Jump to content

Talk:Nested sampling algorithm: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hami027 (talk | contribs)
Update Physics 416 assignment details
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Task 24: template substitution following a TFD
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPStatistics|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WPStatistics|class=start|importance=low}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Brigham_Young_University/Physics_416_(Winter_2020) | assignments = [[User:Hami027|Hami027]] | start_date = 2020-03-10 | end_date = 2020-04-30 }}


==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-03-10">10 March 2020</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-04-30">30 April 2020</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Brigham_Young_University/Physics_416_(Winter_2020)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Hami027|Hami027]].

{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 05:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
== "Controversy Over Soundness" ==
== "Controversy Over Soundness" ==
I'm removing the comment about controversy surrounding the soundness of this sampling algorithm. If you can't go into details or explain why the method is controversial and possibly not sound, then cite a credible reference. Since the method has been peer-reviewed, published, and used successfully in applications, I think a comment like this requires a credible citation per standard Wiki terms/rules.
I'm removing the comment about controversy surrounding the soundness of this sampling algorithm. If you can't go into details or explain why the method is controversial and possibly not sound, then cite a credible reference. Since the method has been peer-reviewed, published, and used successfully in applications, I think a comment like this requires a credible citation per standard Wiki terms/rules.

Revision as of 05:07, 17 January 2022

WikiProject iconStatistics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 March 2020 and 30 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hami027.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversy Over Soundness"

I'm removing the comment about controversy surrounding the soundness of this sampling algorithm. If you can't go into details or explain why the method is controversial and possibly not sound, then cite a credible reference. Since the method has been peer-reviewed, published, and used successfully in applications, I think a comment like this requires a credible citation per standard Wiki terms/rules.

If anyone knows Jon Skilling's website please update the link 169.232.151.227 (talk) 22:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]