User talk:Addshore: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:59, 16 September 2015

			Email Me!
Homepage	Talk	Contributions	Email Me

Click me to start a new message

Archives

2007-2010: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
2010-2020: 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
2020+: 20

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 6 sections are present.

Nomination of Elliptio congaraea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliptio congaraea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliptio congaraea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakesyl (talk • contribs) 01:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

arz interwikis

Hello Addshore, I've put interwikis to arz templates and categories (example), could you please run your bot to migrate interwikis of arz Wikipedia to Wikidata? or what should I do exactly?--M777 ^✉ 17:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! My bot is no longer running, but I am sure another bot will spot them soon enough and move them to Wikidata! :) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 17:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Implementation of Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements

Following a community discussion ending August 2015, consensus was reached to remove the bureaucrat permissions of users who have not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years.

“

Bureaucrats are expected to exercise the duties granted by their role while remaining cognizant of relevant community standards concerning their tasks. In addition to the "Inactive bureaucrat accounts" requirements, if a bureaucrat does not participate in bureaucrat activity^[1] for over three years, their bureaucrat permissions may be removed. The user must be notified on their talk page and by email one month before the removal, and again and a few days prior to the removal. If the user does not return to bureaucrat activity, another bureaucrat may request the removal of permissions at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Permissions removed for not meeting bureaucrat activity requirements may be re-obtained through a new request for bureaucratship.

^ Bureaucrat activity is widely construed and includes acting or commenting as a bureaucrat at any venue including WP:BN/RFA/RFB/RFBAG/BRFA and responding to requests in their capacity as a global renamer or subscriber to the bureaucrats' mailing list or signalling that they remain actively engaged and available for bureacrat tasks.

”

To assist with the implementation of this requirement, please see Wikipedia:Bureaucrat activity. Modeled after Wikipedia:Inactive administrators and similar to that process, the log page will be created on 1 September 2015. Bureaucrats who have not met the activity requirements as of that date will be notified by email (where possible) and on their talk page to advise of the pending removal.

If the notified user does not return to bureaucrat activity and the permissions are removed, they will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFB. Removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon the affected user in any way.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. –xeno^talk

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure why I got a message deleting me...

Good Day, I just had this message pop up: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.3.142.177&redirect=no

It says that I was engaging in vandalism regarding something called Bangkok Dangerous? I'm sorry but I have no idea what that is. I did apply to become a user a long time ago but haven't used it in a while. I hope I wasn't hijacked! Please do let me know what I can do to resolve this. Thanks, Debra Krol [my real actual name] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.142.177 (talk) 00:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal ^talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wsz z xsll

wjwxzsws s as oI xp we j  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.243.230.147 (talk) 21:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see! ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 07:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Bureaucrat activity is widely construed and includes acting or commenting as a bureaucrat at any venue including WP:BN/RFA/RFB/RFBAG/BRFA and responding to requests in their capacity as a global renamer or subscriber to the bureaucrats' mailing list or signalling that they remain actively engaged and available for bureacrat tasks.

[1]

Revision as of 02:48, 16 September 2015 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,399,088 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Addshore/Archive 18) (bot ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:59, 16 September 2015 edit undo Addshore (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 55,384 edits →wsz z xsll Next edit →
Line 58:		Line 58:

	wjwxzsws s as oI xp we j <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.243.230.147\|50.243.230.147]] ([[User talk:50.243.230.147\|talk]]) 21:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		wjwxzsws s as oI xp we j <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.243.230.147\|50.243.230.147]] ([[User talk:50.243.230.147\|talk]]) 21:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			:I see! '''[[User:Addshore\|<span style="color:black">·addshore·</span>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Addshore\|<span style="color:black;">talk to me!</span>]]</sup> 07:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)