Talk:Programming language implementation: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 11:30, 16 March 2023

A summary of this article appears in Programming language.

Computing: Software C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Abstract machines

The subject of an Abstract machines is incorrectly explained. A high level programming language may be thought of as an abstract machine. There is not a specific formal specification of an abstract machine for every programming language.

A compiler may produce code for an abstract machine. That code may then by run on an inturpiter or translated into real machine code.

The concept is real and important. But needs some work. JIT compilation could be considered. P-code machines. byte-code etc.

An abstract machine could be generalized. Many languages compiling to the same abstract machine. And that abstract machine having translations to to specific hardware and operating systems.

I wrote a compiler-compiler implementing an intermediate abstract machine defining PSEUDO language. The PSEUDO instructions are functions programed to output machine instructions. Steamerandy (talk) 00:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This shouldn't be merged with Compiler or Compiler construction

Reason:

Programming language can be interpreted
Programming language can exist without implementation. YES, not a typo!
... Ushkin N (talk) 14:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 # [[Programming language]] can exist without implementation. YES, not a typo!
 # ... [[User:Ushkin N|Ushkin N]] ([[User talk:Ushkin N|talk]]) 14:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
-== @BABA@BRAND ==
-BRAND
-Aaaaa [[Special:Contributions/27.123.240.250|27.123.240.250]] ([[User talk:27.123.240.250|talk]]) 08:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)