Jump to content

Canaan: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Stop trying to give pride of place to the Palestinian territories. / Is there no good map of Canaan, really?
Line 28: Line 28:


<!-- Commented out: [[File:Canaanite-and-Wife.jpg|thumb|right|Canaanite man with [[Egyptians|Egyptian]] wife and child.]] -->
<!-- Commented out: [[File:Canaanite-and-Wife.jpg|thumb|right|Canaanite man with [[Egyptians|Egyptian]] wife and child.]] -->
'''Canaan''' ([[Northwest Semitic]] ''{{transl|sem|knaʿn}}''; [[Phoenician language|Phoenician]]: <span dir="rtl" title="Phoenician alphabet" class="script-phoenician" style="direction: rtl; font-size:125%; font-family: 'ALPHABETUM Unicode', 'MPH 2B Damase', Aegean, Code2001, 'Free Sans';" xml:lang="phn-Phnx" lang="phn-Phnx">𐤊𐤍𐤏𐤍</span>; [[biblical Hebrew]]: {{lang|he|כנען}} / ''{{transl|he|knaʿn}}''; [[Masoretic]]: {{lang|he|כְּנָעַן}} / ''{{transl|he|Kənáʿan}}'') was a [[Semitic]]-speaking region in the [[Ancient Near East]], roughly corresponding to the [[Levant]], i.e. modern-day [[Palestine]], [[Israel]],[[Lebanon]], the western part of [[Jordan]] and southwestern [[Syria]]. Canaan was of significant geopolitical importance in the [[Late Bronze Age]] [[Amarna period]] as the area where the [[sphere of interest|spheres of interest]] of the [[Egyptian Empire|Egyptian]], [[Hittite Empire|Hittite]], and [[Assyrian Empire]]s converged. Canaan is historically attested throughout the 4th millennium BC; the later [[Amarna Letters]] use ''{{lang|akk|Kinaḫḫu}}'', while other sources of the [[Egyptian New Kingdom]] mention numerous military campaigns conducted in ''{{lang|egy|Ka-na-na}}''.<ref name="autogenerated1993">Redford, Donald B. (1993) "Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times", (Princeton University Press)</ref> In modern usage, the name is often associated with the [[Hebrew Bible]], where the "Land of Canaan" extends from [[Lebanon]] southward to the "[[Brook of Egypt]]" and eastward to the [[Jordan Valley (Middle East)|Jordan River Valley]]. Long after ethnic Canaanite speakers had been absorbed or emigrated to [[Carthage]], the term ''[[Canaanites]]'' continued to be used in the Bible with other meanings, as at the end of the [[Book of Zechariah]], where it is thought to refer to a class of merchants or to non-monotheistic worshippers in Israel or neighbouring [[Sidon]] and [[Tyre, Lebanon|Tyre]].
'''Canaan''' ([[Northwest Semitic]] ''{{transl|sem|knaʿn}}''; [[Phoenician language|Phoenician]]: <span dir="rtl" title="Phoenician alphabet" class="script-phoenician" style="direction: rtl; font-size:125%; font-family: 'ALPHABETUM Unicode', 'MPH 2B Damase', Aegean, Code2001, 'Free Sans';" xml:lang="phn-Phnx" lang="phn-Phnx">𐤊𐤍𐤏𐤍</span>; [[biblical Hebrew]]: {{lang|he|כנען}} / ''{{transl|he|knaʿn}}''; [[Masoretic]]: {{lang|he|כְּנָעַן}} / ''{{transl|he|Kənáʿan}}'') was a [[Semitic]]-speaking region in the [[Ancient Near East]], roughly corresponding to the [[Levant]], i.e. modern-day [[Lebanon]], [[Israel]] (including the [[Palestinian territories]], the western part of [[Jordan]] and southwestern [[Syria]]. Canaan was of significant geopolitical importance in the [[Late Bronze Age]] [[Amarna period]] as the area where the [[sphere of interest|spheres of interest]] of the [[Egyptian Empire|Egyptian]], [[Hittite Empire|Hittite]], and [[Assyrian Empire]]s converged. Canaan is historically attested throughout the 4th millennium BC; the later [[Amarna Letters]] use ''{{lang|akk|Kinaḫḫu}}'', while other sources of the [[Egyptian New Kingdom]] mention numerous military campaigns conducted in ''{{lang|egy|Ka-na-na}}''.<ref name="autogenerated1993">Redford, Donald B. (1993) "Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times", (Princeton University Press)</ref> In modern usage, the name is often associated with the [[Hebrew Bible]], where the "Land of Canaan" extends from [[Lebanon]] southward to the "[[Brook of Egypt]]" and eastward to the [[Jordan Valley (Middle East)|Jordan River Valley]]. Long after ethnic Canaanite speakers had been absorbed or emigrated to [[Carthage]], the term ''[[Canaanites]]'' continued to be used in the Bible with other meanings, as at the end of the [[Book of Zechariah]], where it is thought to refer to a class of merchants or to non-monotheistic worshippers in Israel or neighbouring [[Sidon]] and [[Tyre, Lebanon|Tyre]].


Much of the modern knowledge about Canaan stems from [[Excavation (archaeology)|archaeological excavation]] in this area. Canaanite culture apparently developed [[In situ conservation (archaeology)|in situ]] from the [[nomadic pastoralism|Circum-Arabian Nomadic Pastoral Complex]], which developed from a fusion of [[Near Eastern]] [[Harifian]] hunter gatherers with [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]] (PPNB) farming cultures, practicing [[animal domestication]], during the [[8.2 kiloyear event|6200&nbsp;BC climatic crisis]].<ref>Zarins, Juris (1992), "Pastoral nomadism in Arabia: ethnoarchaeology and the archaeological record—a case study" in O. Bar-Yosef and A. Khazanov, eds. "Pastoralism in the Levant"</ref> Linguistically, the [[Canaanite languages]] form a group within the [[Northwest Semitic languages]]; its best-known member today is the [[Hebrew language]], being mostly known from Iron Age [[epigraphy]]. Other Canaanite languages are [[Phoenician language|Phoenician]], [[Ammonite language|Ammonite]], [[Moab#Moabite language|Moabite]], and [[Edomite language|Edomite]].
Much of the modern knowledge about Canaan stems from [[Excavation (archaeology)|archaeological excavation]] in this area. Canaanite culture apparently developed [[In situ conservation (archaeology)|in situ]] from the [[nomadic pastoralism|Circum-Arabian Nomadic Pastoral Complex]], which developed from a fusion of [[Near Eastern]] [[Harifian]] hunter gatherers with [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]] (PPNB) farming cultures, practicing [[animal domestication]], during the [[8.2 kiloyear event|6200&nbsp;BC climatic crisis]].<ref>Zarins, Juris (1992), "Pastoral nomadism in Arabia: ethnoarchaeology and the archaeological record—a case study" in O. Bar-Yosef and A. Khazanov, eds. "Pastoralism in the Levant"</ref> Linguistically, the [[Canaanite languages]] form a group within the [[Northwest Semitic languages]]; its best-known member today is the [[Hebrew language]], being mostly known from Iron Age [[epigraphy]]. Other Canaanite languages are [[Phoenician language|Phoenician]], [[Ammonite language|Ammonite]], [[Moab#Moabite language|Moabite]], and [[Edomite language|Edomite]].
Line 39: Line 39:
[[File:Canaanites Book of Gates.png|250px|thumb|right|Canaanites as they were portrayed in the [[Ancient Egyptian]] "[[Book of Gates]]", dated to the 13th century BC.]]
[[File:Canaanites Book of Gates.png|250px|thumb|right|Canaanites as they were portrayed in the [[Ancient Egyptian]] "[[Book of Gates]]", dated to the 13th century BC.]]
<!-- Commented out: [[File:CanaaniteRelief.jpg|thumb|right|Canaanite relief from [[Beth Shemesh]], [[Israel]].]] -->
<!-- Commented out: [[File:CanaaniteRelief.jpg|thumb|right|Canaanite relief from [[Beth Shemesh]], [[Israel]].]] -->
Canaan included what today is Palestine, Israel, Lebanon, northwestern Jordan, and some western areas of Syria.<ref>{{harvnb|Tubb|1998|p=13}}</ref> According to archaeologist Jonathan N. Tubb, "[[Ammon]]ites, [[Moabites]], [[Israelites]] and [[Phoenicians]] undoubtedly achieved their own cultural identities, and yet ethnically they were all Canaanites", "the same people who settled in farming villages in the region in the 8th millennium BC."<ref>{{harvnb|Tubb|1998|pp=13–14}}</ref>
Canaan included what today are Lebanon, Israel and the Palestinian territories, northwestern Jordan, and some western areas of Syria.<ref>{{harvnb|Tubb|1998|p=13}}</ref> According to archaeologist Jonathan N. Tubb, "[[Ammon]]ites, [[Moabites]], [[Israelites]] and [[Phoenicians]] undoubtedly achieved their own cultural identities, and yet ethnically they were all Canaanites", "the same people who settled in farming villages in the region in the 8th millennium BC."<ref>{{harvnb|Tubb|1998|pp=13–14}}</ref>


[[Ebla]] and Amorites at [[Tel Hazor|Hazor]], [[Kadesh]] (Qadesh-on-the-Orontes), and elsewhere in the Syrian area bordered Canaan in the north and northeast. (Ugarit may be included among these Amoritic entities.<ref name="Woodard">{{cite book|author=Woodard|title=The Ancient Languages of Syria-Palestine and Arabia|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vTrT-bZyuPcC&pg=PA5|accessdate=5 May 2013|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-139-46934-0|pages=5–}}</ref>) Lebanon, in northern Canaan, bordered by the [[Litani River|Litani]] river to the watershed of the [[Orontes river|Orontes]] river, was known by the Egyptians as upper [[Retjenu]].<ref>Breasted, J.H. (1906) "Ancient records of Egypt" (University of Illinois Press)</ref> In Egyptian campaign accounts, the term [[Djahi]] was used to refer to the watershed of the Jordan river. Many earlier Egyptian sources also mention numerous military campaigns conducted in ''Ka-na-na'', just inside Asia.<ref name="autogenerated1993"/>
[[Ebla]] and Amorites at [[Tel Hazor|Hazor]], [[Kadesh]] (Qadesh-on-the-Orontes), and elsewhere in the Syrian area bordered Canaan in the north and northeast. (Ugarit may be included among these Amoritic entities.<ref name="Woodard">{{cite book|author=Woodard|title=The Ancient Languages of Syria-Palestine and Arabia|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vTrT-bZyuPcC&pg=PA5|accessdate=5 May 2013|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-139-46934-0|pages=5–}}</ref>) Lebanon, in northern Canaan, bordered by the [[Litani River|Litani]] river to the watershed of the [[Orontes river|Orontes]] river, was known by the Egyptians as upper [[Retjenu]].<ref>Breasted, J.H. (1906) "Ancient records of Egypt" (University of Illinois Press)</ref> In Egyptian campaign accounts, the term [[Djahi]] was used to refer to the watershed of the Jordan river. Many earlier Egyptian sources also mention numerous military campaigns conducted in ''Ka-na-na'', just inside Asia.<ref name="autogenerated1993"/>

Revision as of 01:48, 27 November 2013

Canaan
Canaan
Late Neolithic–Iron Age I
CapitalThe capitals of the various Canaanite states.
Common languagesCanaanite languages
Religion
Canaanite religion
GovernmentMonarchy
Historical eraAncient
• Established
Late Neolithic
• Disestablished
Iron Age I
Succeeded by
Phoenicia
Land of Israel
Aram
Moab
Ammon
Philistia
Tjeker kingdom


Canaan (Northwest Semitic Template:Transl; Phoenician: 𐤊𐤍𐤏𐤍; biblical Hebrew: כנען / Template:Transl; Masoretic: כְּנָעַן / Template:Transl) was a Semitic-speaking region in the Ancient Near East, roughly corresponding to the Levant, i.e. modern-day Lebanon, Israel (including the Palestinian territories, the western part of Jordan and southwestern Syria. Canaan was of significant geopolitical importance in the Late Bronze Age Amarna period as the area where the spheres of interest of the Egyptian, Hittite, and Assyrian Empires converged. Canaan is historically attested throughout the 4th millennium BC; the later Amarna Letters use Kinaḫḫu, while other sources of the Egyptian New Kingdom mention numerous military campaigns conducted in Ka-na-na.[1] In modern usage, the name is often associated with the Hebrew Bible, where the "Land of Canaan" extends from Lebanon southward to the "Brook of Egypt" and eastward to the Jordan River Valley. Long after ethnic Canaanite speakers had been absorbed or emigrated to Carthage, the term Canaanites continued to be used in the Bible with other meanings, as at the end of the Book of Zechariah, where it is thought to refer to a class of merchants or to non-monotheistic worshippers in Israel or neighbouring Sidon and Tyre.

Much of the modern knowledge about Canaan stems from archaeological excavation in this area. Canaanite culture apparently developed in situ from the Circum-Arabian Nomadic Pastoral Complex, which developed from a fusion of Near Eastern Harifian hunter gatherers with Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) farming cultures, practicing animal domestication, during the 6200 BC climatic crisis.[2] Linguistically, the Canaanite languages form a group within the Northwest Semitic languages; its best-known member today is the Hebrew language, being mostly known from Iron Age epigraphy. Other Canaanite languages are Phoenician, Ammonite, Moabite, and Edomite.

The various Canaanite nations of the Bronze and Iron Ages are mentioned in the Bible and Mesopotamian (Assyrian and Babylonian), Hittite and Ancient Egyptian texts. The Late Bronze Age state of Ugarit (at Ras Shamra in Syria) is considered quintessentially Canaanite archaeologically,[3] even though its Ugaritic language does not belong to the Canaanite group proper.

The Canaanites endured in the northern, coastal portion of their domain, under the name of Phoenicians, after the rest of Canaan was carved up by the Israelites, Philistines, Arameans, perhaps the Tjeker, and others.

Nomenclature

Canaanites as they were portrayed in the Ancient Egyptian "Book of Gates", dated to the 13th century BC.

Canaan included what today are Lebanon, Israel and the Palestinian territories, northwestern Jordan, and some western areas of Syria.[4] According to archaeologist Jonathan N. Tubb, "Ammonites, Moabites, Israelites and Phoenicians undoubtedly achieved their own cultural identities, and yet ethnically they were all Canaanites", "the same people who settled in farming villages in the region in the 8th millennium BC."[5]

Ebla and Amorites at Hazor, Kadesh (Qadesh-on-the-Orontes), and elsewhere in the Syrian area bordered Canaan in the north and northeast. (Ugarit may be included among these Amoritic entities.[6]) Lebanon, in northern Canaan, bordered by the Litani river to the watershed of the Orontes river, was known by the Egyptians as upper Retjenu.[7] In Egyptian campaign accounts, the term Djahi was used to refer to the watershed of the Jordan river. Many earlier Egyptian sources also mention numerous military campaigns conducted in Ka-na-na, just inside Asia.[1]

In biblical usage, the name was confined to the country west of the Jordan, the Canaanites being described as dwelling "by the sea, and along by the side of the Jordan" (Numbers 33:51; Joshua 22:9), and was especially identified with Phoenicia (Isaiah 23:11).[8] The Philistines, while an integral part of the Canaanite milieu, do not seem to have been ethnic Canaanites; the Hurrians (who spoke a language isolate), Hittites (Indo-European speakers), as well as the Semitic Arameans, Moabites, and Ammonites, are also considered "distinct" from generic Canaanites/Amorites, in scholarship or in tradition, although in the biblical Table of Nations, "Heth", representing the Hittites, is a son of Canaan. The Hittites spoke an Indo-European language (called Nesili), but their predecessors the Hattians had spoken a little-known language (Hattili), of uncertain affinities.

The biblical narrative makes a point of the renaming of the "Land of Canaan" to the "Land of Israel" as marking the Israelite conquest of the Promised Land.[9][verification needed]

Etymology

The English term Canaan (pronounced /ˈknən/ since c. AD 1500, thanks to the Great Vowel Shift) comes from the Hebrew Template:Hebrew (knʿn), via Greek Χαναάν Khanaan and Latin Canaan. It appears as [KUR ki-na-ah-na] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help) in the Amarna letters (14th century BC), and knʿn is found on coins from Phoenicia in the last half of the 1st millennium. It first occurs in Greek in the writings of Hecataeus as Khna(Χνᾶ).[10] The Bible derives the name from that of an alleged ancestor, Canaan son of Ham. Scholars connect the name Canaan with knʿn, Kana'an, the general Northwest Semitic name for this region.

The etymology is uncertain. One explanation is that it has an original meaning of "lowlands", from a Semitic root knʿ "to be low, humble, depressed", in contrast with Aram, "highlands".[11] An alternative suggestion derives the term from Hurrian Kinahhu, purportedly referring to the colour purple, so that Canaan and Phoenicia would be synonyms ("Land of Purple"), but it is just as common to assume that Kinahhu was simply the Hurrian rendition of the Semitic knʿn.[12][13]

Mesopotamian references

Certain scholars of the Semitic Eblaite material (dated 2350 BC) from the archive of Tell Mardikh see the oldest reference to Canaanites in the ethnic name ga-na-na which provides a third millennium reference to the name Canaan.[14]

Canaan is mentioned in a document from the 18th century BC found in the ruins of Mari, a former Sumerian and at that time Assyrian outpost in Syria, located along the Middle Euphrates. Apparently Canaan at this time existed as a distinct political entity (probably a loose confederation of city-states). A letter from this time complains about certain "thieves and Canaanites (i.e. Kinahhu)" causing trouble in the town of Rahisum.[3]

Tablets found in the Mesopotamian city of Nuzi use the term Kinahnu ("Canaan") as a synonym for red or purple dye, laboriously produced by the Kassite rulers of Babylon from murex shells as early as 1600 BC, and on the Mediterranean coast by the Phoenicians from a byproduct of glassmaking. Purple cloth became a renowned Canaanite export commodity which is mentioned in Exodus. The dyes may have been named after their place of origin. The name 'Phoenicia' is connected with the Greek word for "purple", apparently referring to the same product, but it is difficult to state with certainty whether the Greek word came from the name, or vice versa. The purple cloth of Tyre in Phoenicia was well known far and wide and was associated by the Romans with nobility and royalty.

Anne Killebrew has shown that cities such as Jerusalem were large and important walled settlements in the 'Pre-Israelite' Middle Bronze IIB and the Israelite Iron Age IIC period (ca. 1800–1550 and 720–586 BCE), but that during the intervening Late Bronze (LB) and Iron Age I and IIA/B Ages sites like Jerusalem were small and relatively insignificant and unfortified towns.[15]

References to Canaanites are also found throughout the Amarna letters of Pharaoh Akenaton circa 1350 BC, and a reference to the "land of Canaan" is found on the statue of Idrimi of Alalakh in modern Syria. After a popular uprising against his rule, Idrimi was forced into exile with his mother's relatives to seek refuge in "the land of Canaan", where he prepared for an eventual attack to recover his city. Texts from Ugarit also refer to an individual Canaanite (*kn'ny), suggesting that the Semitic people of Ugarit, contrary to much modern opinion, considered themselves to be non-Canaanite.[16]

Archaeological excavations of a number of sites, later identified as Canaanite, show that prosperity of the region reached its apogee during this Middle Bronze Age period, under leadership of the city of Hazor, at least nominally tributary to Egypt for much of the period. In the north, the cities of Yamkhad and Qatna were hegemons of important confederacies, and it would appear that biblical Hazor was the chief city of another important coalition in the south. In the early Late Bronze Age, Canaanite confederacies were centered on Megiddo and Kadesh, before again being brought into the Egyptian Empire and Hittite Empire. Later still, the region was conquered into the Neo Assyrian Empire.

Greco-Roman historiography

In the 6th century BC, Hecataeus of Miletus affirms that Phoenicia was formerly called χνα, a name that Philo of Byblos subsequently adopted into his mythology as his eponym for the Phoenicians: "Khna who was afterwards called Phoinix". Quoting fragments attributed to Sanchuniathon, he relates that Byblos, Berytus and Tyre were among the first cities ever built, under the rule of the mythical Cronus, and credits the inhabitants with developing fishing, hunting, agriculture, shipbuilding and writing.

The southern highlands of the region were later named Judea after the kingdom of Judah, while the coastal region came to be known as Παλαιστίνη in Greek (Latin Palaestina), from the name of the Philistines. That name was extended to a larger area in the 2nd century, with the establishment of the Roman province of Syria Palaestina.

Saint Augustine also mentions that one of the terms the seafaring Phoenicians called their homeland was "Canaan". This is further confirmed by coins of the city of Laodicea in modern day Syria, that bear the legend, "Of Laodicea, a metropolis in Canaan"; these coins are dated to the reign of Antiochus IV (175–164 BC) and his successors. Augustine also records that the rustic people of Hippo retained the Punic self-designation Chanani.[17]

History

Overview

  • Prior to 3500 BC (prehistory – Stone Age and Chalcolithic): hunter-gatherer societies slowly giving way to farming and herding societies, and early metal-working in the last thousand years;
  • 3500–2000 (Early Bronze): invention of writing;
  • 2000–1550 (Middle Bronze): city-states;
  • 1550–1200 (Late Bronze): Egyptian hegemony;
  • 1200–586 (Iron Age, divided into Iron Age I and II): village societies in Iron I giving way to kingdoms in Iron II.

After the Iron Age the periods are named after the various empires that ruled the region: Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek (Hellenistic) and Roman.[18]

Canaanite civilization was a response to long periods of stable climate interrupted by short periods of climate change. During these periods, Canaanites profited from their intermediary position between the ancient civilizations of the Middle East — Ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia (Sumer, Akkad, Assyria, Babylonia), the Hittites, and Minoan Crete — to become city states of merchant princes along the coast, with small kingdoms specializing in agricultural products in the interior. This polarity, between coastal towns and agrarian hinterland, was illustrated in Canaanite mythology by the struggle between the storm god, variously called Teshub (Hurrian) or Ba'al Hadad (Semitic Amorite/Aramean) and Ya'a, Yaw, Yahu or Yam, god of the sea and rivers. Early Canaanite civilization was characterized by small walled market towns, surrounded by peasant farmers growing a range of local horticultural products, along with commercial growing of olives, grapes for wine, and pistachios, surrounded by extensive grain cropping, predominantly wheat and barley. Harvest in early summer was a season when transhumance nomadism was practiced — shepherds staying with their flocks during the wet season and returning to graze them on the harvested stubble, closer to water supplies in the summer. Evidence of this cycle of agriculture is found in the Gezer calendar and in the biblical cycle of the year.

Periods of rapid climate change generally saw a collapse of this mixed Mediterranean farming system; commercial production was replaced with subsistence agricultural foodstuffs; and transhumance pastoralism became a year-round nomadic pastoral activity, whilst tribal groups wandered in a circular pattern north to the Euphrates, or south to the Egyptian delta with their flocks. Occasionally, tribal chieftains would emerge, raiding enemy settlements and rewarding loyal followers from the spoils or by tariffs levied on merchants. Should the cities band together and retaliate, a neighbouring state intervene or should the chieftain suffer a reversal of fortune, allies would fall away or inter-tribal feuding would return. It has been suggested that the Patriarchal tales of the Bible reflect such social forms.[19] During the periods of the collapse of Akkadian Empire in Mesopotamia and the First Intermediate Period of Egypt, the Hyksos invasions and the end of the Middle Bronze Age in Assyria and Babylonia, and the Late Bronze Age collapse, trade through the Canaanite area would dwindle, as Egypt, Babylonia, and to a lesser degree Assyria, withdrew into their isolation. When the climates stabilized, trade would resume firstly along the coast in the area of the Philistine and Phoenician cities. As markets redeveloped, new trade routes that would avoid the heavy tariffs of the coast would develop from Kadesh Barnea, through Hebron, Lachish, Jerusalem, Bethel, Samaria, Shechem, Shiloh through Galilee to Jezreel, Hazor and Megiddo. Secondary Canaanite cities would develop in this region. Further economic development would see the creation of a third trade route from Eilath, Timna, Edom (Seir), Moab, Ammon and thence to the Aramean states of Damascus and Palmyra. Earlier states (for example the Philistines and Tyrians in the case of Judah and Israel, for the second route, and Judah and Israel for the third route) tried generally unsuccessfully to control the interior trade.[20]

Eventually, the prosperity of this trade would attract more powerful regional neighbours, such as Ancient Egypt, Assyria, the Babylonians, Persians, Ancient Greeks and Romans, who would control the Canaanites politically, levying tribute, taxes and tariffs. Often in such periods, thorough overgrazing would result in a climatic collapse and a repeat of the cycle (e.g. PPNB, Ghassulian, Uruk, and the Bronze Age cycles already mentioned). The fall of later Canaanite civilization occurred with the incorporation of the area into the Greco-Roman world (as Iudaea province), and after Byzantine times, into the Muslim Arab and proto-Muslim Umayyad Caliphate. Western Aramaic, one of the two lingua francas of Canaanite civilization, is still spoken in a number of small Syrian villages, whilst Phoenician Canaanite disappeared as a spoken language in about 100 AD. A separate Akkadian-infused Eastern Aramaic is still spoken by the existing Assyrians of Iraq, Iran, northeast Syria and southeast Turkey.

Prehistory

One of the earliest settlements in the region was at Jericho in Canaan. The earliest settlements were seasonal, but, by the Bronze Age, had developed into large urban centres. By the Early Bronze Age other sites had developed, such as Ebla (where an East Semitic tongue was spoken), which by ca. 2300 BC was incorporated into the Mesopotamia-based Akkadian Empire of Sargon the Great and Naram-Sin of Akkad (biblical Accad). Sumerian references to the Mar.tu ("tent dwellers" – considered to be Amorite) country West of the Euphrates date from even earlier than Sargon, at least to the reign of the Sumerian king, Enshakushanna of Uruk. The archives of Ebla show reference to a number of biblical sites, including Hazor, Jerusalem, and as a number of people have claimed, to Sodom and Gomorrah mentioned in Genesis as well. The collapse of the Akkadian Empire in 2154 BC saw the arrival of peoples using Khirbet Kerak Ware pottery,[21] coming originally from the Zagros Mountains (in modern Iran) east of the Tigris.

Early Bronze Age (3500–2000)

The first cities in the southern Levant arose during this period.[22] These "proto-Canaanites" were in regular contact with the other peoples to their south such as Egypt, and to the north Asia Minor (Hurrians, Hattians, Hittites, Luwians) and Mesopotamia (Sumer, Akkad, Assyria), a trend that continued through the Iron Age.[22] The end of the period is marked by the abandonment of the cities and a return to lifestyles based on farming villages and semi-nomadic herding, although specialised craft production continued and trade routes remained open.[22]

Middle Bronze Age (2000–1550)

Urbanism returned and the region was divided among small city-states, the most important of which seems to have been Hazor.[23] Many aspects of Semitic Canaanite material culture now reflected a Mesopotamian influence, and the entire region became more tightly integrated into a vast international trading network.[23] It was during this period too that Canaanites invaded the eastern Delta of Egypt, where, known as the Hyksos, they became the dominant power.[24] In Egyptian inscriptions, Amar and Amurru (Amorites) are applied strictly to the more northerly mountain region east of Phoenicia, extending to the Orontes. In the Akkadian Empire, as early as Naram-Sin's reign (ca. 2240 BC), Amurru was called one of the "four quarters" surrounding Sumer, along with Subartu/Assyria, Akkad, and Elam. Amorite dynasties also came to dominate in much of Mesopotamia, including in Larsa, Isin and founding the state of Babylon in 1894 BC. Later on, Amurru became the Assyrian/Akkadian term for the interior of south as well as for northerly Canaan. At this time the Canaanite area seemed divided between two confederacies, one centred upon Megiddo in the Jezreel Valley, the second on the more northerly city of Kadesh on the Orontes River. An Amorite chieftain named Sumu-abum founded Babylon as an independent city-state in 1894 BC. One Amorite king of Babylonia, Hammurabi (1792–1750 BC) founded the first Babylonian Empire, which lasted only as long as his lifetime. Upon his death, the Amorites were driven from Assyria, but remained masters of Babylonia until 1595 BC, when they were ejected by the Hittites.

Late Bronze Age (1550–1200)

Map of the Ancient Near East during the Amarna Period, showing the great powers of the day: Egypt (orange), Hatti (blue), the Kassite kingdom of Babylon (black), Middle Assyrian Empire (yellow), and Mitanni (brown). The extent of the Achaean/Mycenaean civilization is shown in purple.

During the 2nd millennium BC, Ancient Egyptian texts use the term Canaan to refer to an Egyptian-ruled colony, whose boundaries generally corroborate the definition of Canaan found in the Hebrew Bible, bounded to the west by the Mediterranean Sea, to the north in the vicinity of Hamath in Syria, to the east by the Jordan Valley, and to the south by a line extended from the Dead Sea to around Gaza. Nevertheless, the Egyptian and Hebrew uses of the term are not identical: the Egyptian texts also identify the coastal city of Qadesh in north west Syria near Turkey as part of the "Land of Canaan", so that the Egyptian usage seems to refer to the entire Levantine coast of the Mediterranean Sea, making it a synonym of another Egyptian term for this coastland, Retenu.

There is uncertainty about whether the name Canaan refers to a specific Semitic ethnic group wherever they live, the homeland of this ethnic group, or a region under the control of this ethnic group, or perhaps any of the three.

At the end of what is referred to as the Middle Kingdom of Egypt, there was a breakdown in centralised power, the assertion of independence by various nomarchs and the assumption of power in the Delta by Pharaohs of the 17th Dynasty. Around 1674 BC, these Canaanites, whom the Egyptians referred to as "rulers of foreign lands" (Egyptian, Template:Transl), hence "Hyksos" (Greek), invaded Egypt, where they would rule for over a century.

Among the migrant Semitic tribes who appear to have settled in the region were the Amorites, who had earlier controlled Babylonia. In the Old Testament, the Amorites are mentioned in the Table of Peoples (Gen. 10:16–18a). Evidently, the Amorites played a significant role in the early history of Canaan. In Gen. 14:7 f., Josh. 10:5 f., Deut. 1:19 f., 27, 44, we find them located in the southern mountain country, while in Num. 21:13, Josh. 9:10, 24:8, 12, etc., we are told of two great Amorite kings residing at Heshbon and Ashteroth, east of the Jordan. However, in other passages such as Gen. 15:16, 48:22, Josh. 24:15, Judg. 1:34, etc., the name Amorite is regarded as synonymous with "Canaanite"—only "Amorite" is never used for the population on the coast.

In the centuries preceding the appearance of the biblical Hebrews, parts of Canaan and southwestern Syria became tributary to the Egyptian Pharaohs, although domination by the Egyptians was sporadic, and not strong enough to prevent frequent local rebellions and inter-city struggles. Other areas such as northern Canaan and northern Syria came to be ruled by the Assyrians during this period.

Under Thutmose III (1479–1426 BC) and Amenhotep II (1427–1400 BC), the regular presence of the strong hand of the Egyptian ruler and his armies kept the Amorites and Canaanites sufficiently loyal. Nevertheless, Thutmose III reported a new and troubling element in the population. Habiru or (in Egyptian) 'Apiru, are reported for the first time. These seem to have been mercenaries, brigands or outlaws, who may have at one time led a settled life, but with bad-luck or due to the force of circumstances, contributed a rootless element of the population, prepared to hire themselves to whichever local mayor, king or princeling prepared to undertake their support.

Although Habiru Template:Transl (a Sumerian ideogram glossed as "brigand" in Akkadian), and sometimes Habiri (an Akkadian word) had been reported in Mesopotamia from the reign of the Sumerian king, Shulgi of Ur III, their appearance in Canaan appears to have been due to the arrival of a new state based in Asia Minor to the north of Assyria based upon Maryannu aristocracy of horse-drawn charioteers, associated with the Indo-Aryan rulers of the Hurrians, known as Mitanni.

The Habiru seem to have been more a social class than any ethnic group. One analysis shows that the majority were, however, Hurrian (a non Semitic group from Asia Minor who spoke a language isolate), though there were a number of Semites and even some Kassite and Luwian adventurers amongst their number. The reign of Amenhotep III, as a result was not quite so tranquil for the Asiatic province, as Habiru/'Apiru contributed to greater political instability. It is believed[by whom?] that turbulent chiefs began to seek their opportunities, though as a rule could not find them without the help of a neighbouring king. The boldest of the disaffected nobles was Aziru, son of Abdi-Ashirta, a prince of Amurru, who even before the death of Amenhotep III, endeavoured to extend his power into the plain of Damascus. Akizzi, governor of Katna (Qatna?) (near Hamath), reported this to the Pharaoh, who seems to have sought to frustrate his attempts. In the next reign, however, both father and son caused infinite trouble to loyal servants of Egypt like Rib-Hadda, governor of Gubla (Gebal), not the least through transferring loyalty from the Egyptian crown to that of the expanding neighbouring Asia Minor based Hittite Empire under Suppiluliuma I.[25]

Egyptian power in Canaan thus suffered a major setback when the Hittites (or Hatti) advanced into Syria in the reign of Amenhotep III, and became even more threatening in that of his successor, displacing the Amorites and prompting a resumption of Semitic] migration. Abd-Ashirta and his son Aziru, at first afraid of the Hittites, afterwards made a treaty with their king, and joining with the Hittites, attacked and conquered the districts remaining loyal to Egypt. In vain did Rib-Hadda send touching appeals for aid to the distant Pharaoh, who was far too engaged in his religious innovations to attend to such messages.

In the Amarna letters (circa 1350 BC), some of which were sent by governors and princes of Canaan to their Egyptian overlord Akhenaten (Amenhotep IV) in the 14th century BC, are found, beside Amar and Amurru (Amorites), the two forms Kinahhi and Kinahni, corresponding to Kena' and Kena'an respectively, and including Syria in its widest extent, as Eduard Meyer has shown. The letters are written in the official and diplomatic Akkadian language of Assyria and Babylonia, though "Canaanitish" words and idioms are also in evidence.

In the Amarna letters, we meet with the Habiri in northern Syria. Etakkama wrote thus to the Pharaoh,

"Behold, Namyawaza has surrendered all the cities of the king, my lord to the Template:Transl in the land of Kadesh and in Ubi. But I will go, and if thy gods and thy sun go before me, I will bring back the cities to the king, my lord, from the Habiri, to show myself subject to him; and I will expel the Template:Transl."

Similarly, Zimrida, king of Sidon (named 'Siduna'), declared, "All my cities which the king has given into my hand, have come into the hand of the Habiri." The king of Jerusalem, Abdi-Heba, reported to the Pharaoh,

"If (Egyptian) troops come this year, lands and princes will remain to the king, my lord; but if troops come not, these lands and princes will not remain to the king, my lord."

Abdi-heba's principal trouble arose from persons called Iilkili and the sons of Labaya, who are said to have entered into a treasonable league with the Habiri. Apparently this restless warrior found his death at the siege of Gina. All these princes, however, maligned each other in their letters to the Pharaoh, and protested their own innocence of traitorous intentions. Namyawaza, for instance, whom Itakkama (see above) accused of disloyalty, wrote thus to the Pharaoh,

"Behold, I and my warriors and my chariots, together with my brethren and my Template:Transl, and my Suti ?9 are at the disposal of the (royal) troops to go whithersoever the king, my lord, commands."[26]

From the mid 14th century BC through to the 11th century BC, much of Canaan (particularly the north, central and eastern regions of Syria and the north western Mediterranean coastal regions) fell to the Middle Assyrian Empire, and both Egyptian and Hittite influence waned as a result. Powerful Assyrian kings forced tribute on Caananite states and cities from north, east and central Syria as far as the Mediterranean.[27] Arik-den-ili (c. 1307-1296 BC), consolidated Assyrian power in the Levant, he defeated and conquered Semitic tribes of the so-called Ahlamu group. He was followed by Adad-nirari I (1295–1275 BC) who continued expansion to the northwest, mainly at the expense of the Hittites and Hurrians, conquering Hittite territories such as Carchemish and beyond. In 1274 BC Shalmaneser I ascended the throne, a powerful warrior king, he annexed territories in Syria and Canaan previously under Egyptian or Hittite influence, and the growing power of Assyria was perhaps the reason why these two states made peace with one another.[28] This trend continued under Tukulti-Ninurta I (1244–1208 BC) and after a hiatus, Tiglath-Pileser I (1115–1077 BC) who conquered the Arameans of northern Syria, and thence he proceeded to conquer Damascus and the Canaanite/Phoenician cities of (Byblos), Sidon, Tyre and finally Arvad.[28]

Bronze Age collapse

The name Canaan occurs in hieroglyphs as Template:Transl on the Merneptah Stele in the 13th century BC

Just after the Amarna period a new problem arose which was to trouble the Egyptian control of southern Canaan (the rest of the region now being under Assyrian control). Pharaoh Horemhab campaigned against Shasu (Egyptian = "wanderers") or living in nomadic pastoralist tribes, who had moved across the Jordan to threaten Egyptian trade through Galilee and Jezreel. Seti I (ca. 1290 BC) is said to have conquered these Shasu, Semitic nomads living just south and east of the Dead Sea, from the fortress of Taru (Shtir?) to "Ka-n-'-na". After the near collapse of the Battle of Kadesh, Rameses II had to campaign vigorously in Canaan to maintain Egyptian power. Egyptian forces penetrated into Moab and Ammon, where a permanent fortress garrison (Called simply "Rameses") was established.

After the collapse of the Levant under the so-called "Peoples of the Sea" Ramesses III (ca. 1194 BC) is said to have built a temple to the god Amen to receive tribute from the southern Levant.[29] This was described as being built in Pa-Canaan, a geographical reference whose meaning is disputed, with suggestions that it may refer to the city of Gaza or to the entire Egyptian-occupied territory in the south west corner of the Near East.[30]

Some believe the "Habiru" signified generally all the nomadic tribes known as "Hebrews", and particularly the early Israelites, who sought to appropriate the fertile region for themselves.[31] However, the term was rarely used to describe the Shasu. Whether the term may also include other related Semitic peoples such as the Moabites, Ammonites and Edomites is uncertain. It may not be an ethnonym at all; see the article Habiru for details.

Iron Age

Map of the southern Levant,[original research?] c.830s BC.
  Kingdom of Judah
  Kingdom of Israel
  Philistine city-states
  Phoenician states
  Kingdom of Ammon
  Kingdom of Edom
  Kingdom of Aram-Damascus
  Aramean tribes
  Arubu tribes
  Nabatu tribes
  Assyrian Empire
  Kingdom of Moab

By the Early Iron Age, the southern Levant came to be dominated by the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, besides the Philistine city-states on the Mediterranean coast, and the kingdoms of Moab, Ammon and Aram-Damascus east of the Jordan River, and Edom to the south. The northern Levant was divided into various petty kingdoms, the so-called Syro-Hittite states and the Phoenician city-states.

The entire region (including all Phoenician/Canaanite and Aramean states, together with Israel, Philistia and Samarra) was conquered by the Neo-Assyrian Empire during the 10th and 9th centuries BC, and would remain so for three hundred years until the end of the 7th century BC. Assyrian emperor-kings such as Ashurnasirpal, Adad-nirari II, Sargon II, Tiglath-Pileser III, Esarhaddon, Sennacherib and Ashurbanipal came to dominate Canaanite affairs. The Egyptians, then under a Nubian Dynasty, made a failed attempt to regain a foothold in the region, but were vanquished by the Assyrians, leading to an Assyrian invasion and conquest of Egypt and the destruction of the Kushite Empire. The Kingdom of Judah was forced to pay tribute to Assyria. Between 616 and 605 BC the Assyrian Empire collapsed due to a series of bitter internal civil wars, followed by an attack by an alliance of Babylonians, Medes and Persians and the Scythians. The Babylonians inherited the western part of the empire of their Assyrian brethren, including all the lands in Canaan and Syria, together with Israel and Judah. They successfully defeated the Egyptians, who had belatedly attempted to aid their former masters, the Assyrians, and then remained in the region in an attempt to regain a foothold in the Near East. The Babylonian Empire itself collapsed in 539 BC, and Canaan fell to the Persians and became a part of the Achaemenid Empire. It remained so until in 332 BC it was conquered by the Greeks under Alexander the Great, later to fall to Rome in the late 2nd century BC, and then Byzantium, until the Arab Islamic invasion and conquest of the 7th century AD.[27]

Canaan in the Hebrew Bible

Map of Canaan, with the border defined by Numbers 34:1–12 shown in red.

Canaan and the Canaanites are mentioned some 160 times in the Hebrew Bible, mostly in the Pentateuch and the books of Joshua and Judges.[32] Canaan first appears as one of Noah's grandsons, cursed with perpetual slavery because his father Ham had "looked upon" the drunk and naked Noah; God later promises Canaan's land to Abraham and eventually delivers it to the Israelites.[32] The biblical history has become increasingly problematic as the archaeological and textual evidence supports the idea that the early Israelites were in fact themselves Canaanites.[32]

The Hebrew Bible lists borders for the land of Canaan. Numbers 34:2 includes the phrase "the land of Canaan as defined by its borders." The borders are then delineated in Numbers 34:3–12. The term "Canaanites" in biblical Hebrew is applied especially to the inhabitants of the lower regions, along the sea coast and on the shores of Jordan, as opposed to the inhabitants of the mountainous regions. By the time of the Second Temple, "Canaanite" in Hebrew had come to be not an ethnic designation, so much as a general synonym for "merchant", as it is interpreted in, for example, Job 40:30, or Proverbs 31:24.[33]

John N. Oswalt notes that "Canaan consists of the land west of the Jordan and is distinguished from the area east of the Jordan." Oswalt then goes on to say that in Scripture Canaan "takes on a theological character" as "the land which is God's gift" and "the place of abundance".[34]

The Hebrew Bible describes the Israelite conquest of Canaan in the "Former Prophets" (Nevi'im Rishonim [נביאים ראשונים] ), viz. the books of Joshua, Judges, 1st & 2nd Samuel, 1st & 2nd Kings. These five books of the Old Testament canon give the narrative of the Israelites after the death of Moses and Joshua leading them into Canaan.[35] In 586 BC, the Israelites in turn lost the land to the Babylonians. These narratives of the Former Prophets are also "part of a larger work, called the Deuteronomistic History".[36]

Biblical Canaanites

The part of the book of Genesis in the Hebrew Bible often called the Table of Nations describes the Canaanites as being descended from an ancestor called Canaan, the son of Ham and grandson of Noah (Template:Lang-he, Knaan), saying (10:15–19 Genesis 10:15–19):

Canaan is the father of Sidon, his firstborn; and of the Hittites, Jebusites, Amorites, Girgashites, Hivites, Arkites, Sinites, Arvadites, Zemarites, and Hamathites. Later the Canaanite clans scattered, and the borders of Canaan reached [across the Mediterranean coast] from Sidon toward Gerar as far as Gaza, and then [inland around the Jordan Valley] toward Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboiim, as far as Lasha.

The Sidon whom the Table identifies as the firstborn son of Canaan has the same name as that of the coastal city of Sidon, in Lebanon. This city dominated the Phoenician coast, and may have enjoyed hegemony over a number of ethnic groups, who are said to belong to the "Land of Canaan".

Similarly, Canaanite populations are said to have inhabited:

The Canaanites (Hebrew: כנענים, Modern: Kna'anim, Tiberian: Kənaʻănîm) are said to have been one of seven regional ethnic divisions or "nations" driven out by the Israelites following The Exodus. Specifically, the other nations include the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites (7:1 Deuteronomy 7:1).

According to the Book of Jubilees, the Israelite conquest of Canaan, and the curse, are attributed to Canaan's steadfast refusal to join his elder brothers in Ham's allotment beyond the Nile, and instead "squatting" on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean, within the inheritance delineated for Shem.

One of the 613 mitzvot (precisely n. 596) prescribes that no inhabitants of the cities of six Canaanite nations, the same as mentioned in 7:1, minus the Girgashites, were to be left alive.

While the Hebrew Bible contrasts the Canaanites ethnically from the Ancient Israelites, modern scholars Jonathan Tubb and Mark Smith have theorized the kingdoms of Israel and Judah to be a subset of Canaanite culture, based on their archaeological and linguistic interpretations,[16][37] an interpretation that has been contested by other archaeologists and historians.[citation needed]

List of Canaanite rulers

Names of Canaanite kings or other figures mentioned in historiography or known through archaeology

Archaeological sites

Tel Kabri contains the remains of a Canaanite city from the Middle Bronze Age (2000–1550 B.C.). The city, the most important of the cities in the Western Galilee during that period, had a palace at its center. Tel Kabri is the only Canaanite city that can be excavated in its entirety because after the city was abandoned, no other city was built over its remains. It is notable because the predominant extra-Canaanite cultural influence is Minoan; Minoan-style frescoes decorate the palace.[38]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b Redford, Donald B. (1993) "Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times", (Princeton University Press)
  2. ^ Zarins, Juris (1992), "Pastoral nomadism in Arabia: ethnoarchaeology and the archaeological record—a case study" in O. Bar-Yosef and A. Khazanov, eds. "Pastoralism in the Levant"
  3. ^ a b Tubb, Jonathan N. (1998), "Canaanites" (British Museum People of the Past)
  4. ^ Tubb 1998, p. 13
  5. ^ Tubb 1998, pp. 13–14
  6. ^ Woodard. The Ancient Languages of Syria-Palestine and Arabia. Cambridge University Press. pp. 5–. ISBN 978-1-139-46934-0. Retrieved 5 May 2013.
  7. ^ Breasted, J.H. (1906) "Ancient records of Egypt" (University of Illinois Press)
  8. ^ The Septuagint translates "Canaanites" by "Phoenicians", and "Canaan" by the "land of the Phoenicians" (Exodus 16:35; Joshua 5:12). "Canaan" article in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia online
  9. ^ The Land of Israel: National Home Or Land of Destiny, By Eliezer Schweid, Translated by Deborah Greniman, Published 1985 Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press, ISBN 0-8386-3234-3
  10. ^ David Asheri, Alan Lloyd, Aldo Corcella, A Commentary on Herodotus, Books 1-4, Oxford University Press, 2007 p.75.
  11. ^ Bible Places: The Topography of the Holy Land By Henry Baker Tristram
  12. ^ Gesenius, Hebrew Lexicon
  13. ^ Lemche 1991, pp. 24–32
  14. ^ Tubb, Johnathan N. (1998) "Canaanites" (British Museum People of the Past) p.15
  15. ^ Killebrew Ann E. "Biblical Jerusalem: An Archaeological Assessment" in Andrew G. Vaughn and Ann E. Killebrew, eds., "Jerusalem in Bible and Archaeology: The First Temple Period" (SBL Symposium Series 18; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003)
  16. ^ a b Tubb, Johnathan N. (1998) "Canaanites" (British Museum People of the Past) p.16
  17. ^ Expos. Ep. ad Romanos, cited by Gesenius, Hebrew Lexicon[1]
  18. ^ Noll 2001, p. 26
  19. ^ Seters John van, (1987), Abraham in Myth and Tradition (Yale University Press)
  20. ^ Thompson, Thomas L. (2000), Early History of the Israelite People: From the Written & Archaeological Sources (Brill Academic)
  21. ^ See
  22. ^ a b c Golden 2009, p. 5
  23. ^ a b Golden 2009, pp. 5–6
  24. ^ Golden 2009, pp. 6–7
  25. ^ F Leo Oppenheim – Ancient Mesopotamia
  26. ^ El Amarna letter, EA 189.
  27. ^ a b Georges Roux – Ancient Iraq
  28. ^ a b George Roux – Ancient Iraq
  29. ^ Higginbotham, Carolyn (2000). Egyptianization and Elite Emulation in Ramesside Palestine: Governance and Accommodation on the Imperial Periphery. Brill Academic Pub. p. 57. ISBN 978-90-04-11768-6.
  30. ^ Hasel, Michael (Sept. 2010). "Pa-Canaan in the Egyptian New Kingdom: Canaan or Gaza?". University of Arizona Institutional Repository logo Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections. 1 (1). Retrieved 12 September 2011. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  31. ^ Wolfe, Robert. "From Habiru to Hebrews: The Roots of the Jewish Tradition". Retrieved 16/21/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  32. ^ a b c Killebrew 2005, p. 96
  33. ^ Gesenius, Hebrew Dictionary[2]
  34. ^ John N. Oswalt, "Template:Hebrew," in R. Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer and Bruce K. Waltke (eds.), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (Chicago: Moody, 1980) 445–446.
  35. ^ The Making of the Old Testament Canon. by Lou H. Silberman, The Interpreter’s One-Volume Commentary on the Bible. Abingdon Press – Nashville 1971–1991, p1209
  36. ^ by Michael Coogan A brief Introduction to the Old Testament, Oxford University Press New York, 2009, p4
  37. ^ Mark Smith in The Early History of God: Yahweh and Other Deities of Ancient Israel states,

    "Despite the long regnant model that the Canaanites and Israelites were people of fundamentally different culture, archaeological data now casts doubt on this view. The material culture of the region exhibits numerous common points between Israelites and Canaanites in the Iron I period (ca. 1200–1000 BC). The record would suggest that the Israelite culture largely overlapped with and derived from Canaanite culture... In short, Israelite culture was largely Canaanite in nature. Given the information available, one cannot maintain a radical cultural separation between Canaanites and Israelites for the Iron I period." (pp. 6–7).Smith, Mark (2002) The Early History of God: Yahweh and Other Deities of Ancient Israel, (Eerdman's)

  38. ^ Remains Of Minoan-Style Painting Discovered During Excavations Of Canaanite Palace, ScienceDaily (Dec. 7, 2009) [3]

Bibliography