User talk:MBisanz: Difference between revisions
→The Signpost: 11 November 2015: new section |
|||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
Is it possible to have this opportunity, or must I start the page all over again? I am new at this. |
Is it possible to have this opportunity, or must I start the page all over again? I am new at this. |
||
Christine |
Christine |
||
:You can re-submit the content with adjustments to [[WP:AFC]]. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 21:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== ''The Signpost'': 04 November 2015 == |
== ''The Signpost'': 04 November 2015 == |
Revision as of 21:20, 15 November 2015
Hi, This is just my talk page, feel free to leave any advice on my edits or ask for help on anything. If you feel I've abused my administrative or BAG powers, please see User:MBisanz/Recall for further instructions to request their removal.
This is MBisanz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 5 days ![]() |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Canadian Collaborative Study of Hip Fractures
Hello. You recently closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Collaborative Study of Hip Fractures as merge to Hip fracture. I have consulted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine, where the consensus appears to be that there's nothing in the article worth merging. What would you suggest happens next? Cordless Larry (talk) 18:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Just redirect the article. If there is nothing to merge, then there's nothing to merge. MBisanz talk 21:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. That was my initial instinct, but there seemed to be some support in the AfD discussion for deleting any redirect that resulted from the merge. I don't see any harm in a redirect myself, though, so I will do as you suggest. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help
- News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles
- In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA
- Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement
- Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth
- Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages
- Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Community letter: Five million articles
Errr...
Hello, looks like you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Marino (online newspaper) as delete and deleted a good article Pichilemu?? Heh. No worries. Will you please undo that? Thanks—UY Scuti Talk 13:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Done --SB_Johnny | talk✌ 14:25, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- You should also restore the wrongfully deleted redirects listed here [1] --191.112.79.216 (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have restored the enwiki link on Wikidata for you. --AmaryllisGardener talk 19:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry about that! I have no idea how that happened. MBisanz talk 05:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- El Marino (online newspaper) is back as a redirect, the discussion closed as delete and you did delete it, but now it's back? Cheers Vrac (talk) 01:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks MBisanz talk 17:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- El Marino (online newspaper) is back as a redirect, the discussion closed as delete and you did delete it, but now it's back? Cheers Vrac (talk) 01:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Process of deletion review
Hi MBisanz,
I would like to suggest new sources for a page that was written about me and was deleted by you a couple weeks ago. It was deleted because most people in the discussion did not seem to find much information except for "standard" modeling links. However, I have collected at least 30 reputable sources which specifically mention work that I have done with famous photographers, magazine covers and designers, and I believe that if I have the chance to edit the page, and include these sources as reference, it will pass the criteria for a Wiki page, as per my understanding. I am new and not 100% sure of the procedures. The deletion discussion is: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vanessa_Perron_(2nd_nomination)
Could you please advise me on the recommended next step for me? Would it be recreating the page, and submitting it for review? Or is there another process I need to follow.
Sincerely,
Vanessa Perron Vperron (talk) 02:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- I recommend you submit it for review at WP:AFC. MBisanz talk 05:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Another Process of deletion review
Hi MBisanz, It looks like you have deleted a new page that I created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Randy_Lee_Cutler I have read your reasons, and would like the opportunity to adjust it/add to it. Is it possible to have this opportunity, or must I start the page all over again? I am new at this. Christine
- You can re-submit the content with adjustments to WP:AFC. MBisanz talk 21:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 November 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone
- In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?
- Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad
- Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 11 November 2015
- Arbitration report: Elections, redirections, and a resignation from the Committee
- Discussion report: Compromise of two administrator accounts prompts security review
- Featured content: Texas, film, and cycling
- In the media: Sanger on Wikipedia; Silver on Vox; lawyers on monkeys
- Traffic report: Doodles of popularity
- Gallery: Paris