Talk:Course-of-values recursion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Rating article for WikiProject Mathematics. Quality: Start / Priority: Low / Field: foundations (script assisted) |
→Ackermann's function?: new section |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Ackermann's function? == |
|||
Is it worth adding an explanation why this can't be done with [[Ackermann's function]]?[[User:Dan Gluck|Dan Gluck]] ([[User talk:Dan Gluck|talk]]) 21:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:30, 17 June 2016
 | Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Merge?
Is there opposition to merging this into Primitive recursive function? CMummert 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind; I expanded it in place. CMummert · talk 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Ackermann's function?
Is it worth adding an explanation why this can't be done with Ackermann's function?Dan Gluck (talk) 21:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)