Talk:Flooding algorithm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Maths rating}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field. Tag: |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| |
||
{{WikiProject Mathematics|priority=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== External Links == |
== External Links == |
||
The external links have almost nothing to do with the topic at hand. Perhaps they should be revised? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/178.5.64.106|178.5.64.106]] ([[User talk:178.5.64.106|talk]]) 21:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The external links have almost nothing to do with the topic at hand. Perhaps they should be revised? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/178.5.64.106|178.5.64.106]] ([[User talk:178.5.64.106|talk]]) 21:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Latest revision as of 23:16, 1 February 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External Links
[edit]The external links have almost nothing to do with the topic at hand. Perhaps they should be revised? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.5.64.106 (talk) 21:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Moved
[edit]I moved network-specific content to Flooding (computer networking). Not enough remains here on the general topic to justify an article yet but we'll see what happens. --Kvng (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Please confirm classification
[edit]The WikiProject classification for Flooding algorithm is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 19:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)