Jump to content

Curse and mark of Cain: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Interpretations based on race: moved section to proper place
Improved section title per MOS:LDS as Latter Day Saint movement is the accepted formatting and capitalization for the broader branch of religion. Added relevant wikilink.
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Phrase originating in the Hebrew Bible}}
{{cleanup-date|August 2005}}{{POV check}}
{{Redirect|Mark of Cain}}
The '''Curse of Cain''' refers to Jewish and Christian biblical passages in Genesis where God [[Tetragrammaton|YHWH]] placed a curse upon [[Cain]], the firstborn of [[Adam]] and [[Eve]]. This curse has been interpreted in many ways. Most Biblical scholars currently interpret the "curse" as the Bible indicates, Cain's inability to cultivate crops and the necessity that he lead a nomadic lifestyle.


[[File:Caïn venant de tuer son frère Abel by Henri Vidal, Tuileries Garden, 18 July 2017.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Cain, 1896, by [[Henri Vidal (sculptor)|Henri Vidal]], [[Jardin des Tuileries]], [[Paris]]]]
In recent history, the "curse of cain" had been often been equated with the "mark" which the god [[Tetragrammaton|YHWH]] also placed upon Cain. In [[18th century]] America and Europe, a link was assumed by whites that equated this "mark" to black skin, thereby linking any black person to being a descendant of Cain. This curse/mark doctrine was used by some [[Christianity|Christians]] to justify [[racism]] and the [[slavery|enslavement]] of people of [[African]] ancestry. Others have used the curse as a Biblical justification for [[anti-Semitism]]. These racial and ethnic interpretations of the curse have been largely abandoned even by the most conservative theologians since the mid-[[20th century]], although the theory still has some following among [[white supremacy|white supremacists]] and an older generation of Americans, as well as a very small minority of Christian churches.


The '''curse of Cain''' and the '''mark of Cain''' are phrases that originated in the story of [[Cain and Abel]] in the [[Book of Genesis]]. In the stories, if someone harmed [[Cain]], the damage would come back sevenfold. Some interpretations view this as a physical mark, whereas other interpretations see the "mark" as a sign, and not as a physical mark on Cain himself. The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] reads "set a mark upon Cain".
==The curse and mark of Cain in the Bible==
The ''Bible'' refers to the curse of cain in the fourth chapter of the [[Book of Genesis]]. This passage describes two brothers, [[Cain]] and [[Abel]]. Cain, the oldest, "worked the soil", while Abel raised sheep. ([[Book of Genesis]] 4:2). Eventually, each of the brothers performs a sacrifice to YHWH; Cain's sacrifices some of his crops, while Abel sacrifices "fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock." ([[Book of Genesis|Gen.]] 4:4.) When YHWH accepted Abel's offering, but not Cain's, Cain's face becomes "downcast" ([[Book of Genesis|Gen.]] 4:5), and he attacks Abel and kills him in the field. ([[Book of Genesis|Gen.]] 4:8)


== Origins ==
When the god [[YHWH|Tetragrammaton]] confronts Cain about Abel's death, YHWH curses him, stating:
{{Main|Cain and Abel}}
There is no clear consensus as to what Cain's mark was.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Thursby|first=Jacqueline S.|date=2013|title=A Slave Tale: Closing an Anathema|journal=NAAAS Conference Proceedings. National Association of African American Studies|id={{ProQuest|1498460617}}}}</ref> The word translated as "mark" in [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis+4%3A15&version=NIV Genesis 4:15] is {{Script/Hebrew|א֔וֹת}} ('''ōṯ''), which could mean a sign, omen, warning, remembrance, motion, gesture, agreement, miracle, wonder, or, most commonly, a letter. In the [[Torah]], the same word is used to describe the stars as signs or omens ([https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis+1%3A14&version=NIV Genesis 1:14]), the rainbow as the sign of [[God]]'s promise never again to destroy his creation with a [[Genesis flood narrative|flood]] ([https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis+9%3A12&version=NIV Genesis 9:12]), [[circumcision]] as a token of God's covenant with [[Abraham]] ([https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis+17%3A11&version=NIV Genesis 17:11]), and the miracles performed by [[Moses]] before the [[Pharaoh]] ([https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+4%3A8&version=NIV Exodus 4:8],[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+4%3A9&version=NIV 9],[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+4%3A17&version=NIV 17],[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+4%3A28&version=NIV 28]; [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+7%3A3&version=NIV 7:3]; [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+8%3A23&version=NIV 8:23]; [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+10%3A1&version=NIV 10:1],[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+10%3A2&version=NIV 2]).


== Curse of Cain ==
:"Your brother's blood cries out to me from the ground. Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother's blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth." ([[Book of Genesis|Gen.]] 4:10-12.)
[[File:Glasgow Botanic Gardens. Kibble Palace. Edwin Roscoe Mullins - 'Cain' (c. 1899).jpg|thumb|[[Glasgow Botanic Gardens]]. Kibble Palace. [[Edwin Roscoe Mullins]] – ''Cain'' or ''My Punishment is Greater than I can Bear'' ([https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis+4%3A13&version=NIV Genesis 4:13]), about 1899.]]
[[File:Wilhelm Gross-12.jpg|thumb|Print by [[Wilhelm Groß]] of Cain with mark of a [[Chi Rho]] (1956/57).]]
The narrative of the curse of Cain is found in the text of {{Bibleverse|Genesis|4:11–16|HE}}. The curse was the result of Cain murdering his brother, Abel, and lying about the murder to God.{{sfn|Byron|2011|p=93}} When Cain spilled his brother's blood, the earth became cursed as soon as the blood hit the ground. In a sense, the earth was left "drinking Abel's blood".<ref name=":0">{{harvnb|Byron|2011|p=95}}: {{Bibleverse|Genesis|4:11|HE}}</ref> {{Bibleverse|Genesis|4:12|HE}} gives a two-part [[Sentence (law)|sentencing]] for Cain's curse. The first concerns the earth that was cursed by Abel's blood.<ref>{{harvnb|Byron|2011|p=97}}: Kugel, 163</ref> Should Cain attempt to farm the land, the earth would not yield produce for him. This may imply why he went on to build cities,<ref>{{harvnb|Byron|2011|p=97}}: Wenham, 108</ref> namely the City of Enoch. The second part of the curse marks Cain as a fugitive ({{Langx|he|נע|nā‘}}) and a wanderer ({{Langx|he|נד|nāḏ}}). The combination making up this Hebrew phrase {{Script/Hebrew|נע ונד}}, "fugitive and wanderer," is [[Hapax legomenon#Hebrew examples|unique in the Hebrew Bible]]. Modern interpretations of the Hebrew verse 12 suggest that Cain went on to live a nomadic lifestyle and that he was also excluded from the family unit.{{sfn|Byron|2011|p=97}} In the [[Septuagint]], the emphasis on Cain's curse is dramatically increased by the combination of the Greek participles στένων καὶ τρέμων (''stenōn kai tremōn'', "groaning and shaking upon the earth").<ref>{{harvnb|Byron|2011|p=98}}: Brayford, 254</ref> [[Syriac Christianity]]{{sfn|Byron|2011|p=100}} interprets the Greek version to mean that Cain experienced a real physical affliction<ref>{{harvnb|Byron|2011|p=98}}: ''See footnote 14''</ref> that would enable others to know who he was when they saw him. [[Philo]] interprets the Greek verse 12 as an allegory for Cain's fear of being [[wikt:soulless|soul-less]]. The [[Samaritan Pentateuch]] and the [[Targum]]s translate the same verse to mean that Cain feared being "an exile and an unstable man".{{sfn|Byron|2011|pp=98–100}}


==Mark of Cain==
When Cain complained that the curse was too strong, and that anyone who finds him would kill him, YHWH responded, "Not so; if anyone kills Cain, he will suffer vengeance seven times over", and YHWH "put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him." ([[Book of Genesis|Gen.]] 4:15).
The ''mark of Cain'' is God's promise to offer Cain divine protection from premature death with the stated purpose of preventing anyone from killing him. It is not known what the mark was, but it is assumed that the mark was visible.<ref>{{harvnb|Byron|2011|p=119}}: Mellinkoff, 1942, p. 210; Moberley, 2007, pp. 11–28</ref> Some have speculated that the mark was a Hebrew or Sumerian letter placed on either the face or the arm.<ref>{{harvnb|Byron|2011|p=120}}: (''Tg. Ps.-J.'' Gen 4:15, ''Pirqe R. El.'' 21)</ref> The [[Septuagint]] translates the ''mark'' as a "sign". Thus, it is speculated that the mark served as a ''sign'' to others not to commit the same offense.<ref name="GenRab22">{{harvnb|Byron|2011|p=120}}: ''Gen. Rab.'' 22:12</ref>{{sfn|Byron|2011|p=106}}


=== Judaism===
==Interpretations of the curse of Cain==
[[Abba Arika]] ("Rav") said that God gave Cain a dog, making him an example for murderers. [[Abba Jose ben Hanan]] said that God made a horn grow out of Cain. [[Haninah|R. Hanin]] said that God made Cain an example to [[penitent]]s (''[[Genesis Rabbah|Gen. Rab.]]'' 22:12).<ref name="GenRab22"/>
===Modern scholarly interpretations===
There is no scholarly consensus as to the original meaning and significance of the curse and mark of Cain. Because the name Cain (or ''qayin'' in Hebrew, meaning ''spear''), is identical with the name [[Kenite]] (also ''qayin'' in Hebrew), some scholars speculate that the curse of Cain may have arisen as a condemnation of the Kenites. In the Bible, however, the Kenites are generally described favorably, and may have had an important influence on the early Hebrew religion.


[[Rashi]] (1:4) comments on {{bibleverse|Genesis|4:15|KJV}} by saying that the mark was one of the Hebrew letters of the [[Tetragrammaton]]:
There is also no clear consensus as to what Cain's "mark" would be. The word translated as "mark" in Gen. 4:15 is '' 'owth'', which could mean a sign, an omen, a warning, or a remembrance. In the [[Torah]], the same word is used to describe the stars as signs or omens (Gen. 1:14), the rainbow as the sign of the flood (Gen. 9:12), [[circumcision]] as a token of YHWH's covenant with [[Abraham]] (Gen. 17:11), and the miracles performed by [[Moses]] before [[Pharaoh]]. Thus, the text of the ''Bible'' only explicitly describes how the "mark" was to function as a sign or warning, not what form the mark took.
"He engraved a letter of His [God's] Name onto his [Cain's] forehead."<ref name="Rashi_Parshat_Bereshit_4_15">{{cite web|url=http://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/8168/showrashi/true#v15 |title=Genesis – Chapter 4 (Parshah Bereishit) – Tanakh Online – Torah – Bible |publisher=Chabad.org |access-date=2012-09-21}}</ref> The same statement about the Tetragrammaton was expressed by [[Targum Jonathan]], Pirqé [[Eliezer ben Hurcanus|Rabbi Eliezer]] 21, and [[Zohar]] I.36b.<ref>Annarita Magri, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335936_Caino_lo_gnosticismo_e_i_testimonia_nel_quadro_dell'esegesi_del_II_sec_I_Perati_e_i_Cainiti {{lang|it|Caino, lo gnosticismo e i testimonia nel quadro dell’esegesi del II sec. I Perati e i Cainiti}}], January 2007</ref>


In [[Kabbalah]], the [[Zohar]] states that the mark of Cain was one of the twenty-two [[Hebrew alphabet|Hebrew letters]] of the [[Torah]], although the Zohar's native [[Aramaic language|Aramaic]] does not actually tell us which of the letters it was. Some commentators, such as [[Michael Berg (Kabbalah Centre)|Rabbi Michael Berg]] in his English commentary on the Zohar, suggest that the mark of Cain was the letter [[Waw (letter)|vav]] ({{Script/Hebrew|ו}}).<ref name="Zohar_Parshat_Bereshit">{{cite web|url=https://www.zohar.com/zohar/Bereshit%20A/chapters/48 |title=Bereshit A: Chapter 48 |publisher=Zohar.com |access-date=2020-09-01}}]</ref>
===Interpretations based on race===


===Christianity===
====Early Christian interpretations====
According to some scholars, some early interpretations of the Bible in [[Syriac Christianity]] combined the "curse" with the "mark", and interpreted the curse of Cain as black skin. (Goldenberg, p. 180). Relying on rabbinic texts, it is argued, the Syriacs interpreted a passage in [[Book of Genesis]] 4:5 ("And Cain was greatly saddened and his face fell") as implying that Cain underwent a permanent change in skin color. (''Id.'')


According to author Ruth Mellinkoff, commentators' interpretations of the nature of the "mark" depended on their views regarding the status of Cain, as either being given additional time to repent or as being further shamed.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hl4cspVFWmMC&pg=PA5 |last=Mellinkoff |first=Ruth |title=The Mark of Cain |page=13 |publisher=University of California Press |year=1981 |isbn=9780520906372}}</ref>
====The curse as a justification for the African slave trade====
The curse of Cain has been used as an explanation for the dark skin shades of people in various parts of [[Africa]], and a justification for [[racism]] and [[slavery]], and a ban in [[interracial marriage]]. These racial implications are closely linked to the related implications derived from the [[curse of Ham]] doctrine, which has a much longer history, and has often been combined (or some would say conflated) with the curse of Cain doctrine, as well as the "curse of Esau" doctrine.


=== American Protestant racial beliefs on the mark of Cain===
An early American reference to the curse of Cain doctrine in the context of modern racial issues was in a poem by [[Phyllis Wheatley]], herself a black slave, who wrote in [[1773]], "Remember Christians, Negoes black as Cain/May be refined and joined the angelic train".
At some point after the start of the [[Slavery in the United States|slave trade in the United States]], many{{citation needed|date=February 2016}} [[Protestantism|Protestant]] denominations began teaching the belief that the mark of Cain was a dark skin tone in an attempt to justify their actions, although early descriptions of [[Romani people|Romani]] as "descendants of Cain" written by [[Franciscan]] friar [[Symon Semeonis]] suggest that this belief had existed for some time. Protestant preachers wrote exegetical analyses of the curse, with the assumption that it was dark skin.<ref>Priest, Josiah [https://archive.org/stream/slaveryasitrela00priegoog#page/n136/mode/2up/search/Cain ''Slavery as it Relates to the Negro or African Race''] (1843)</ref>


====Baptist segregationists====
====Adoption of the doctrine by some Protestant groups====
The split between the Northern and Southern [[Baptists|Baptist]] organizations arose over doctrinal issues pertaining to [[slavery]] and the education of slaves. At the time of the split, the [[Southern Baptist Convention|Southern Baptist]] group used the curse of Cain as a justification for slavery. Some 19th- and 20th-century Baptist ministers in the [[Southern United States]] taught the belief that there were two separate heavens; one heaven was for [[Black people]], and another heaven was for [[White people]].<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.emmetttillmurder.com/Ebony%201956.htm |title= Land of the Till Murder |magazine= [[Ebony (magazine)|Ebony]] |date= April 1956 |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20050311114146/http://www.emmetttillmurder.com/Ebony%201956.htm |archive-date= 2005-03-11 }}</ref> Southern Baptists either taught or practiced various forms of [[racial segregation]] well into the mid-20th century, though members of all races were accepted at worship services.{{efn|
Most 19th and early 20th century [[Southern Baptist]] congregations in the southern [[United States]] taught that there were two separate heavens; one for blacks, and one for whites.
"Slaves were accepted as members in the same manner as whites were. After a slave expressed his or her desire to join a church, he or she was required to describe his or her religious experience. If the congregation was favorably impressed by one's testimony, the applicant was accepted into the fellowship and he or she was baptized. When black church members moved from one community to another, they were given letters of dismissal which they might place with another Baptist church.
:
Black church members worshiped in the sanctuary with whites, participated in the service of [[Eucharist|Holy Communion]], and contributed to help support the various programs of the denomination. Still blacks and females in antebellum Baptist churches held a membership status subordinate to that of adult white males, since that group alone determined denominational policies and procedures.<ref name=Miller-Smith-1988>
{{cite book
|last1=Miller |first1=Randall M.
|last2=Smith |first2=John David
|year=1988
|title=Dictionary of Afro-American Slavery
|publisher=Greenwood Press
|place=Westport, CT
|isbn=0-313-23814-6 |page=[https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofafro00mill/page/78 78]
|url=https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofafro00mill/page/78
|url-access=registration |via=[[Internet Archive]] (archive.org)
}}</ref>
}}
In 1995, the [[Southern Baptist Convention]] officially denounced [[racism]] and it also apologized for its past defense of slavery.<ref>{{cite news |last=Kunnerth |first=Jeff |date=21 June 1995 |title=Baptists renounce racist past |newspaper=[[Orlando Sentinel]] |place=Orlando, FL |url=https://www.orlandosentinel.com/1995/06/21/baptists-renounce-racist-past/ |url-status=live |access-date=2012-04-27 |df=dmy-all |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140902071844/http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1995-06-21/news/9506210026_1_southern-baptist-northern-baptists-general-baptist |archive-date=2014-09-02 }}</ref>


The doctrine was used to support a ban on ordaining blacks to most protestant clergies until the 1960s in the U.S. and Europe. It is significant to note that the Coptic, Ethiopian, Orthodox, Thomasite and the Catholic church did not recognize these interpretations and did not participate in the religious movement to support them. Certain Catholic [[Diocese]] in the Southern United States did adopt a policy of not ordaining blacks to oversee, administer sacraments to, or accept confessions from white parishoners. This policy, was not based on a Curse of Cain teaching, but was justified by any possible perceptions of having slaves rule over their masters.
The curse of Cain was used to support a ban on ordaining Black people to most Protestant clergies until the 1960s in both the United States and Europe.{{citation needed|date=September 2015}} However, the majority of Christian churches in the world, including the [[Catholic Church]], [[Eastern Orthodox]] churches, [[Anglican]] churches, and [[Oriental Orthodox]] churches, did not recognize the racist interpretations and did not participate in the religious movement to exclude Black people from ministry.


One exception was that certain Catholic [[diocese]]s in the Southern United States independently adopted a policy of not permitting Black people to oversee, administer [[sacraments]] to, nor accept confessions from White parishioners.{{citation needed|date=June 2023}} The justification for this policy was not excused by the espousal of a "curse of Cain" doctrine, instead, it was justified by the widely held perception among southern clergy and congregations that it would offend too many White parishioners if slaves or their descendants had any authority over White people – the race of their former masters and still their presumptive superiors.{{citation needed|date=June 2023}} This was neither approved by a [[Pope]] nor derived from any papal teaching.<ref name=Miller-Smith-1988/>{{Failed verification|date=February 2024}}
Until the mid-20th century, nearly all Protestant groups in America had supported the notion that black slavery, oppression, and African colonization was the result of God's curse on people with black skin or of African descent through Cain, or through the [[Curse of Ham]].


====The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints====
====Curse of Ham====
{{Further|Curse of Ham#Racism and slavery}}
{{main|Blacks and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints}}
The Curse of Cain was often conflated with the [[Curse of Ham]]. According to the Bible, [[Ham (son of Noah)|Ham]] discovered his father [[Noah]] drunk and naked in his tent, but instead of honoring his father by covering his nakedness, he ran and told his brothers about it. Because of this, Noah cursed Ham's son, [[Canaan (son of Ham)|Canaan]], by saying that he was to be "a servant of servants" ({{bibleverse|Genesis|9:20–27|KJV}}). One interpretation of this passage states that Ham married a descendant of Cain. While there is no indication in the Bible of Ham's wife descending from Cain, this interpretation was used to justify slavery and it was particularly popular in North America during the [[Atlantic slave trade]] due to interpretations identifying Ham as the progenitor of the people of Africa.<ref name=AmericanHam>Benjamin Braude, "The Sons of Noah and the Construction of Ethnic and Geographical Identities in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods", ''William and Mary Quarterly'' LIV (January 1997): 103–42. See also William McKee Evans, "From the Land of Canaan to the Land of Guinea: The Strange Odyssey of the Sons of Ham", ''American Historical Review'' 85 (February 1980): 15–43. {{JSTOR|1853423}}.</ref><ref name="Swift Superstition">John N. Swift and Gigen Mammoser, "Out of the Realm of Superstition: Chesnutt's 'Dave's Neckliss' and the Curse of Ham", ''American Literary Realism'', vol. 42 no. 1, Fall 2009, 3</ref>


===Latter Day Saint movement===
[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]], the largest sect of the [[Latter Day Saint movement]] was founded during the height of the curse of Cain teaching by White American Christian organizations in America. Mormon church leaders however went one step further and canonized Mormon scriptures and doctrines that further justified racist policies against those of African descent based on Cain's curse being on Black people. Although the Mormon establishment had allowed Black people into their church and even a few were ordained as priests, the Cain interpretation was codified throughout the 19th and 20th century.
{{main|Curses of Cain and Ham and the LDS Church}}
{{see also|Black people and Mormonism|Mormon teachings on skin color}}


[[Mormonism]] began during the height of Protestant acceptance of the curse of Cain doctrine in North America, as well as the even more popular [[curse of Ham]] doctrine. Like many North Americans,<ref name=AmericanHam /><ref name="Swift Superstition" /> [[Mormons]] of the 19th century commonly assumed that Black Africans had Cain's "mark" of black skin,<ref name=Marks>{{cite journal |last1=Stuart Bingham |first1=Ryan |title=Curses and Marks: Racial Dispensations and Dispensations of Race in Joseph Smith's Bible Revision and the Book of Abraham |journal=[[Journal of Mormon History]] |date=July 2015 |volume=41 |issue=3 |publisher=[[University of Illinois Press]] |page=27 |doi=10.5406/jmormhist.41.3.22 |jstor=10.5406/jmormhist.41.3.22 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jmormhist.41.3.22|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref name=Teachings>{{cite book |last1=Collier |first1=Fred C. |title=The Teachings of President Brigham Young Vol. 3 1852–1854 |date=1987 |publisher=Collier Publishing |location=Salt Lake City |isbn=9780934964012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LkRZGQ8oO8IC|via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref>{{rp|p=42}} and Ham's curse to be servants of servants.<ref name=SmithHam>{{cite wikisource |title=Latter Day Saints' Messenger and Advocate/Volume 2/Number 7/Letter to Oliver Cowdery from Joseph Smith, Jr. (Apr. 1836) |last=Smith |first=Joseph |year=1836 |pages=290}}</ref> [[Brigham Young]] both taught that Black people were cursed descendants of Cain, and used it to justify slavery.<ref name="Reeve 2015">{{cite book|last1=Reeve|first1=W. Paul|title=Religion of a Different Color: Race and the Mormon Struggle for Whiteness|date=2015|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=95j4BQAAQBAJ|location=New York, New York|isbn=978-0-19-975407-6|via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref>{{rp|125–126}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Taylor |author1-link=Quintard Taylor|first1=Quintard |title=In Search of the Racial Frontier: African Americans in the American West 1528–1990 |date=17 May 1999 |publisher=[[W. W. Norton & Company]] |location=New York City |isbn=9780393318890 |page=73 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=83GLAwAAQBAJ|quote=Brigham Young spoke for many Saints in 1863 when he assessed the Civil War raging in the East: 'One portion of the country wish [sic] to raise their ... black slaves and the other wish [sic] to free them, and apparently to almost worship them.... Who cares? ... Ham will continue to be the servant of servants, as the Lord has decreed, until the curse is removed.'|via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref><ref name="Harris2015">{{cite book|last1=Harris|first1=Matthew L.|last2=Bringhurst|first2=Newell G.|title=The Mormon Church and Blacks: A Documentary History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pn20CgAAQBAJ&pg=PAiii|date=2015|publisher=[[University of Illinois Press]]|location=Chicago|isbn=978-0-252-08121-7|page=22|via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> In the [[Pearl of Great Price (Mormonism)|Pearl of Great Price]], considered scripture by most adherents of the [[Latter Day Saint movement]], [[Enoch (ancestor of Noah)#In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints theology|Enoch]] talks about shunning the descendants of Cain and that they had black skin:<ref>{{cite book |last=Kidd |first=Colin |title=The Forging of Races: Race and Scripture in the Protestant Atlantic World, 1600–2000 |year=2006 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0521793247 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aNT3q1HjY_MC&pg=PA236|via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> "And Enoch also beheld the residue of the people which were the sons of Adam; and they were a mixture of all the seed of Adam save it was the seed of Cain, for the seed of Cain were black, and had not place among them." ({{lds|Moses|moses|7|22}}) Church president [[Brigham Young]] stated, "What is the mark? You will see it on the countenance of every African you ever did see...."<ref name=Teachings/>{{rp|p=42}}<ref>{{cite archive |first=George D. |last=Watt |item =Brigham Young, 1852 February 5 |item-url=https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/assets/c87f81ec-019c-4962-b395-d7c1c925fa61/0/2 |type= |item-id=CR 100 317 |date=5 Feb 1852 |page=2|collection=Historian's Office reports of speeches, 1845–1885 |collection-url=https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/record/73160837-a293-4121-b723-41387a081cb8/|institution=LDS Church History Library |location =Salt Lake City}}</ref>
Mormon leaders used passages from the King James Version of the [[Bible]], the [[Joseph Smith Translation]] of the Bible, [[Book of Moses]], to fuel the rhetoric of the "Curse of Cain" and the "[[Curse of Ham]]" between 1835 and 1970 (for a side by side comparison of the Pearl of Great Price's teachings and the KJV of the Bible's Genesis' teachings of the Curse of Cain see [[Curse of Cain/Genesis]]). The rhetoric centered around blacks being cursed of God in regard to the priesthood, their servitude to whites, their status in spiritual matters, and other issues. They had taught that the cursing would one day be lifted once spiritual blessings had been distributed to the white members of the religion.


As related by [[Abraham O. Smoot]] after his death, [[apostle (Latter Day Saints)|apostle]] [[David W. Patten]] said he encountered a Black man in [[Paris, Tennessee]], who said that he was [[Cain and Abel|Cain]]. The account states that Cain had earnestly sought death but was denied it, and that his mission was to destroy the souls of men.<ref name="Wilson 1904">{{harvnb|Wilson|1904}}</ref><ref name="Whiting 2003">{{harvnb|Whiting|2003}}</ref>{{rp|85}} The recollection of Patten's story is quoted in apostle [[Spencer W. Kimball]]'s ''[[The Miracle of Forgiveness]]''.
Church leaders, including Young, taught that the curse of Cain consists of several parts (for a list of statements by LDS Church leaders specifically about the Curse of Cain see [[Curse of Cain/LDS historical statements]]):
#That Cain would not be allowed to enter God's presence, nor would he enjoy the companionship of any member of the Godhead
#That Cain would be called [[Perdition]] and not be resurrected to a degree of glory; He would lose any chance of exaltation
#That Cain would not taste of death (become a translated being)
#That the earth would not "yield unto [[Cain]] her strength," (or in other words, he would be agriculturally cursed)
#That a mark would be placed upon Cain so that others would not try to kill him
#That this mark was "Black skin and a flat nose".
#That Cain would have to live as "a vagabond" on the earth until the return of Christ as a translated being
#That Cain would rule over [[Satan]] after the final judgement
#That any mixing of Blacks with any others, would pass the curse upon any of their descendants.
#The denial of the priesthood and temple ordinances to Cain and his descendants, those being of Black African descent (except in rare occasions), until after Abel's descendants had a chance to receive the gospel and hold the priesthood. No blessing would be denied these people after the resurrection, but it would be denied in this life.


Although not explicitly stated in [[standard works|Latter-day Saint scripture]], at least one publication of the largest denomination in Mormonism, [[the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] (LDS Church), still teaches that Ham's wife was a descendant of Cain. Its "Guide to the Scriptures," published as an explanatory companion to the scriptures, states "Ham's wife, Egyptus, was a descendant of Cain; the sons of their daughter Egyptus settled in Egypt".<ref name="ham">{{cite web|title=Guide to the Scriptures – Ham|url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/gs/ham?lang=eng&clang=eng}}</ref>
Note that the part of the curse that would be passed on to his descendents would be the mark, and the denial of priesthood and temple ordinances until after the resurrection.


====Temple and priesthood ban====
Some quotes by Brigham Young in regards to the descendants of Cain are as follows:
{{Main|Black people and temple and priesthood policies in the LDS Church}}


There is evidence which proves that [[Joseph Smith]] did not consider the ban on Black men to the [[priesthood (Latter Day Saints)|priesthood]] to be relevant in modern times, since he himself (and other church leaders close to him) ordained Black men into it,<ref>{{cite web|title=Black History Timeline|url=http://www.blacklds.org/history|work=BlackLDS.org|access-date=17 January 2013}}</ref> notably [[Elijah Abel]] and [[Walker Lewis]].
Again to the subject before us; as to The men bearing rule; not one of the children of old Cain, have one partical of right to bear Rule in Government affairs from first to last, they have no buisness there....I will not consent for one moment to have an african dictate me or any brethren with regard to Church or State Government. I may vary in my veiwes from others, and they may think I am foolish in the things I have spoken, and think that they know more than I do, but I know I know more than they do. If the Africans cannot bear rule in the Church of God, what buisness have they to bear rule in the State and Government affairs of this Territory or any others?


After the [[death of Joseph Smith]], [[Brigham Young]] (the second [[President of the Church (LDS Church)|President of the Church]]) accepted the idea that people of African ancestry were generally under the curse of Cain, and in 1852, he stated that people of Black African descent were not eligible to hold the church's priesthood.<ref>[[Wilford Woodruff]], Diary of Wilford Woodruff, January 16, 1852. "[A]ny man having one drop of the seed of [Cain] … in him cannot hold the priesthood and if no other Prophet ever spake it before I will say it now in the name of Jesus Christ".</ref> Young taught that in the [[war in heaven]], both Cain and Abel were leaders. The spirits of Black people fought under Cain and were assigned to be Cain's descendants. Those that fought under Abel were assigned to be Abel's descendants. Cain hoped that by killing his brother, the spirits that were under him would have an advantage over the spirits under Abel. However, God cursed Cain and his descendants not to have the priesthood until all of Abel's descendants had the priesthood. The spirits of Black people understood this and stood with Cain and accepted the punishment.<ref name="Neither White Nor Black" >{{cite book |editor1-last= Bush |editor1-first= Lester E. Jr. |editor1-link=Lester E. Bush Jr.|editor2-last= Mauss |editor2-first= Armand L. |editor2-link= Armand L. Mauss |title= Neither White Nor Black: Mormon Scholars Confront the Race Issue in a Universal Church |publisher= [[Signature Books]] |year= 1984 |location= Salt Lake City |url= http://signaturebookslibrary.org/?p=438 |isbn= 0-941214-22-2|quote=Cain, in murdering Abel, had 'deprived his brother of the privilege of pursuing his journey through life, and of extending his kingdom by multiplying upon the earth.' Cain had reportedly hoped thereby to gain an advantage over Abel—the number of one's posterity somehow being important in the overall scheme of things. Brigham Young further explained that those who were to have been Abel's descendants had already been assigned to his lineage, and if they were ever to come "into the world in the regular way, they would have to come through him." In order that Cain's posterity not gain an advantage the Lord denied them the priesthood until such time as "the class of spirits presided over by Abel should have the privilege of coming into the world." Those spirits formerly under Cain's leadership were reportedly aware of the implications of this decision, yet "still looked up to him, and rather than forsake him they were willing to bear his burdens and share the penalty imposed upon him."}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=Mormonism's Negro Doctrine: An Historical Overview |url=https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/mormonisms-negro-doctrine-an-historical-overview/|journal=[[Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought|Dialogue]] |page=253|publisher=[[University of Illinois Press]]|year=2001}}</ref>
What we are trying to do to day is to make the Negro equal with us in all our privilege. My voice shall be against all the day long.


The ban on the priesthood affected Black members differently than it did in other churches because the LDS Church has a [[Laity|lay]] priesthood in which virtually all worthy male members become priesthood holders.


Several of Young's successors defended the priesthood ban as being a result of the curse of Cain, though some disagreed. [[Sterling M. McMurrin]] reported that, in 1954, church president [[David O. McKay]] said: "There is not now, and there never has been a doctrine in this church that the negroes are under a divine curse. There is no doctrine in the church of any kind pertaining to the negro. We believe that we have a scriptural precedent for withholding the priesthood from the negro. It is a practice, not a doctrine, and the practice someday will be changed. And that's all there is to it."<ref>Sterling M. McMurrin affidavit, March 6, 1979. See ''[[David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism]]'' by [[Greg Prince]] and [[William Robert Wright]], p.{{page needed|date=September 2012}}. Quoted by [http://www.ldsgenesisgroup.com/howtoreach.html Genesis Group] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110713192439/http://www.ldsgenesisgroup.com/howtoreach.html |date=2011-07-13 }}</ref>
Joseph Smith, Jr. and some other early church leaders claimed to have see Cain in open vision on a few occasions, and described his mark. The wording used to descibe the encounters (including the word hairy) has led to some jokes and light [[urban legends]] about Cain being [[Bigfoot]] within the Mormon culture.


In 1978, LDS Church president [[Spencer W. Kimball]] reported receiving [[1978 Revelation on Priesthood|a revelation]] from God allowing all worthy male members of the church to receive the priesthood without regard to race or color.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lds.org/churchhistory/presidents/controllers/potcController.jsp?leader=12&topic=events |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040828161003/http://www.lds.org/churchhistory/presidents/controllers/potcController.jsp?leader=12&topic=events |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-08-28 |title= Spencer W. Kimball – Significant Events |publisher= churchofjesuschrist.org |access-date= 2012-09-21}}</ref><ref>{{citation |url= https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/od/2?lang=eng |title= Official Declaration 2 }} (LDS [[standard works]]); see also: [[Official Declaration 2]]</ref> Although the church had previously been criticized for its policy during the [[civil rights movement]], the change seems to have been prompted by problems facing mixed-race converts in [[Brazil]].<ref>{{Cite book |first= Richard |last= Bushman |author-link= Richard Bushman |year= 2008 |title=
Although many Mormon scholarly and laypeople assert that the mark or curse was not related to Black people, Mormon prophets and leaders invariably attest throughout the period that the Curse of Cain was indeed, delegated to the Black people of the world, indicating that this was not folk-doctrine, but offical church doctrinal policy.
Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6m059lR04IoC |via=[[Google Books]] |pages= 111–112 |publisher= [[Oxford University Press]] |isbn= 978-0-19-531030-6 }}</ref>


Many Black church members think that giving an apology would be a "detriment" to church work and a catalyst for further racial misunderstanding. [[African Americans|African-American]] church member Bryan E. Powell says: "There is no pleasure in old news, and this news is old." Gladys Newkirk agrees, stating: "I've never experienced any problems in this church. I don't need an apology [...] We're the result of an apology."<ref>{{cite news |first= Bill |last= Broadway |newspaper= [[The Washington Post]] |date= 1998-05-30 |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1998/05/30/black-mormons-resist-apology-talk/7cedb3ac-e01a-48e7-a855-530cb3eb4e30/ |title= Black Mormons Resist Apology Talk|location=Washington D.C.}}</ref> Many Black Mormons say that they are willing to look beyond the former teachings and cleave to the doctrines of the church, in part because of its powerful, detailed teachings on life after death.<ref name=Ramirez2005>{{cite news |url= https://www.chicagotribune.com/2005/07/26/mormon-past-steeped-in-racism/ |title= Mormon past steeped in racism: Some black members want church to denounce racist doctrines |first= Margaret |last= Ramirez |date= 2005-07-26 |newspaper= [[Chicago Tribune]] |location=Chicago, Illinois}}</ref>
:"What is that mark? you will see it on the countenance of every African you ever did see upon the face of the earth, or ever will see... I tell you, this people that are commonly called negroes are the children of old Cain." - Brigham Young 1852


The LDS Church has issued an official statement about past practices and theories regarding skin color, stating: "[t]oday, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, [...] Church leaders today unequivocally condemn all racism, past and present, in any form."<ref name=Essay>{{citation |url= https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/topics/race-and-the-priesthood |title= Race and the Priesthood|publisher= [[LDS Church]] }}</ref>
:“You see some classes of the human family that are black are uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, and seemingly without the blessing of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind.. Cain slew his brother.. And the Lord put a mark on him, which is a flat nose and a black skin" - Brigham Young


====Civil rights====
====Modern Christian reactions against racial interpretations====
{{See also|History of slavery in Utah|Mormonism and slavery|Civil rights and Mormonism|Black segregation and the LDS Church}}
More recently, there has been a stronger Christian backlash against use of the curse of Cain doctrine in racial politics. Today, all of the mutually recognizeable Christian denominations flatly reject such a doctrine. Most Christians also point to Biblical references which refute the doctrine, including a reference in the [[Book of Numbers]]:


When Utah was considering the legalization of slavery, Brigham Young told the Utah Territorial Legislature that the curse of Cain required slavery. He argued that until all of the descendants of Abel have access to the priesthood, all of the descendants of Cain should remain in servitude.<ref name=Teachings/>{{rp|28}} He argued that because they did not have the right to govern the affairs of the Church due to the priesthood ban, they also should not have the right to govern the affairs of the state, including the right to vote.<ref name=Teachings />{{rp|47}} He warned that if they made the children of Cain equal to them, they would be cursed.<ref name=Teachings />{{rp|48}} He also argued that if someone married a descendant of Cain, that they would also have the same curse.<ref name=Teachings />{{rp|48}} The church has since repudiated all of these teachings.<ref name=Essay/>
:"And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman...9 And the anger of the LORD was kindled against them; and he departed. 10 And the cloud departed from off the tabernacle; and, behold, Miriam became leprous, white as snow: and Aaron looked upon Miriam, and, behold, she was leprous." (Numbers 12:1, 9, 10).


==See also==
Other Christian arguments include the following:
*[[Ashwatthama]]
#That the passage in Genesis relating to Cain makes no mention of the effects on his descendants.
*[[Badge of shame]]
#That the effect of parts of the curse on the land could have only applied to Cain - and not Blacks - who historically, were unaffected (like all other surviving people) in their ability to cultivate land. If this interpretation held true - 19th Century Americans would not have enslaved them to do agricultural work in the United States.
*[[Cain tradition]]
#That Moses' wife Tzipporah, Job, Queen of Sheba, Ebed-Melech, Tirharkah, and the Ethiopian Treasurer of Queen Candace, Hagar, Egyptians, and other Black people in the Bible were not mentioned as being partakers of the curse. Had the curse affected Black people, at least one instance of it would have been mentioned in the Bible in that context to these people.
*[[Castration]]
#That Christianity and the Bible was founded 2000 years ago, and early documents do not make any references to blacks being cursed, and no manuscripts have been found in the middle east by Christian leaders of those periods that support the exclusion or prejudice against Blacks, Ethiopians (Greek word for Black) or Kushites (hebrew word for Black).
*[[Curse of Ham]]
#That the racist interpretations of scripture did not exist before European colonization. These interpretations were likely introduced by ethnocentric ideologies that were codified into the Western mindset. This ideology adversely influenced the protestant reformation and enlightment period.
*[[Historical race concepts]]
#That objectively making the idea of a Cain's mark into a change of skin color would require Biblical passages to equate the two, however, in the [[Book of Jeremiah]] 13:23, there is a distinction made between skin color and marks on the skin, which all but refutes the idea that Cain's mark was Black skin: ("Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots?"). Some Bible code groups claim they have identified that the mark of the curse of Cain was the sign of the cross on his forhead. [http://www.hiddencodes.com/the_mark_of_cain.htm]
*[[Mark of the beast]]
#That one effect of the curse was for Cain to struggle agriculturally, to be "driven" from the face of the Lord and that Cain would not settle in any specific locale. For Canaan's curse it was to serve the people of Shem's line. Making the curse a racially-based issue ignored the primary issues of the curse and was used to justify black servitude to whites. The doctrine became part of the institution of slavery and reasoning of many racist white Christian institutions in the West.
*[[Pre-Adamite]]
*[[Serpent seed]]


==Footnotes==
=====Modern Baptist exegesis=====
{{notelist}}
Some Baptist denominations now deny that Cain was cursed by God, but rather Cain brought the cursing on himself. "God does not say, 'Now I curse you.' He simply states the truth, 'Now you are cursed'".[http://eis.net.au/~paulh/gen8hp.html] In this way, Cain's aggression was the curse, and the outcome was the death of Abel. Because of continued problems with anger and aggression, the curse was handed down to Cain's posterity and even to Lamech who killed similarly to Cain.


== References ==
In the same way, the teaching goes that [[Born Again]] believers are often cursed because of some of their stuggles or [[sins]], and should work to overcome them, or they will be passed on to their children or descendants. If they do so, their curses will not be promulgated to their posterity.
=== Citations ===
{{Reflist}}


=====Catholic exegesis=====
=== Sources ===
{{refbegin}}
The [[Catholic]] Church teaches that the curse of Cain was given by the earth, not God, to Cain, as a punishment for having to "opened its mouth and drunk the blood of thy brother." The Church teaches that Cain's punishment was not having to wander, as he founded a City, but that he wouldn't have the "strengh" of the earth in his agricultural endeavors, but that the Earth would still produce for him. The Church also teaches that he was to be banished from the land of his parents as a result of his curse.
* {{cite book |last= Byron |first = John |title = Cain and Abel in text and tradition: Jewish and Christian interpretations of the first sibling rivalry |publisher= [[Brill Publishers]] |year= 2011 |location = Leiden |isbn = 978-9004192522 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=NnnVmbnE-TcC&pg=PA93 |page = 93 }}
* {{cite book |last = Goldenberg |first = David M. |title = The curse of Ham : race and slavery in early Judaism, Christianity, and Islam |year= 2003 |publisher= [[Princeton University Press]] |location= Princeton [u.a.] |isbn = 069111465X |edition = 2nd printing. |chapter = The Curse of Cain |author-link = David Goldenberg }}
As for the mark of the curse, the Catholic Encyclopedia states, "No indication as regards the nature of this sign is given us."
*{{Cite book |last=Whiting |first=Linda Shelley |title=David W. Patten Apostle and Martyr |publisher=Cedar Fort |location=Springville, UT |year=2003 |isbn=1-55517-682-8 |oclc=51293310}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wilson |first=Lycurgus A |title=Life of David W. Patten: The first Apostolic martyr |publisher=[[Deseret News]] |year=1904 |orig-year=1900 |url=https://archive.org/details/lifeofdavidwpatt00wilsrich |lccn=44013747 |oclc=4922706}}


{{refend}}
====Modern supporters of the racial curse of Cain doctrine====
Denominations that still teach the doctrine include the [[Aryan World Church]] and [[New Christian Crusade Church]], both considered to be extensions of White Supremacist organizations and hate groups.


== Further reading ==
===Anti-Semitic interpretations===
* {{cite book |last= Bringhurst |first= Newell |title= Saints, Slaves, and Blacks: The changing place of Black people within Mormonism |url= https://archive.org/details/saintsslavesblac0000brin |url-access= registration |publisher= Greenwood Press |year= 1981 |isbn= 9780313227523 }}
Some racist groups, such as [[Stormfront]] White Nationalist Community believe that the curse of Cain was for him and his descendants to have to wander without a permanent home. According to this interpretation, they believe that Esau and his descendants was also given this curse (See Genesis 27:38, 40), and had to wander without a homeland.
* {{cite book | last=Bush | first=Lester E. Jr. |author2= Armand Mauss |title= Neither White Nor Black: Mormon Scholars Confront the Race Issue in a Universal Church |publisher= Signature Books |year= 1984 |isbn= 0-941214-22-2 |url= http://www.signaturebookslibrary.org/neither/neithertitle.htm |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051122235710/http://www.signaturebookslibrary.org/neither/neithertitle.htm |archive-date= 2005-11-22 |author2-link= Armand Mauss }}

* {{cite book |last= Nottingham |first= Theodore J. |title= The Curse of Cain: The Untold Story of John Wilkes Booth |year= 1998 |publisher= Sovereign Publications |isbn = 1-58006-021-8 }}
They believe that modern Jews also have this curse for the murder of Christ, resulting in the [[Diaspora]]. [http://www.stormfront.org/archive/t-100205.html]
* {{cite book |last= Schwartz |first= Regina M. |title= The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism |publisher= University of Chicago Press |year= 1997 |isbn= 0-226-74199-0 |url-access= registration |url= https://archive.org/details/curseofcainviole00schw }}

* {{cite book |author= University of Michigan |title= White Attitudes toward Black People |publisher= Institute for Social Research of the University of Michigan |year= 1971 |asin=B000TA1IZW }}
==References==
* {{cite book |last= Wood |first= Peter H. |title= Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina from 1670 Through the Stono Rebellion |year= 1996 |publisher= W. W. Norton |isbn= 0-393-31482-0 }}
*{{Book reference | Author=Regina M. Schwartz | Title=The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism | Publisher =Univ. of Chicago Press | Year=1997 | ID=ISBN 0226741990 }}
*{{Book reference | Author=David M. Goldenberg | Title=The Curse of Ham: Race and Slavery in Early Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (Jews, Christians, and Muslims from the Ancient to the Modern World) | Publisher=Princeton Univ. Press | Year=2003 | ID=ISBN 0-691-11465-X }}, Chapter 13: "The Curse of Cain".
*The Curse of Cain: The Untold Story of John Wilkes Booth (ISBN 1580060218)
*Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina from 1670 Through the Stono Rebellion, by Peter H. Wood
*White Attitudes toward Black People (Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, 1971), by Angus Campbell
*"The Fading of the Pharoah's Curse: The Decline and Fall of the Priesthood Ban against Blacks in the Mormon Church," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 14:3 (Fall 1981)
*"Saints, Slaves, and Blacks: The changing place of Black people within Mormonism," Greenwood Press, (1981), by Newell Bringhurst


==External links==
==External links==
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03142b.htm Catholic Encyclopedia entry on Cain]
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03142b.htm Catholic Encyclopedia entry on Cain]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060625205845/http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefAuxArt.aspx?refid=1741580587 Encarta article that discusses race and religion in 1969]
*[http://www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9712/reviews/alison.html Review of the book "Curse of Cain"]
*[http://www.creationtheory.org/BiblicalMorality/Racism.shtml Biblical Morality: Racism]
*[http://eis.net.au/~paulh/gen8hp.html Baptist sermon on the curse of Cain]
*[http://www.emmetttillmurder.com/Ebony%201956.htm Sermon on seperate heavens and race relations in Mississippi]
*[http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefAuxArt.aspx?refid=1741580587 Encarta article that discusses race and religioun in 1969]
*[http://www.creationtheory.org/BiblicalMorality/Racism.shtml Biblical racism]
*[http://www.patriotist.com/abarch/ab20020527.htm Reparations "demanded" by some Blacks of churches for racist teachings]
*[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/08/29/nbish29.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/08/29/ixportaltop.html Church of England issues dealing with race]
*[http://www.polis.iupui.edu/RUC/Newsletters/Clergy/vol3no3.htm Religion and race in Indianapolis]
*[http://www.religioustolerance.org/lds_beli.htm ReligiousTolerance.org discussion of Mormon views on Blacks and slavery]
*[http://www.blacklds.org/mauss.html Discussion of LDS views on blacks by a black Mormon]
*[http://www.blacklds.org/black_myth.html Discussion of cultural myths about the LDS Church by a Black Mormon]
*[http://www.xmission.com/~country/reason/black_1.htm A critical look at Mormon sermons on Blacks]
*[http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQRace.shtml#history A response to critical approaches to Blacks and Mormonsim]
*[http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1077/is_n4_v49/ai_14781982 Article on Blacks in the Bible]
*[http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/ihy001211.html Discussion of Mormon expulsion from Missouri]
*[http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefArticle.aspx?refid=761563653&pn=10 Discussion of Anti-slavery views of Missouri Mormons in Encarta]
*[http://www.sover.net/~barback/ot/mormons.html More about the expulsion from Missouri and Anti-slavery views of Mormons in Missouri]
*[http://www.kcstar.com/millennium/stories/ldsps.htm More about Mormons anti-slavery beliefs]
*[http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2004/2004-02-53.html A review of The Curse of Ham-Race and Slavery in Early Judaism, Christianity, and Islam]


{{Cain and Abel}}
{{Religion and slavery}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Curse And Mark Of Cain}}
[[Category:Hebrew Bible/Tanakh]]
[[Category:Racism]]
[[Category:Curses]]
[[Category:Mormonism]]
[[Category:Cain and Abel]]
[[Category:Christianity and race]]
[[Category:Judaism and slavery]]
[[Category:Mormonism and race]]
[[Category:Segregationist theology]]

Latest revision as of 06:06, 31 May 2025

Cain, 1896, by Henri Vidal, Jardin des Tuileries, Paris

The curse of Cain and the mark of Cain are phrases that originated in the story of Cain and Abel in the Book of Genesis. In the stories, if someone harmed Cain, the damage would come back sevenfold. Some interpretations view this as a physical mark, whereas other interpretations see the "mark" as a sign, and not as a physical mark on Cain himself. The King James Version of the Bible reads "set a mark upon Cain".

Origins

[edit]

There is no clear consensus as to what Cain's mark was.[1] The word translated as "mark" in Genesis 4:15 is א֔וֹת‎ ('ōṯ), which could mean a sign, omen, warning, remembrance, motion, gesture, agreement, miracle, wonder, or, most commonly, a letter. In the Torah, the same word is used to describe the stars as signs or omens (Genesis 1:14), the rainbow as the sign of God's promise never again to destroy his creation with a flood (Genesis 9:12), circumcision as a token of God's covenant with Abraham (Genesis 17:11), and the miracles performed by Moses before the Pharaoh (Exodus 4:8,9,17,28; 7:3; 8:23; 10:1,2).

Curse of Cain

[edit]
Glasgow Botanic Gardens. Kibble Palace. Edwin Roscoe MullinsCain or My Punishment is Greater than I can Bear (Genesis 4:13), about 1899.
Print by Wilhelm Groß of Cain with mark of a Chi Rho (1956/57).

The narrative of the curse of Cain is found in the text of Genesis 4:11–16. The curse was the result of Cain murdering his brother, Abel, and lying about the murder to God.[2] When Cain spilled his brother's blood, the earth became cursed as soon as the blood hit the ground. In a sense, the earth was left "drinking Abel's blood".[3] Genesis 4:12 gives a two-part sentencing for Cain's curse. The first concerns the earth that was cursed by Abel's blood.[4] Should Cain attempt to farm the land, the earth would not yield produce for him. This may imply why he went on to build cities,[5] namely the City of Enoch. The second part of the curse marks Cain as a fugitive (Hebrew: נע, romanizednā‘) and a wanderer (Hebrew: נד, romanizednāḏ). The combination making up this Hebrew phrase נע ונד‎, "fugitive and wanderer," is unique in the Hebrew Bible. Modern interpretations of the Hebrew verse 12 suggest that Cain went on to live a nomadic lifestyle and that he was also excluded from the family unit.[6] In the Septuagint, the emphasis on Cain's curse is dramatically increased by the combination of the Greek participles στένων καὶ τρέμων (stenōn kai tremōn, "groaning and shaking upon the earth").[7] Syriac Christianity[8] interprets the Greek version to mean that Cain experienced a real physical affliction[9] that would enable others to know who he was when they saw him. Philo interprets the Greek verse 12 as an allegory for Cain's fear of being soul-less. The Samaritan Pentateuch and the Targums translate the same verse to mean that Cain feared being "an exile and an unstable man".[10]

Mark of Cain

[edit]

The mark of Cain is God's promise to offer Cain divine protection from premature death with the stated purpose of preventing anyone from killing him. It is not known what the mark was, but it is assumed that the mark was visible.[11] Some have speculated that the mark was a Hebrew or Sumerian letter placed on either the face or the arm.[12] The Septuagint translates the mark as a "sign". Thus, it is speculated that the mark served as a sign to others not to commit the same offense.[13][14]

Judaism

[edit]

Abba Arika ("Rav") said that God gave Cain a dog, making him an example for murderers. Abba Jose ben Hanan said that God made a horn grow out of Cain. R. Hanin said that God made Cain an example to penitents (Gen. Rab. 22:12).[13]

Rashi (1:4) comments on Genesis 4:15 by saying that the mark was one of the Hebrew letters of the Tetragrammaton: "He engraved a letter of His [God's] Name onto his [Cain's] forehead."[15] The same statement about the Tetragrammaton was expressed by Targum Jonathan, Pirqé Rabbi Eliezer 21, and Zohar I.36b.[16]

In Kabbalah, the Zohar states that the mark of Cain was one of the twenty-two Hebrew letters of the Torah, although the Zohar's native Aramaic does not actually tell us which of the letters it was. Some commentators, such as Rabbi Michael Berg in his English commentary on the Zohar, suggest that the mark of Cain was the letter vav (ו‎).[17]

Christianity

[edit]

According to author Ruth Mellinkoff, commentators' interpretations of the nature of the "mark" depended on their views regarding the status of Cain, as either being given additional time to repent or as being further shamed.[18]

American Protestant racial beliefs on the mark of Cain

[edit]

At some point after the start of the slave trade in the United States, many[citation needed] Protestant denominations began teaching the belief that the mark of Cain was a dark skin tone in an attempt to justify their actions, although early descriptions of Romani as "descendants of Cain" written by Franciscan friar Symon Semeonis suggest that this belief had existed for some time. Protestant preachers wrote exegetical analyses of the curse, with the assumption that it was dark skin.[19]

Baptist segregationists

[edit]

The split between the Northern and Southern Baptist organizations arose over doctrinal issues pertaining to slavery and the education of slaves. At the time of the split, the Southern Baptist group used the curse of Cain as a justification for slavery. Some 19th- and 20th-century Baptist ministers in the Southern United States taught the belief that there were two separate heavens; one heaven was for Black people, and another heaven was for White people.[20] Southern Baptists either taught or practiced various forms of racial segregation well into the mid-20th century, though members of all races were accepted at worship services.[a] In 1995, the Southern Baptist Convention officially denounced racism and it also apologized for its past defense of slavery.[22]

The curse of Cain was used to support a ban on ordaining Black people to most Protestant clergies until the 1960s in both the United States and Europe.[citation needed] However, the majority of Christian churches in the world, including the Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox churches, Anglican churches, and Oriental Orthodox churches, did not recognize the racist interpretations and did not participate in the religious movement to exclude Black people from ministry.

One exception was that certain Catholic dioceses in the Southern United States independently adopted a policy of not permitting Black people to oversee, administer sacraments to, nor accept confessions from White parishioners.[citation needed] The justification for this policy was not excused by the espousal of a "curse of Cain" doctrine, instead, it was justified by the widely held perception among southern clergy and congregations that it would offend too many White parishioners if slaves or their descendants had any authority over White people – the race of their former masters and still their presumptive superiors.[citation needed] This was neither approved by a Pope nor derived from any papal teaching.[21][failed verification]

Curse of Ham

[edit]

The Curse of Cain was often conflated with the Curse of Ham. According to the Bible, Ham discovered his father Noah drunk and naked in his tent, but instead of honoring his father by covering his nakedness, he ran and told his brothers about it. Because of this, Noah cursed Ham's son, Canaan, by saying that he was to be "a servant of servants" (Genesis 9:20–27). One interpretation of this passage states that Ham married a descendant of Cain. While there is no indication in the Bible of Ham's wife descending from Cain, this interpretation was used to justify slavery and it was particularly popular in North America during the Atlantic slave trade due to interpretations identifying Ham as the progenitor of the people of Africa.[23][24]

Latter Day Saint movement

[edit]

Mormonism began during the height of Protestant acceptance of the curse of Cain doctrine in North America, as well as the even more popular curse of Ham doctrine. Like many North Americans,[23][24] Mormons of the 19th century commonly assumed that Black Africans had Cain's "mark" of black skin,[25][26]: 42  and Ham's curse to be servants of servants.[27] Brigham Young both taught that Black people were cursed descendants of Cain, and used it to justify slavery.[28]: 125–126 [29][30] In the Pearl of Great Price, considered scripture by most adherents of the Latter Day Saint movement, Enoch talks about shunning the descendants of Cain and that they had black skin:[31] "And Enoch also beheld the residue of the people which were the sons of Adam; and they were a mixture of all the seed of Adam save it was the seed of Cain, for the seed of Cain were black, and had not place among them." (Moses 7:22) Church president Brigham Young stated, "What is the mark? You will see it on the countenance of every African you ever did see...."[26]: 42 [32]

As related by Abraham O. Smoot after his death, apostle David W. Patten said he encountered a Black man in Paris, Tennessee, who said that he was Cain. The account states that Cain had earnestly sought death but was denied it, and that his mission was to destroy the souls of men.[33][34]: 85  The recollection of Patten's story is quoted in apostle Spencer W. Kimball's The Miracle of Forgiveness.

Although not explicitly stated in Latter-day Saint scripture, at least one publication of the largest denomination in Mormonism, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), still teaches that Ham's wife was a descendant of Cain. Its "Guide to the Scriptures," published as an explanatory companion to the scriptures, states "Ham's wife, Egyptus, was a descendant of Cain; the sons of their daughter Egyptus settled in Egypt".[35]

Temple and priesthood ban

[edit]

There is evidence which proves that Joseph Smith did not consider the ban on Black men to the priesthood to be relevant in modern times, since he himself (and other church leaders close to him) ordained Black men into it,[36] notably Elijah Abel and Walker Lewis.

After the death of Joseph Smith, Brigham Young (the second President of the Church) accepted the idea that people of African ancestry were generally under the curse of Cain, and in 1852, he stated that people of Black African descent were not eligible to hold the church's priesthood.[37] Young taught that in the war in heaven, both Cain and Abel were leaders. The spirits of Black people fought under Cain and were assigned to be Cain's descendants. Those that fought under Abel were assigned to be Abel's descendants. Cain hoped that by killing his brother, the spirits that were under him would have an advantage over the spirits under Abel. However, God cursed Cain and his descendants not to have the priesthood until all of Abel's descendants had the priesthood. The spirits of Black people understood this and stood with Cain and accepted the punishment.[38][39]

The ban on the priesthood affected Black members differently than it did in other churches because the LDS Church has a lay priesthood in which virtually all worthy male members become priesthood holders.

Several of Young's successors defended the priesthood ban as being a result of the curse of Cain, though some disagreed. Sterling M. McMurrin reported that, in 1954, church president David O. McKay said: "There is not now, and there never has been a doctrine in this church that the negroes are under a divine curse. There is no doctrine in the church of any kind pertaining to the negro. We believe that we have a scriptural precedent for withholding the priesthood from the negro. It is a practice, not a doctrine, and the practice someday will be changed. And that's all there is to it."[40]

In 1978, LDS Church president Spencer W. Kimball reported receiving a revelation from God allowing all worthy male members of the church to receive the priesthood without regard to race or color.[41][42] Although the church had previously been criticized for its policy during the civil rights movement, the change seems to have been prompted by problems facing mixed-race converts in Brazil.[43]

Many Black church members think that giving an apology would be a "detriment" to church work and a catalyst for further racial misunderstanding. African-American church member Bryan E. Powell says: "There is no pleasure in old news, and this news is old." Gladys Newkirk agrees, stating: "I've never experienced any problems in this church. I don't need an apology [...] We're the result of an apology."[44] Many Black Mormons say that they are willing to look beyond the former teachings and cleave to the doctrines of the church, in part because of its powerful, detailed teachings on life after death.[45]

The LDS Church has issued an official statement about past practices and theories regarding skin color, stating: "[t]oday, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, [...] Church leaders today unequivocally condemn all racism, past and present, in any form."[46]

Civil rights

[edit]

When Utah was considering the legalization of slavery, Brigham Young told the Utah Territorial Legislature that the curse of Cain required slavery. He argued that until all of the descendants of Abel have access to the priesthood, all of the descendants of Cain should remain in servitude.[26]: 28  He argued that because they did not have the right to govern the affairs of the Church due to the priesthood ban, they also should not have the right to govern the affairs of the state, including the right to vote.[26]: 47  He warned that if they made the children of Cain equal to them, they would be cursed.[26]: 48  He also argued that if someone married a descendant of Cain, that they would also have the same curse.[26]: 48  The church has since repudiated all of these teachings.[46]

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ "Slaves were accepted as members in the same manner as whites were. After a slave expressed his or her desire to join a church, he or she was required to describe his or her religious experience. If the congregation was favorably impressed by one's testimony, the applicant was accepted into the fellowship and he or she was baptized. When black church members moved from one community to another, they were given letters of dismissal which they might place with another Baptist church.
    Black church members worshiped in the sanctuary with whites, participated in the service of Holy Communion, and contributed to help support the various programs of the denomination. Still blacks and females in antebellum Baptist churches held a membership status subordinate to that of adult white males, since that group alone determined denominational policies and procedures.[21]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Thursby, Jacqueline S. (2013). "A Slave Tale: Closing an Anathema". NAAAS Conference Proceedings. National Association of African American Studies. ProQuest 1498460617.
  2. ^ Byron 2011, p. 93.
  3. ^ Byron 2011, p. 95: Genesis 4:11
  4. ^ Byron 2011, p. 97: Kugel, 163
  5. ^ Byron 2011, p. 97: Wenham, 108
  6. ^ Byron 2011, p. 97.
  7. ^ Byron 2011, p. 98: Brayford, 254
  8. ^ Byron 2011, p. 100.
  9. ^ Byron 2011, p. 98: See footnote 14
  10. ^ Byron 2011, pp. 98–100.
  11. ^ Byron 2011, p. 119: Mellinkoff, 1942, p. 210; Moberley, 2007, pp. 11–28
  12. ^ Byron 2011, p. 120: (Tg. Ps.-J. Gen 4:15, Pirqe R. El. 21)
  13. ^ a b Byron 2011, p. 120: Gen. Rab. 22:12
  14. ^ Byron 2011, p. 106.
  15. ^ "Genesis – Chapter 4 (Parshah Bereishit) – Tanakh Online – Torah – Bible". Chabad.org. Retrieved 2012-09-21.
  16. ^ Annarita Magri, Caino, lo gnosticismo e i testimonia nel quadro dell’esegesi del II sec. I Perati e i Cainiti, January 2007
  17. ^ "Bereshit A: Chapter 48". Zohar.com. Retrieved 2020-09-01.]
  18. ^ Mellinkoff, Ruth (1981). The Mark of Cain. University of California Press. p. 13. ISBN 9780520906372.
  19. ^ Priest, Josiah Slavery as it Relates to the Negro or African Race (1843)
  20. ^ "Land of the Till Murder". Ebony. April 1956. Archived from the original on 2005-03-11.
  21. ^ a b Miller, Randall M.; Smith, John David (1988). Dictionary of Afro-American Slavery. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. p. 78. ISBN 0-313-23814-6 – via Internet Archive (archive.org).
  22. ^ Kunnerth, Jeff (21 June 1995). "Baptists renounce racist past". Orlando Sentinel. Orlando, FL. Archived from the original on 2 September 2014. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
  23. ^ a b Benjamin Braude, "The Sons of Noah and the Construction of Ethnic and Geographical Identities in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods", William and Mary Quarterly LIV (January 1997): 103–42. See also William McKee Evans, "From the Land of Canaan to the Land of Guinea: The Strange Odyssey of the Sons of Ham", American Historical Review 85 (February 1980): 15–43. JSTOR 1853423.
  24. ^ a b John N. Swift and Gigen Mammoser, "Out of the Realm of Superstition: Chesnutt's 'Dave's Neckliss' and the Curse of Ham", American Literary Realism, vol. 42 no. 1, Fall 2009, 3
  25. ^ Stuart Bingham, Ryan (July 2015). "Curses and Marks: Racial Dispensations and Dispensations of Race in Joseph Smith's Bible Revision and the Book of Abraham". Journal of Mormon History. 41 (3). University of Illinois Press: 27. doi:10.5406/jmormhist.41.3.22. JSTOR 10.5406/jmormhist.41.3.22.
  26. ^ a b c d e f Collier, Fred C. (1987). The Teachings of President Brigham Young Vol. 3 1852–1854. Salt Lake City: Collier Publishing. ISBN 9780934964012 – via Google Books.
  27. ^ Smith, Joseph (1836). Latter Day Saints' Messenger and Advocate/Volume 2/Number 7/Letter to Oliver Cowdery from Joseph Smith, Jr. (Apr. 1836) . p. 290 – via Wikisource.
  28. ^ Reeve, W. Paul (2015). Religion of a Different Color: Race and the Mormon Struggle for Whiteness. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-975407-6 – via Google Books.
  29. ^ Taylor, Quintard (17 May 1999). In Search of the Racial Frontier: African Americans in the American West 1528–1990. New York City: W. W. Norton & Company. p. 73. ISBN 9780393318890 – via Google Books. Brigham Young spoke for many Saints in 1863 when he assessed the Civil War raging in the East: 'One portion of the country wish [sic] to raise their ... black slaves and the other wish [sic] to free them, and apparently to almost worship them.... Who cares? ... Ham will continue to be the servant of servants, as the Lord has decreed, until the curse is removed.'
  30. ^ Harris, Matthew L.; Bringhurst, Newell G. (2015). The Mormon Church and Blacks: A Documentary History. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-252-08121-7 – via Google Books.
  31. ^ Kidd, Colin (2006). The Forging of Races: Race and Scripture in the Protestant Atlantic World, 1600–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521793247 – via Google Books.
  32. ^ Watt, George D. "Brigham Young, 1852 February 5" (5 Feb 1852). Historian's Office reports of speeches, 1845–1885, ID: CR 100 317, p. 2. Salt Lake City: LDS Church History Library.
  33. ^ Wilson 1904
  34. ^ Whiting 2003
  35. ^ "Guide to the Scriptures – Ham".
  36. ^ "Black History Timeline". BlackLDS.org. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  37. ^ Wilford Woodruff, Diary of Wilford Woodruff, January 16, 1852. "[A]ny man having one drop of the seed of [Cain] … in him cannot hold the priesthood and if no other Prophet ever spake it before I will say it now in the name of Jesus Christ".
  38. ^ Bush, Lester E. Jr.; Mauss, Armand L., eds. (1984). Neither White Nor Black: Mormon Scholars Confront the Race Issue in a Universal Church. Salt Lake City: Signature Books. ISBN 0-941214-22-2. Cain, in murdering Abel, had 'deprived his brother of the privilege of pursuing his journey through life, and of extending his kingdom by multiplying upon the earth.' Cain had reportedly hoped thereby to gain an advantage over Abel—the number of one's posterity somehow being important in the overall scheme of things. Brigham Young further explained that those who were to have been Abel's descendants had already been assigned to his lineage, and if they were ever to come "into the world in the regular way, they would have to come through him." In order that Cain's posterity not gain an advantage the Lord denied them the priesthood until such time as "the class of spirits presided over by Abel should have the privilege of coming into the world." Those spirits formerly under Cain's leadership were reportedly aware of the implications of this decision, yet "still looked up to him, and rather than forsake him they were willing to bear his burdens and share the penalty imposed upon him."
  39. ^ "Mormonism's Negro Doctrine: An Historical Overview". Dialogue. University of Illinois Press: 253. 2001.
  40. ^ Sterling M. McMurrin affidavit, March 6, 1979. See David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism by Greg Prince and William Robert Wright, p.[page needed]. Quoted by Genesis Group Archived 2011-07-13 at the Wayback Machine
  41. ^ "Spencer W. Kimball – Significant Events". churchofjesuschrist.org. Archived from the original on 2004-08-28. Retrieved 2012-09-21.
  42. ^ Official Declaration 2 (LDS standard works); see also: Official Declaration 2
  43. ^ Bushman, Richard (2008). Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. pp. 111–112. ISBN 978-0-19-531030-6 – via Google Books.
  44. ^ Broadway, Bill (1998-05-30). "Black Mormons Resist Apology Talk". The Washington Post. Washington D.C.
  45. ^ Ramirez, Margaret (2005-07-26). "Mormon past steeped in racism: Some black members want church to denounce racist doctrines". Chicago Tribune. Chicago, Illinois.
  46. ^ a b Race and the Priesthood, LDS Church

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]