

2016-02-08T12:35:35Z

Is the algorithm correct?

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:35, 8 February 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	== Is the algorithm correct? ==		== Is the algorithm correct? ==
	At no point in the algorithm is the property core-distance actually set to a non-undefined value. <ref>http://fogo.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/OPTICS.pdf</ref> suggests that this should happen when the seed-points are marked as processed. (i.e. after "mark q as processed") <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Completely unique username\|Completely unique username]] ([[User talk:Completely unique username\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Completely unique username\|contribs]]) 16:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		At no point in the algorithm is the property core-distance actually set to a non-undefined value. <ref>http://fogo.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/OPTICS.pdf</ref> suggests that this should happen when the seed-points are marked as processed. (i.e. after "mark q as processed") <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Completely unique username\|Completely unique username]] ([[User talk:Completely unique username\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Completely unique username\|contribs]]) 16:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			: The function <tt>core-distance(q, eps, Minpts)</tt> can return UNDEFINED. It is not given in pseudo-code. [[User:Chire\|Chire]] ([[User talk:Chire\|talk]]) 12:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Completely unique username at 16:21, 5 February 2016

2016-02-05T16:21:54Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 16:21, 5 February 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:
	[[Special:Contributions/37.110.18.166\|37.110.18.166]] ([[User talk:37.110.18.166\|talk]]) 17:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/37.110.18.166\|37.110.18.166]] ([[User talk:37.110.18.166\|talk]]) 17:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

	== Is the algorithm correct?		== Is the algorithm correct? ==
	At no point in the algorithm is the property core-distance actually set to a non-undefined value. <ref>http://fogo.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/OPTICS.pdf</ref> suggests that this should happen when the seed-points are marked as processed. (i.e. after "mark q as processed") <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Completely unique username\|Completely unique username]] ([[User talk:Completely unique username\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Completely unique username\|contribs]]) 16:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		At no point in the algorithm is the property core-distance actually set to a non-undefined value. <ref>http://fogo.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/OPTICS.pdf</ref> suggests that this should happen when the seed-points are marked as processed. (i.e. after "mark q as processed") <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Completely unique username\|Completely unique username]] ([[User talk:Completely unique username\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Completely unique username\|contribs]]) 16:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

SineBot: Signing comment by Completely unique username - ""

2016-02-05T16:21:30Z

Signing comment by Completely unique username - ""

← Previous revision		Revision as of 16:21, 5 February 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== Is the algorithm correct?		== Is the algorithm correct?
	At no point in the algorithm is the property core-distance actually set to a non-undefined value. <ref>http://fogo.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/OPTICS.pdf</ref> suggests that this should happen when the seed-points are marked as processed. (i.e. after "mark q as processed")		At no point in the algorithm is the property core-distance actually set to a non-undefined value. <ref>http://fogo.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/OPTICS.pdf</ref> suggests that this should happen when the seed-points are marked as processed. (i.e. after "mark q as processed") <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Completely unique username\|Completely unique username]] ([[User talk:Completely unique username\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Completely unique username\|contribs]]) 16:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Completely unique username at 16:20, 5 February 2016

2016-02-05T16:20:34Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 16:20, 5 February 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Is there anybody who could understand the essence of the algorithm with help of the explanation given in this article?==		== Is there anybody who could understand the essence of the algorithm with help of the explanation given in this article?==
	[[Special:Contributions/37.110.18.166\|37.110.18.166]] ([[User talk:37.110.18.166\|talk]]) 17:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/37.110.18.166\|37.110.18.166]] ([[User talk:37.110.18.166\|talk]]) 17:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

			== Is the algorithm correct?
			At no point in the algorithm is the property core-distance actually set to a non-undefined value. <ref>http://fogo.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/OPTICS.pdf</ref> suggests that this should happen when the seed-points are marked as processed. (i.e. after "mark q as processed")

37.110.18.166: /* Is there anybody who could understand the essence of algorithm with help of explanation given in this article? */

2014-03-10T17:48:43Z

Is there anybody who could understand the essence of algorithm with help of explanation given in this article?

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:48, 10 March 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: Done: DOI given by Springer was for the whole book, not just the chapter. Manual "cite book" now. --[[User:Chire2\|Chire2]] ([[User talk:Chire2\|talk]]) 11:47, 4 May 2010 (UTC)		: Done: DOI given by Springer was for the whole book, not just the chapter. Manual "cite book" now. --[[User:Chire2\|Chire2]] ([[User talk:Chire2\|talk]]) 11:47, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

	== Is there anybody who could understand the essence of algorithm with help of explanation given in this article?==		== Is there anybody who could understand the essence of the algorithm with help of the explanation given in this article?==
	[[Special:Contributions/37.110.18.166\|37.110.18.166]] ([[User talk:37.110.18.166\|talk]]) 17:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/37.110.18.166\|37.110.18.166]] ([[User talk:37.110.18.166\|talk]]) 17:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)