Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cascade correlation algorithm: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:
*'''Keep''' ''"no citable info, just a .pdf file"'' So since when have PDFs not been citable? Seems to warrant an article IMO [[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MichaelBillington|contribs]]) 11:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' ''"no citable info, just a .pdf file"'' So since when have PDFs not been citable? Seems to warrant an article IMO [[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MichaelBillington|contribs]]) 11:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' seems to have a reasonable number of citations according to CiteSeer. [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/3769.html] [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 11:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' seems to have a reasonable number of citations according to CiteSeer. [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/3769.html] [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 11:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Referenced, encyclopaedic. Notability is a terrible criterion in Math, Science and the like [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 13:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:22, 28 August 2006

Not notable, only 472 google hits, no citable info, just a .pdf file, no evidence of notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmaguir1 (talkcontribs) 2006-08-28 02:30:30