<math>K(\lambda^*(x))</math> and <math>E(\lambda^*(x))</math> (the [[Elliptic integral#Complete elliptic integral of the second kind|complete elliptic integral of the second kind]]) can be expressed in closed form in terms of the [[gamma function]] for any <math>x\in\mathbb{Q}^+</math>, as Selberg and Chowla proved in 1949.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-Epstein's-Zeta-Function-(I).-Chowla-Selberg/87dc02200853b431bfa900e297cd6c2f80a5a4b1|title=On Epstein's Zeta Function (I).|last1=Chowla|first1=S.|last2=Selberg|first2=A.|website=SemanticScholar|page=373}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eudml.org/doc/150803|title=On Epstein's Zeta-Function|last1=Chowla|first1=S.|last2=Selberg|first2=A.|website=EuDML|page=86–110}}</ref>
<math>K(\lambda^*(x))</math> and <math>E(\lambda^*(x))</math> (the [[Elliptic integral#Complete elliptic integral of the second kind|complete elliptic integral of the second kind]]) can be expressed in closed form in terms of the [[gamma function]] for any <math>x\in\mathbb{Q}^+</math>, as Selberg and Chowla proved in 1949.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=On Epstein's Zeta Function (I).|last1=Chowla|first1=S.|last2=Selberg|first2=A.|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=1949 |volume=35 |issue=7 |page=373|doi=10.1073/PNAS.35.7.371 |s2cid=45071481 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eudml.org/doc/150803|title=On Epstein's Zeta-Function|last1=Chowla|first1=S.|last2=Selberg|first2=A.|website=EuDML|pages=86–110}}</ref>
The following expression is valid for all <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>:
The following expression is valid for all <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>:
Revision as of 10:05, 25 October 2023
Modular lambda function in the complex plane.
In mathematics, the modular lambda function λ(τ)[note 1] is a highly symmetric Holomorphic function on the complex upper half-plane. It is invariant under the fractional linear action of the congruence group Γ(2), and generates the function field of the corresponding quotient, i.e., it is a Hauptmodul for the modular curveX(2). Over any point τ, its value can be described as a cross ratio of the branch points of a ramified double cover of the projective line by the elliptic curve, where the map is defined as the quotient by the [−1] involution.
By symmetrizing the lambda function under the canonical action of the symmetric group S3 on X(2), and then normalizing suitably, one obtains a function on the upper half-plane that is invariant under the full modular group , and it is in fact Klein's modular j-invariant.
A plot of x→ λ(ix)
Modular properties
The function is invariant under the group generated by[1]
The modular equation of degree (where is a prime number) is an algebraic equation in and . If and , the modular equations of degrees are, respectively,[8]
The quantity (and hence ) can be thought of as a holomorphic function on the upper half-plane :
Since , the modular equations can be used to give algebraic values of for any prime .[note 2] The algebraic values of are also given by[9][note 3]
The function [10] (where ) gives the value of the elliptic modulus , for which the complete elliptic integral of the first kind and its complementary counterpart are related by following expression:
The values of can be computed as follows:
The functions and are related to each other in this way:
The class invariants are very closely related to the Weber modular functions and . These are the relations between lambda-star and the class invariants:
Other appearances
Little Picard theorem
The lambda function is used in the original proof of the Little Picard theorem, that an entire non-constant function on the complex plane cannot omit more than one value. This theorem was proved by Picard in 1879.[15] Suppose if possible that f is entire and does not take the values 0 and 1. Since λ is holomorphic, it has a local holomorphic inverse ω defined away from 0,1,∞. Consider the function z → ω(f(z)). By the Monodromy theorem this is holomorphic and maps the complex plane C to the upper half plane. From this it is easy to construct a holomorphic function from C to the unit disc, which by Liouville's theorem must be constant.[16]
^Borwein, Jonathan M.; Borwein, Peter B. (1987). Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity (First ed.). Wiley-Interscience. ISBN0-471-83138-7. p. 103–109, 134
^Borwein, Jonathan M.; Borwein, Peter B. (1987). Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity (First ed.). Wiley-Interscience. ISBN0-471-83138-7. p. 152
^Chowla, S.; Selberg, A. (1949). "On Epstein's Zeta Function (I)". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 35 (7): 373. doi:10.1073/PNAS.35.7.371. S2CID45071481.
^ is not a modular function (per the Wikipedia definition), but every modular function is a rational function in . Some authors use a non-equivalent definition of "modular functions".
^For any prime power, we can iterate the modular equation of degree . This process can be used to give algebraic values of for any
Borwein, J. M. and Borwein, P. B. Pi & the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity. New York: Wiley, pp. 139 and 298, 1987.
Conway, J. H. and Norton, S. P. "Monstrous Moonshine." Bull. London Math. Soc. 11, 308-339, 1979.
Selberg, A. and Chowla, S. "On Epstein's Zeta-Function." J. reine angew. Math. 227, 86-110, 1967.