Talk:Java ConcurrentMap: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Requested move 23 May 2016: Closing move discussion; result was not moved |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Requested move 23 May 2016 == |
== Requested move 23 May 2016 == |
||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
{{requested move/dated|Java collections framework/ConcurrentMap}} |
|||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''not moved'''. Subpages in article space are not going to happen. [[User:SSTflyer|<span style="color:Black">SST</span>]][[User talk:SSTflyer|<span style="color:DarkSlateGray">flyer</span>]] 10:21, 31 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
[[:Java ConcurrentMap]] → {{no redirect|Java collections framework/ConcurrentMap}} – I'm not sure if sub-page syntax correct. [[User:Ushkin N|Ushkin N]] ([[User talk:Ushkin N|talk]]) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC) [[User:Ushkin N|Ushkin N]] ([[User talk:Ushkin N|talk]]) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC) |
[[:Java ConcurrentMap]] → {{no redirect|Java collections framework/ConcurrentMap}} – I'm not sure if sub-page syntax correct. [[User:Ushkin N|Ushkin N]] ([[User talk:Ushkin N|talk]]) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC) [[User:Ushkin N|Ushkin N]] ([[User talk:Ushkin N|talk]]) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 15: | ||
:::: {{ping|Anarchyte}}, it seems no. |
:::: {{ping|Anarchyte}}, it seems no. |
||
:::: Well some wikis (outside Wikipedia) use sub-pages, to show a link with [[Java collections framework]]. Looks like this approach was never used in main namespace of the English Wikipedia. [[User:Ushkin N|Ushkin N]] ([[User talk:Ushkin N|talk]]) 09:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC) |
:::: Well some wikis (outside Wikipedia) use sub-pages, to show a link with [[Java collections framework]]. Looks like this approach was never used in main namespace of the English Wikipedia. [[User:Ushkin N|Ushkin N]] ([[User talk:Ushkin N|talk]]) 09:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
|||
Revision as of 10:21, 31 May 2016
Requested move 23 May 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Subpages in article space are not going to happen. SSTflyer 10:21, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Java ConcurrentMap → Java collections framework/ConcurrentMap – I'm not sure if sub-page syntax correct. Ushkin N (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Ushkin N (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Subpages should not be used to hold full articles. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well idea was to use "Java collections framewor" in the title, not to use sub-pages. Ushkin N (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Ushkin N: Where did you mean to move it then? I see no reason to move this, though. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte:, it seems no.
- Well some wikis (outside Wikipedia) use sub-pages, to show a link with Java collections framework. Looks like this approach was never used in main namespace of the English Wikipedia. Ushkin N (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Ushkin N: Where did you mean to move it then? I see no reason to move this, though. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well idea was to use "Java collections framewor" in the title, not to use sub-pages. Ushkin N (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.