Talk:Adaptive-additive algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:25, 30 July 2016

I am a bit confused about the content. As far as I understand this, the adaptive additive algorithm described in the papers by Axel Röbel is not at all related besides that the name of the algorithm is by coincidence the same. Any other views on that? Notably there is not error conversion. I think a much more appropriate link exists to the Griffin and Lim algorithm, that indeed uses IFFT FFT iterations to reconstruct the phase of an STFT.Raebolex (talk) 10:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see your username is an anagram of Alex Robel, so I expect you would know. The editor who connected you to this in 2007 did little else and disappeared. I agree it should be fixed, but I don't know the term or how it is used; I haven't heard it relative to Griffin & Lim. Anyone? Dicklyon (talk) 05:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 10:45, 27 November 2013 edit Raebolex (talk \| contribs) 9 edits ←Created page with 'I am a bit confused about the content. As far as I understand this, the adaptive additive algorithm described in the papers by Axel Röbel is not at all related ...'		Revision as of 05:25, 30 July 2016 edit undo Dicklyon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 485,315 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I am a bit confused about the content. As far as I understand this, the adaptive additive algorithm described in the papers by Axel Röbel is not at all related besides that the name of the algorithm is by coincidence the same. Any other views on that? Notably there is not error conversion. I think a much more appropriate link exists to the Griffin and Lim algorithm, that indeed uses IFFT FFT iterations to reconstruct the phase of an STFT.[[User:Raebolex\|Raebolex]] ([[User talk:Raebolex\|talk]]) 10:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)		I am a bit confused about the content. As far as I understand this, the adaptive additive algorithm described in the papers by Axel Röbel is not at all related besides that the name of the algorithm is by coincidence the same. Any other views on that? Notably there is not error conversion. I think a much more appropriate link exists to the Griffin and Lim algorithm, that indeed uses IFFT FFT iterations to reconstruct the phase of an STFT.[[User:Raebolex\|Raebolex]] ([[User talk:Raebolex\|talk]]) 10:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

			:I see your username is an anagram of Alex Robel, so I expect you would know. The editor who connected you to this in 2007 did little else and disappeared. I agree it should be fixed, but I don't know the term or how it is used; I haven't heard it relative to Griffin & Lim. Anyone? [[User:Dicklyon\|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon\|talk]]) 05:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)