Talk:JavaScript library: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:49, 2 October 2010

This article seems useless because the (short) content is mainly made of references to libraries that actually are Ajax frameworks. A redirect to Ajax Framework would be a better choice. Macaldo (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a difference between a JavaScript library and an Ajax framework. Some JavaScript libraries serve as Ajax frameworks, but not all, and many libraries have nothing to do with Ajax. Dilvie (talk) 07:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:42, 1 April 2009 edit Macaldo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 880 edits ←Created page with 'This article seems useless because the (short) content is mainly made of references to libraries that actually are Ajax frameworks. A redirect to Ajax Framework wou…'		Revision as of 07:49, 2 October 2010 edit undo Dilvie (talk \| contribs) 92 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This article seems useless because the (short) content is mainly made of references to libraries that actually are Ajax frameworks. A redirect to Ajax Framework would be a better choice. [[User:Macaldo\|Macaldo]] ([[User talk:Macaldo\|talk]]) 13:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		This article seems useless because the (short) content is mainly made of references to libraries that actually are Ajax frameworks. A redirect to Ajax Framework would be a better choice. [[User:Macaldo\|Macaldo]] ([[User talk:Macaldo\|talk]]) 13:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

			:There is a difference between a JavaScript library and an Ajax framework. Some JavaScript libraries serve as Ajax frameworks, but not all, and many libraries have nothing to do with Ajax. [[User:Dilvie\|Dilvie]] ([[User talk:Dilvie\|talk]]) 07:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)