Talk:Anytime algorithm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →problem with "References" section: get more specific about the first ** 31 ** entries in the "References" section of the article. |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There is something wrong with the "References" section of the article. The first 31 entries, have just an author's name (or is it a "cite" name?) which does not seem very helpful. Sorry my knowledge of what is wrong, is limited. (However, if you just look at the "References" section of the article, it should be obvious what the problem is.) I just do not know how to fix it. Actually, there may be a "<nowiki>{{tag}}</nowiki>" of some kind, that I could have put in to the article itself, like the one saying "this is a stub, please help expand / improve it". However, if there is such a "<nowiki>{{tag}}</nowiki>", I am not familiar with it. [[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] ([[User talk:Mike Schwartz|talk]]) 00:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
There is something wrong with the "References" section of the article. The first 31 entries, have just an author's name (or is it a "cite" name?) which does not seem very helpful. Sorry my knowledge of what is wrong, is limited. (However, if you just look at the "References" section of the article, it should be obvious what the problem is.) I just do not know how to fix it. Actually, there may be a "<nowiki>{{tag}}</nowiki>" of some kind, that I could have put in to the article itself, like the one saying "this is a stub, please help expand / improve it". However, if there is such a "<nowiki>{{tag}}</nowiki>", I am not familiar with it. [[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] ([[User talk:Mike Schwartz|talk]]) 00:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Fixed. --[[Special:Contributions/63.102.70.70|63.102.70.70]] ([[User talk:63.102.70.70|talk]]) 01:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:43, 20 June 2008
problem with "References" section
There is something wrong with the "References" section of the article. The first 31 entries, have just an author's name (or is it a "cite" name?) which does not seem very helpful. Sorry my knowledge of what is wrong, is limited. (However, if you just look at the "References" section of the article, it should be obvious what the problem is.) I just do not know how to fix it. Actually, there may be a "{{tag}}" of some kind, that I could have put in to the article itself, like the one saying "this is a stub, please help expand / improve it". However, if there is such a "{{tag}}", I am not familiar with it. Mike Schwartz (talk) 00:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Fixed. --63.102.70.70 (talk) 01:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)