Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm - Revision history

MalnadachBot: Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)

2022-03-19T19:29:32Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 19:29, 19 March 2022
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Yet another "nature-inspired" [[metaheuristic]]. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)		Yet another "nature-inspired" [[metaheuristic]]. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
	:: See also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 20:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)		:: See also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 20:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science\|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<~~font~~ ~~size~~="-2">1000</~~font~~>]]</sup></span> 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science\|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)</small>
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<~~font~~ ~~size~~="-2">1000</~~font~~>]]</sup></span> 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)</small>
	*'''Oppose''' for each of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish [[WP:GNG]]. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet [[WP:RS]] and establish [[WP:GNG]]. Why demand a higher standard in this case? [[User:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)		*'''Oppose''' for each of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish [[WP:GNG]]. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet [[WP:RS]] and establish [[WP:GNG]]. Why demand a higher standard in this case? [[User:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<~~font~~ ~~size~~="-2">1000</~~font~~>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

MalnadachBot: Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)

2022-02-07T11:17:36Z

Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 11:17, 7 February 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:
	*'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson\|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson\|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)		*'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson\|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson\|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
	{{clear}}		{{clear}}
	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages\|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages\|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

MalnadachBot: Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)

2022-01-25T11:02:42Z

Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 11:02, 25 January 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->		Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

	The result was '''no consensus'''. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein\|<~~font~~ style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</~~font~~>]]</span></small> 08:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)		The result was '''no consensus'''. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein\|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 08:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
	===[[Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]===		===[[Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]===

Hazard-Bot: Bot: Removing closed AfD from Category:Relisted AfD debates

2016-08-10T14:25:01Z

Bot: Removing closed AfD from Category:Relisted AfD debates

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:25, 10 August 2016
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*'''Oppose''' for each of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish [[WP:GNG]]. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet [[WP:RS]] and establish [[WP:GNG]]. Why demand a higher standard in this case? [[User:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)		*'''Oppose''' for each of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish [[WP:GNG]]. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet [[WP:RS]] and establish [[WP:GNG]]. Why demand a higher standard in this case? [[User:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --~~><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude~~></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --~~><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude~~></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
	*'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson\|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson\|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)		*'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson\|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson\|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
	{{clear}}		{{clear}}

Sandstein: Closing debate, result was no consensus

2016-08-07T08:21:05Z

Closing debate, result was no consensus

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===[[Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]===
 :{{la|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 30#{{anchorencode:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuttlefish_Optimization_Algorithm Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 14: / Line 21: @@
 <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
 *'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Yellow Dingo: Reverted to revision 733236749 by Andrew Davidson (talk): Actually I leave this for an admin. (TW)

2016-08-07T07:33:54Z

Reverted to revision 733236749 by Andrew Davidson (talk): Actually I leave this for an admin. (TW)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===[[Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]===
 :{{la|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 30#{{anchorencode:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuttlefish_Optimization_Algorithm Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 21: / Line 14: @@
 <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
 *'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Yellow Dingo: more

2016-08-07T07:32:51Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 07:32, 7 August 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->		Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

	The result was '''keep'''. <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD\|(non-admin closure)]]</small> '''[[User:Yellow Dingo\|<b style="color:#FFCC33">Yellow</b> <b style="color:brown">Dingo]]''' [[User talk:Yellow Dingo\|<b style="color:BLUE">(talk)</b>]] 07:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)		The result was '''keep'''. I'm not against a merge but that should be discussed on the talk page. <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD\|(non-admin closure)]]</small> '''[[User:Yellow Dingo\|<b style="color:#FFCC33">Yellow</b> <b style="color:brown">Dingo]]''' [[User talk:Yellow Dingo\|<b style="color:BLUE">(talk)</b>]] 07:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
	===[[Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]===		===[[Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]===

Yellow Dingo: Closing debate, result was keep (non-admin closure)

2016-08-07T07:32:11Z

Closing debate, result was keep (non-admin closure)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===[[Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]===
 :{{la|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 30#{{anchorencode:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuttlefish_Optimization_Algorithm Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 14: / Line 21: @@
 <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
 *'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Andrew Davidson: /* Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm */ k/m

2016-08-06T11:21:03Z

Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm: k/m

← Previous revision		Revision as of 11:21, 6 August 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
			*'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson\|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson\|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Music1201: Relisting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm

2016-07-30T03:07:28Z

Relisting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm

← Previous revision		Revision as of 03:07, 30 July 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}		{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}

	:{{la\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 22#{{anchorencode:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}}\|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuttlefish_Optimization_Algorithm Stats]</span>)		:{{la\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 30#{{anchorencode:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}}\|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuttlefish_Optimization_Algorithm Stats]</span>)
	:({{Find sources AFD\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}})		:({{Find sources AFD\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}})
	Yet another "nature-inspired" [[metaheuristic]]. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)		Yet another "nature-inspired" [[metaheuristic]]. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
			<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
			<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

← Previous revision		Revision as of 19:29, 19 March 2022
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Yet another "nature-inspired" [[metaheuristic]]. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)		Yet another "nature-inspired" [[metaheuristic]]. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
	:: See also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 20:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)		:: See also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 20:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science\|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<~~font~~ ~~size~~="-2">1000</~~font~~>]]</sup></span> 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science\|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)</small>
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<~~font~~ ~~size~~="-2">1000</~~font~~>]]</sup></span> 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)</small>
	*'''Oppose''' for each of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish [[WP:GNG]]. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet [[WP:RS]] and establish [[WP:GNG]]. Why demand a higher standard in this case? [[User:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)		*'''Oppose''' for each of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish [[WP:GNG]]. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet [[WP:RS]] and establish [[WP:GNG]]. Why demand a higher standard in this case? [[User:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<~~font~~ ~~size~~="-2">1000</~~font~~>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:25, 10 August 2016
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*'''Oppose''' for each of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish [[WP:GNG]]. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet [[WP:RS]] and establish [[WP:GNG]]. Why demand a higher standard in this case? [[User:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)		*'''Oppose''' for each of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish [[WP:GNG]]. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet [[WP:RS]] and establish [[WP:GNG]]. Why demand a higher standard in this case? [[User:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry\|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --~~><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude~~></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --~~><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude~~></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
	*'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson\|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson\|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)		*'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson\|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson\|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
	{{clear}}		{{clear}}

← Previous revision		Revision as of 03:07, 30 July 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}		{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}

	:{{la\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 22#{{anchorencode:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}}\|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuttlefish_Optimization_Algorithm Stats]</span>)		:{{la\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 30#{{anchorencode:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}}\|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuttlefish_Optimization_Algorithm Stats]</span>)
	:({{Find sources AFD\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}})		:({{Find sources AFD\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}})
	Yet another "nature-inspired" [[metaheuristic]]. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)		Yet another "nature-inspired" [[metaheuristic]]. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />		<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
	<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->		<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000\|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000\|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
			<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize\|91%\|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
			<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201\|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201\|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->