Jump to content

Gale–Church alignment algorithm: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m References: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes - Replaced endash with hyphen in sortkey per WP:MCSTJR using AWB (9100)
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes + other fixes, removed orphan tag using AWB (10065)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Orphan|date=February 2009}}
In [[computational linguistics]], the '''Gale–Church algorithm''' is a method for aligning corresponding sentences in a [[parallel corpus]]. It works on the principle that equivalent sentences should roughly correspond in length—that is, longer sentences in one language should correspond to longer sentences in the other language. The algorithm was described in a [http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/J/J93/J93-1004.pdf 1993 paper] by William A. Gale and Kenneth W. Church of [[Bell Labs|AT&T Bell Laboratories]].
In [[computational linguistics]], the '''Gale–Church algorithm''' is a method for aligning corresponding sentences in a [[parallel corpus]]. It works on the principle that equivalent sentences should roughly correspond in length—that is, longer sentences in one language should correspond to longer sentences in the other language. The algorithm was described in a [http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/J/J93/J93-1004.pdf 1993 paper] by William A. Gale and Kenneth W. Church of [[Bell Labs|AT&T Bell Laboratories]].



Revision as of 07:36, 29 March 2014

In computational linguistics, the Gale–Church algorithm is a method for aligning corresponding sentences in a parallel corpus. It works on the principle that equivalent sentences should roughly correspond in length—that is, longer sentences in one language should correspond to longer sentences in the other language. The algorithm was described in a 1993 paper by William A. Gale and Kenneth W. Church of AT&T Bell Laboratories.

References

  • Gale, William A.; Church, Kenneth W. (1993), "A Program for Aligning Sentences in Bilingual Corpora" (PDF), Computational Linguistics, 19 (1): 75–102