Talk:Unicode collation algorithm - Revision history

Novem Linguae: Reverted edit by 2603:8001:4400:DC3:304D:9A1C:C01:EACC (talk) to last version by Cewbot

2024-11-29T21:31:21Z

Reverted edit by 2603:8001:4400:DC3:304D:9A1C:C01:EACC (talk) to last version by Cewbot

← Previous revision		Revision as of 21:31, 29 November 2024
Line 28:		Line 28:
	As of 2015, few programming languages offer built-in UCA-compatible alphabetic sorting, and the programmer needs to call on third-party software.		As of 2015, few programming languages offer built-in UCA-compatible alphabetic sorting, and the programmer needs to call on third-party software.

			1. International Components for Unicode (ICU): the collation module.
	1.
			Free: yes
			Usable from: C, C++, Java
			Written in: C, C++
			Source available: yes
			Link: http://site.icu-project.org/

			2. ICU4PAS, a wrapper for the 2006 version of ICU.
			Free: yes
			Written in: Object Pascal
			Usable from: Delphi Pascal, Free Pascal
			Source available: yes
			Link: http://www.crossgl.com/icu4pas/index.html

			3. Ouedraogo's UCA implementation.
			Free: yes
			Written in: Object Pascal
			Usable from: Free Pascal
			Source available: yes
			Link: https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/blob/master/rtl/objpas/unicodedata.pas
			https://forums.embarcadero.com/message.jspa?messageID=694421#694421

			There may be others. See, for a start, the language wrappers for ICU listed at http://site.icu-project.org/related

			This could be merged with the existing "Tools" section of the article, but note that the Tools section presently consists of (1) an online demo with a secondary reference to ICU; (2) a unix stand-alone utility; (3) an apparently inaccessible library. Programming libraries, stand-alone utilities, and online demos are tools for different purposes, and it would be best not to mix them.
			<small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.144.80.128\|95.144.80.128]] ([[User talk:95.144.80.128\|talk]]) 17:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	== External link appears to be broken ==		== External link appears to be broken ==

2603:8001:4400:DC3:304D:9A1C:C01:EACC: /* Using UCA from programming languages */

2024-11-29T15:02:01Z

Using UCA from programming languages

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:02, 29 November 2024
Line 28:		Line 28:
	As of 2015, few programming languages offer built-in UCA-compatible alphabetic sorting, and the programmer needs to call on third-party software.		As of 2015, few programming languages offer built-in UCA-compatible alphabetic sorting, and the programmer needs to call on third-party software.

			1.
	1. International Components for Unicode (ICU): the collation module.
	Free: yes
	Usable from: C, C++, Java
	Written in: C, C++
	Source available: yes
	Link: http://site.icu-project.org/

	2. ICU4PAS, a wrapper for the 2006 version of ICU.
	Free: yes
	Written in: Object Pascal
	Usable from: Delphi Pascal, Free Pascal
	Source available: yes
	Link: http://www.crossgl.com/icu4pas/index.html

	3. Ouedraogo's UCA implementation.
	Free: yes
	Written in: Object Pascal
	Usable from: Free Pascal
	Source available: yes
	Link: https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/blob/master/rtl/objpas/unicodedata.pas
	https://forums.embarcadero.com/message.jspa?messageID=694421#694421

	There may be others. See, for a start, the language wrappers for ICU listed at http://site.icu-project.org/related

	This could be merged with the existing "Tools" section of the article, but note that the Tools section presently consists of (1) an online demo with a secondary reference to ICU; (2) a unix stand-alone utility; (3) an apparently inaccessible library. Programming libraries, stand-alone utilities, and online demos are tools for different purposes, and it would be best not to mix them.
	<small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.144.80.128\|95.144.80.128]] ([[User talk:95.144.80.128\|talk]]) 17:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	== External link appears to be broken ==		== External link appears to be broken ==

Cewbot: Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}.

2024-02-10T14:24:52Z

Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:24, 10 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject ~~Computing~~ \|class=Stub \|importance=Low \|software=y \|software-importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Stub\|
			{{WikiProject Computing \|importance=Low \|software=y \|software-importance=Low}}
			}}
	Whats "tailoring" in this context? Theres no explanation here and I cant find other articles to wikilink. [[User:Shinhan\|Shinhan]] 20:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)		Whats "tailoring" in this context? Theres no explanation here and I cant find other articles to wikilink. [[User:Shinhan\|Shinhan]] 20:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

MalnadachBot: Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)

2022-02-25T07:35:31Z

Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 07:35, 25 February 2022
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* '''Oppose''', lets keep the lowercase one. As I read it, the title is ''also'' a correct description of the thing. Therefor we do not need to use the proper name. e.g. think of naming it "Collation (Unicode)" for this same page (is not a proposal, but to illustrate my point). But maybe I do not see enough. -[[User:DePiep\|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep\|talk]]) 19:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)		* '''Oppose''', lets keep the lowercase one. As I read it, the title is ''also'' a correct description of the thing. Therefor we do not need to use the proper name. e.g. think of naming it "Collation (Unicode)" for this same page (is not a proposal, but to illustrate my point). But maybe I do not see enough. -[[User:DePiep\|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep\|talk]]) 19:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
	* '''Oppose.''' I don't get the sense that UCA is a [[WP:MOSPN\|proper name]] in the same sense as George Washington is a proper name. We don't capitalize binary search, quicksort, or shellsort. There's only one George, but there may be many implementations (and even copies of those implementations) of the algorithm. It doesn't refer to a particular individual. [[User:Glrx\|Glrx]] ([[User talk:Glrx\|talk]]) 23:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)		* '''Oppose.''' I don't get the sense that UCA is a [[WP:MOSPN\|proper name]] in the same sense as George Washington is a proper name. We don't capitalize binary search, quicksort, or shellsort. There's only one George, but there may be many implementations (and even copies of those implementations) of the algorithm. It doesn't refer to a particular individual. [[User:Glrx\|Glrx]] ([[User talk:Glrx\|talk]]) 23:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM\|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM\|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

	== Using UCA from programming languages ==		== Using UCA from programming languages ==

46.208.254.129: /* External link appears to be broken */ new section

2020-06-12T13:54:08Z

External link appears to be broken: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 13:54, 12 June 2020
Line 52:		Line 52:
	This could be merged with the existing "Tools" section of the article, but note that the Tools section presently consists of (1) an online demo with a secondary reference to ICU; (2) a unix stand-alone utility; (3) an apparently inaccessible library. Programming libraries, stand-alone utilities, and online demos are tools for different purposes, and it would be best not to mix them.		This could be merged with the existing "Tools" section of the article, but note that the Tools section presently consists of (1) an online demo with a secondary reference to ICU; (2) a unix stand-alone utility; (3) an apparently inaccessible library. Programming libraries, stand-alone utilities, and online demos are tools for different purposes, and it would be best not to mix them.
	<small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.144.80.128\|95.144.80.128]] ([[User talk:95.144.80.128\|talk]]) 17:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		<small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.144.80.128\|95.144.80.128]] ([[User talk:95.144.80.128\|talk]]) 17:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			== External link appears to be broken ==

			The external link to "Unicode Technical Standard #10" appears to be broken. I have found what appears to be equivalent material at
			https://unicode.org/reports/tr10/
			but I don't feel that I am competent to change the link on the Wikipedia Article page.

Widefox: Assessment: Computing: importance=Low, -auto, software=y, software-importance=Low (assisted)

2016-09-29T13:44:45Z

Assessment: Computing: importance=Low, -auto, software=y, software-importance=Low (assisted)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 13:44, 29 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Computing\|class=Stub\|importance=\|~~auto~~=~~yes~~}}		{{WikiProject Computing \|class=Stub \|importance=Low \|software=y \|software-importance=Low}}
	Whats "tailoring" in this context? Theres no explanation here and I cant find other articles to wikilink. [[User:Shinhan\|Shinhan]] 20:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)		Whats "tailoring" in this context? Theres no explanation here and I cant find other articles to wikilink. [[User:Shinhan\|Shinhan]] 20:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


	==Requested move==		==Requested move==

95.144.80.128: Added a link

2015-04-24T22:52:51Z

Added a link

← Previous revision		Revision as of 22:52, 24 April 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	As of 2015, few programming languages offer built-in UCA-compatible alphabetic sorting, and the programmer needs to call on third-party software.		As of 2015, few programming languages offer built-in UCA-compatible alphabetic sorting, and the programmer needs to call on third-party software.

	1. International Components for Unicode (ICU).		1. International Components for Unicode (ICU): the collation module.
	Free: yes		Free: yes
	Usable from: C, C++, Java		Usable from: C, C++, Java
Line 46:		Line 46:
	Usable from: Free Pascal		Usable from: Free Pascal
	Source available: yes		Source available: yes
	Link: https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/blob/master/rtl/objpas/unicodedata.pas ; https://forums.embarcadero.com/message.jspa?messageID=694421#694421		Link: https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/blob/master/rtl/objpas/unicodedata.pas
			https://forums.embarcadero.com/message.jspa?messageID=694421#694421

			There may be others. See, for a start, the language wrappers for ICU listed at http://site.icu-project.org/related
	There may be others.

	This could be merged with the existing "Tools" section of the article, but note that the Tools section presently consists of (1) an online demo with a secondary reference to ICU; (2) a unix stand-alone utility; (3) an apparently inaccessible library. Programming libraries, stand-alone utilities, and online demos are tools for different purposes, and it would be best not to mix them.		This could be merged with the existing "Tools" section of the article, but note that the Tools section presently consists of (1) an online demo with a secondary reference to ICU; (2) a unix stand-alone utility; (3) an apparently inaccessible library. Programming libraries, stand-alone utilities, and online demos are tools for different purposes, and it would be best not to mix them.

95.144.80.128: Last sentence reworded.

2015-03-27T21:30:26Z

Last sentence reworded.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 21:30, 27 March 2015
Line 50:		Line 50:
	There may be others.		There may be others.

	~~Note~~ ~~that~~ the existing "Tools" section of the article ~~does~~ ~~not~~ ~~contain~~ ~~anything~~ ~~usable~~ ~~for~~ ~~programming,~~ ~~but~~ ~~rather~~ (1) an online demo (2) a unix stand-alone utility (3) an apparently inaccessible library. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.144.80.128\|95.144.80.128]] ([[User talk:95.144.80.128\|talk]]) 17:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		This could be merged with the existing "Tools" section of the article, but note that the Tools section presently consists of (1) an online demo with a secondary reference to ICU; (2) a unix stand-alone utility; (3) an apparently inaccessible library. Programming libraries, stand-alone utilities, and online demos are tools for different purposes, and it would be best not to mix them.
			<small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.144.80.128\|95.144.80.128]] ([[User talk:95.144.80.128\|talk]]) 17:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

SineBot: Signing comment by 95.144.80.128 - "/* Using UCA from programming languages */ new section"

2015-03-26T17:24:34Z

Signing comment by 95.144.80.128 - "Using UCA from programming languages: new section"

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:24, 26 March 2015
Line 50:		Line 50:
	There may be others.		There may be others.

	Note that the existing "Tools" section of the article does not contain anything usable for programming, but rather (1) an online demo (2) a unix stand-alone utility (3) an apparently inaccessible library.		Note that the existing "Tools" section of the article does not contain anything usable for programming, but rather (1) an online demo (2) a unix stand-alone utility (3) an apparently inaccessible library. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.144.80.128\|95.144.80.128]] ([[User talk:95.144.80.128\|talk]]) 17:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

95.144.80.128: /* Using UCA from programming languages */ new section

2015-03-26T17:23:30Z

Using UCA from programming languages: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:23, 26 March 2015
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* '''Oppose.''' I don't get the sense that UCA is a [[WP:MOSPN\|proper name]] in the same sense as George Washington is a proper name. We don't capitalize binary search, quicksort, or shellsort. There's only one George, but there may be many implementations (and even copies of those implementations) of the algorithm. It doesn't refer to a particular individual. [[User:Glrx\|Glrx]] ([[User talk:Glrx\|talk]]) 23:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)		* '''Oppose.''' I don't get the sense that UCA is a [[WP:MOSPN\|proper name]] in the same sense as George Washington is a proper name. We don't capitalize binary search, quicksort, or shellsort. There's only one George, but there may be many implementations (and even copies of those implementations) of the algorithm. It doesn't refer to a particular individual. [[User:Glrx\|Glrx]] ([[User talk:Glrx\|talk]]) 23:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM\|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM\|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

			== Using UCA from programming languages ==

			As of 2015, few programming languages offer built-in UCA-compatible alphabetic sorting, and the programmer needs to call on third-party software.

			1. International Components for Unicode (ICU).
			Free: yes
			Usable from: C, C++, Java
			Written in: C, C++
			Source available: yes
			Link: http://site.icu-project.org/

			2. ICU4PAS, a wrapper for the 2006 version of ICU.
			Free: yes
			Written in: Object Pascal
			Usable from: Delphi Pascal, Free Pascal
			Source available: yes
			Link: http://www.crossgl.com/icu4pas/index.html

			3. Ouedraogo's UCA implementation.
			Free: yes
			Written in: Object Pascal
			Usable from: Free Pascal
			Source available: yes
			Link: https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/blob/master/rtl/objpas/unicodedata.pas ; https://forums.embarcadero.com/message.jspa?messageID=694421#694421

			There may be others.

			Note that the existing "Tools" section of the article does not contain anything usable for programming, but rather (1) an online demo (2) a unix stand-alone utility (3) an apparently inaccessible library.