Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java - Revision history

MalnadachBot: Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)

2022-02-03T07:16:42Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 07:16, 3 February 2022
Line 25:		Line 25:

	* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

WOSlinker: fix some lint errors

2017-09-30T17:59:17Z

fix some lint errors

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:59, 30 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 5#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)		:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 5#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)
	:({{Find sources\|XQuery API for Java}})		:({{Find sources\|XQuery API for Java}})
	I felt tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is about a piece of software. No evidence of notability. — [[::User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] {{toolbar\|separator=dot\|[[::User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] \| [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]] }} 14:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)		I felt tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is about a piece of software. No evidence of notability. — [[User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] {{toolbar\|separator=dot\|[[User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]] }} 14:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
	*'''Delete''' the article's one citation, though from a reliable source, does little more than establish that the subject does, in fact, exist. Sources that establish relevance should be necessary. I know personal knowledge isn't supposed to come into play, but as a Java developer, I'd never heard of this, a certain hint that it might not exactly be common or notable in the java world. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 16:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' the article's one citation, though from a reliable source, does little more than establish that the subject does, in fact, exist. Sources that establish relevance should be necessary. I know personal knowledge isn't supposed to come into play, but as a Java developer, I'd never heard of this, a certain hint that it might not exactly be common or notable in the java world. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 16:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
	*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Protonk: Closing debate, result was keep

2011-07-12T22:03:13Z

Closing debate, result was keep

← Previous revision		Revision as of 22:03, 12 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''keep'''. Leaning toward no consensus, but the sources provided in the discussion give weight to the keep arguments. [[User:Protonk\|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk\|talk]]) 22:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
	===[[XQuery API for Java]]===		===[[XQuery API for Java]]===
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}

	:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 5#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)		:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 5#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 12:		Line 18:
	<hr style="width:55%;" />		<hr style="width:55%;" />
	:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />		:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
	:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman\|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman\|talk]]) 00:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->~~[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]~~		:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman\|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman\|talk]]) 00:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
	<hr style="width:55%;" />		<hr style="width:55%;" />

Line 19:		Line 25:

	* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Tom Morris: ce my keep comment

2011-07-12T01:07:48Z

ce my keep comment

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:07, 12 July 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	** '''Comment''' are you suggesting that after your own thorough investigation, you were unable to find sufficient amount of references that you think would be necessary for an article, to the point that it would be worth inconveniencing users searching for XQJ, and wasting valuable time of editors like myself who have contributed to this article? Are you saying that you did this research and find the topic in and of itself unworthy of coverage on Wikipedia? I don't see you putting this amount of thought and time into it to be able to reach this conclusion. --[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 17:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)		** '''Comment''' are you suggesting that after your own thorough investigation, you were unable to find sufficient amount of references that you think would be necessary for an article, to the point that it would be worth inconveniencing users searching for XQJ, and wasting valuable time of editors like myself who have contributed to this article? Are you saying that you did this research and find the topic in and of itself unworthy of coverage on Wikipedia? I don't see you putting this amount of thought and time into it to be able to reach this conclusion. --[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 17:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

	* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few of books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Bxj: reply

2011-07-09T17:51:47Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:51, 9 July 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	* '''Delete''' per nom: no sources. may be worth redirecting, but I can't work out what would be the best target out of all the links on that page. [[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		* '''Delete''' per nom: no sources. may be worth redirecting, but I can't work out what would be the best target out of all the links on that page. [[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
			** '''Comment''' are you suggesting that after your own thorough investigation, you were unable to find sufficient amount of references that you think would be necessary for an article, to the point that it would be worth inconveniencing users searching for XQJ, and wasting valuable time of editors like myself who have contributed to this article? Are you saying that you did this research and find the topic in and of itself unworthy of coverage on Wikipedia? I don't see you putting this amount of thought and time into it to be able to reach this conclusion. --[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 17:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

	* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few of books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few of books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Tom Morris: keep

2011-07-05T11:31:06Z

keep

← Previous revision		Revision as of 11:31, 5 July 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	* '''Delete''' per nom: no sources. may be worth redirecting, but I can't work out what would be the best target out of all the links on that page. [[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		* '''Delete''' per nom: no sources. may be worth redirecting, but I can't work out what would be the best target out of all the links on that page. [[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

			* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few of books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Ohconfucius: /* XQuery API for Java */ Delete

2011-07-05T09:42:54Z

XQuery API for Java: Delete

← Previous revision		Revision as of 09:42, 5 July 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman\|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman\|talk]]) 00:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]		:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman\|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman\|talk]]) 00:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
	<hr style="width:55%;" />		<hr style="width:55%;" />

			* '''Delete''' per nom: no sources. may be worth redirecting, but I can't work out what would be the best target out of all the links on that page. [[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Ron Ritzman: Relisting debate

2011-07-05T00:05:37Z

Relisting debate

← Previous revision		Revision as of 00:05, 5 July 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}		{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}

	:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 ~~June~~ 28#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)		:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 5#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)
	:({{Find sources\|XQuery API for Java}})		:({{Find sources\|XQuery API for Java}})
	I felt tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is about a piece of software. No evidence of notability. — [[::User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] {{toolbar\|separator=dot\|[[::User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] \| [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]] }} 14:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)		I felt tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is about a piece of software. No evidence of notability. — [[::User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] {{toolbar\|separator=dot\|[[::User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] \| [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]] }} 14:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*** Currently, when a user looks up the word XQJ, they get a perfectly fine definition. If it's deleted, this will no longer be the case. By saying that we need to "rescue" it, you make it sound like it's in a dire shape right now. By saying you're a Java developer, you make it sound like you want to speak from authority, so that others who don't understand the details should just nod along to your opinions. By linking to [[WP:ITEXISTS]], you make it sound like I haven't said anything already. It's backed by Intel, Sun, Nokia, and Oracle in the Java Community Process[http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=225], and it's implemented in the Oracle database, as well as other databases listed in the article [[XML database]]. It's an API for a major language and for a W3C Recommendation known as XQuery. Not to mention, the criteria for not screwing things up by deleting a perfectly fine article is completely detached from keeping the reader's interests a priority.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)		*** Currently, when a user looks up the word XQJ, they get a perfectly fine definition. If it's deleted, this will no longer be the case. By saying that we need to "rescue" it, you make it sound like it's in a dire shape right now. By saying you're a Java developer, you make it sound like you want to speak from authority, so that others who don't understand the details should just nod along to your opinions. By linking to [[WP:ITEXISTS]], you make it sound like I haven't said anything already. It's backed by Intel, Sun, Nokia, and Oracle in the Java Community Process[http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=225], and it's implemented in the Oracle database, as well as other databases listed in the article [[XML database]]. It's an API for a major language and for a W3C Recommendation known as XQuery. Not to mention, the criteria for not screwing things up by deleting a perfectly fine article is completely detached from keeping the reader's interests a priority.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>
			<hr style="width:55%;" />
			:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
			:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman\|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman\|talk]]) 00:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
			<hr style="width:55%;" />

Bxj at 05:17, 1 July 2011

2011-07-01T05:17:12Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 05:17, 1 July 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
	**While JSRs are important, it should be a part of every wikipedia article to establish the relevance of the subject. Could you, just unsourced and informally, explain where and to whom xquery might be relevant? Given that information we might be able to stage an article rescue, without it, we've really got nothing more than [[WP:ITEXISTS]] here. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 12:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		**While JSRs are important, it should be a part of every wikipedia article to establish the relevance of the subject. Could you, just unsourced and informally, explain where and to whom xquery might be relevant? Given that information we might be able to stage an article rescue, without it, we've really got nothing more than [[WP:ITEXISTS]] here. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 12:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
			*** Currently, when a user looks up the word XQJ, they get a perfectly fine definition. If it's deleted, this will no longer be the case. By saying that we need to "rescue" it, you make it sound like it's in a dire shape right now. By saying you're a Java developer, you make it sound like you want to speak from authority, so that others who don't understand the details should just nod along to your opinions. By linking to [[WP:ITEXISTS]], you make it sound like I haven't said anything already. It's backed by Intel, Sun, Nokia, and Oracle in the Java Community Process[http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=225], and it's implemented in the Oracle database, as well as other databases listed in the article [[XML database]]. It's an API for a major language and for a W3C Recommendation known as XQuery. Not to mention, the criteria for not screwing things up by deleting a perfectly fine article is completely detached from keeping the reader's interests a priority.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>

Gene93k: Listing on WP:DELSORT under Software

2011-06-29T18:11:26Z

Listing on WP:DELSORT under Software

← Previous revision		Revision as of 18:11, 29 June 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
	**While JSRs are important, it should be a part of every wikipedia article to establish the relevance of the subject. Could you, just unsourced and informally, explain where and to whom xquery might be relevant? Given that information we might be able to stage an article rescue, without it, we've really got nothing more than [[WP:ITEXISTS]] here. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 12:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		**While JSRs are important, it should be a part of every wikipedia article to establish the relevance of the subject. Could you, just unsourced and informally, explain where and to whom xquery might be relevant? Given that information we might be able to stage an article rescue, without it, we've really got nothing more than [[WP:ITEXISTS]] here. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 12:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
			:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:59, 30 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 5#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)		:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 5#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)
	:({{Find sources\|XQuery API for Java}})		:({{Find sources\|XQuery API for Java}})
	I felt tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is about a piece of software. No evidence of notability. — [[::User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] {{toolbar\|separator=dot\|[[::User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] \| [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]] }} 14:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)		I felt tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is about a piece of software. No evidence of notability. — [[User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] {{toolbar\|separator=dot\|[[User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]] }} 14:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
	*'''Delete''' the article's one citation, though from a reliable source, does little more than establish that the subject does, in fact, exist. Sources that establish relevance should be necessary. I know personal knowledge isn't supposed to come into play, but as a Java developer, I'd never heard of this, a certain hint that it might not exactly be common or notable in the java world. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 16:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' the article's one citation, though from a reliable source, does little more than establish that the subject does, in fact, exist. Sources that establish relevance should be necessary. I know personal knowledge isn't supposed to come into play, but as a Java developer, I'd never heard of this, a certain hint that it might not exactly be common or notable in the java world. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 16:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
	*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:51, 9 July 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	* '''Delete''' per nom: no sources. may be worth redirecting, but I can't work out what would be the best target out of all the links on that page. [[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		* '''Delete''' per nom: no sources. may be worth redirecting, but I can't work out what would be the best target out of all the links on that page. [[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
			** '''Comment''' are you suggesting that after your own thorough investigation, you were unable to find sufficient amount of references that you think would be necessary for an article, to the point that it would be worth inconveniencing users searching for XQJ, and wasting valuable time of editors like myself who have contributed to this article? Are you saying that you did this research and find the topic in and of itself unworthy of coverage on Wikipedia? I don't see you putting this amount of thought and time into it to be able to reach this conclusion. --[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 17:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

	* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few of books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		* '''Keep''' There are some good sources actually: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/07/xquery-review InfoQ] (an enterprise software site), [http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1294 XML.com] (which is published by O'Reilly Publishing), [http://www.soamag.com/I10/0907-3.pdf SOAMag] (PDF) and [http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34642/1954 DevX]. It is also mentioned in a few ACM conference papers - [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1024717 here], [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1066300 here]. It is also mentioned in a few of books including ''Java and XML'' (McLaughlin and Edelson), ''XQuery'' (Walmsley), ''Querying XML'' (Melton and Buxton), ''Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g'' (Greenwald et al.).—[[User:Tom Morris\|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris\|talk]]) 11:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 00:05, 5 July 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}		{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}

	:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 ~~June~~ 28#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)		:{{la\|XQuery API for Java}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XQuery API for Java\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 5#{{anchorencode:XQuery API for Java}}\|View log]]</noinclude>)
	:({{Find sources\|XQuery API for Java}})		:({{Find sources\|XQuery API for Java}})
	I felt tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is about a piece of software. No evidence of notability. — [[::User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] {{toolbar\|separator=dot\|[[::User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] \| [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]] }} 14:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)		I felt tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is about a piece of software. No evidence of notability. — [[::User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] {{toolbar\|separator=dot\|[[::User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] \| [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]] }} 14:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*** Currently, when a user looks up the word XQJ, they get a perfectly fine definition. If it's deleted, this will no longer be the case. By saying that we need to "rescue" it, you make it sound like it's in a dire shape right now. By saying you're a Java developer, you make it sound like you want to speak from authority, so that others who don't understand the details should just nod along to your opinions. By linking to [[WP:ITEXISTS]], you make it sound like I haven't said anything already. It's backed by Intel, Sun, Nokia, and Oracle in the Java Community Process[http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=225], and it's implemented in the Oracle database, as well as other databases listed in the article [[XML database]]. It's an API for a major language and for a W3C Recommendation known as XQuery. Not to mention, the criteria for not screwing things up by deleting a perfectly fine article is completely detached from keeping the reader's interests a priority.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)		*** Currently, when a user looks up the word XQJ, they get a perfectly fine definition. If it's deleted, this will no longer be the case. By saying that we need to "rescue" it, you make it sound like it's in a dire shape right now. By saying you're a Java developer, you make it sound like you want to speak from authority, so that others who don't understand the details should just nod along to your opinions. By linking to [[WP:ITEXISTS]], you make it sound like I haven't said anything already. It's backed by Intel, Sun, Nokia, and Oracle in the Java Community Process[http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=225], and it's implemented in the Oracle database, as well as other databases listed in the article [[XML database]]. It's an API for a major language and for a W3C Recommendation known as XQuery. Not to mention, the criteria for not screwing things up by deleting a perfectly fine article is completely detached from keeping the reader's interests a priority.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>
			<hr style="width:55%;" />
			:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST\|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
			:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman\|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman\|talk]]) 00:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
			<hr style="width:55%;" />

← Previous revision		Revision as of 05:17, 1 July 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
	**While JSRs are important, it should be a part of every wikipedia article to establish the relevance of the subject. Could you, just unsourced and informally, explain where and to whom xquery might be relevant? Given that information we might be able to stage an article rescue, without it, we've really got nothing more than [[WP:ITEXISTS]] here. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 12:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		**While JSRs are important, it should be a part of every wikipedia article to establish the relevance of the subject. Could you, just unsourced and informally, explain where and to whom xquery might be relevant? Given that information we might be able to stage an article rescue, without it, we've really got nothing more than [[WP:ITEXISTS]] here. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 12:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
			*** Currently, when a user looks up the word XQJ, they get a perfectly fine definition. If it's deleted, this will no longer be the case. By saying that we need to "rescue" it, you make it sound like it's in a dire shape right now. By saying you're a Java developer, you make it sound like you want to speak from authority, so that others who don't understand the details should just nod along to your opinions. By linking to [[WP:ITEXISTS]], you make it sound like I haven't said anything already. It's backed by Intel, Sun, Nokia, and Oracle in the Java Community Process[http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=225], and it's implemented in the Oracle database, as well as other databases listed in the article [[XML database]]. It's an API for a major language and for a W3C Recommendation known as XQuery. Not to mention, the criteria for not screwing things up by deleting a perfectly fine article is completely detached from keeping the reader's interests a priority.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>

← Previous revision		Revision as of 18:11, 29 June 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		*As another Java developer, I say '''keep.''' JSRs are notable in the tech industry, and adopted by multiple notable frameworks as I've mentioned in the edit summary for removing prod. XQJ is already explained in multiple other articles: this article is an obvious and only reasonable result to appear when searching for XQJ, unless you have suggestions otherwise. Just for your reference, "no context" is for: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article." (see: [[WP:SPEEDY]]) The subject of the article, "XQuery API for Java" is as the title suggests. I can't imagine how the subject of the article could be any more blatantly obvious.--[[User:Bxj\|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj\|talk]]) 07:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
	**While JSRs are important, it should be a part of every wikipedia article to establish the relevance of the subject. Could you, just unsourced and informally, explain where and to whom xquery might be relevant? Given that information we might be able to stage an article rescue, without it, we've really got nothing more than [[WP:ITEXISTS]] here. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 12:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		**While JSRs are important, it should be a part of every wikipedia article to establish the relevance of the subject. Could you, just unsourced and informally, explain where and to whom xquery might be relevant? Given that information we might be able to stage an article rescue, without it, we've really got nothing more than [[WP:ITEXISTS]] here. [[User:Ikanreed\|i kan reed]] ([[User talk:Ikanreed\|talk]]) 12:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
			:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small>