Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:33, 7 August 2016

Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another "nature-inspired" metaheuristic. This is a field of computer science where citation circles seem to be the norm rather than the exception, so the few references in the article do not convince me. Without a well-respected overview article or book mentioning this, this doesn't pass WP:GNG. —Ruud 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for each of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Water Drops algorithm, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glowworm swarm optimization, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm. For each of these there are multiple publications in academic journals over a period of years. That seems to establish WP:GNG. If these are to be deleted I would want a counterargument to the default assumption that the articles cited are not reliable. Peer reviewed academic research which addresses a topic by name is usually considered to meet WP:RS and establish WP:GNG. Why demand a higher standard in this case? Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/merge This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics per WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-<!--Template:Afd top
-Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
-The result was '''keep'''. I'm not against a merge but that should be discussed on the talk page. <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD|(non-admin closure)]]</small> '''[[User:Yellow Dingo|<b style="color:#FFCC33">Yellow</b> <b style="color:brown">Dingo]]'''&#160;[[User talk:Yellow Dingo|<b style="color:BLUE">(talk)</b>]] 07:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 ===[[Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]===
+{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
 :{{la|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 30#{{anchorencode:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuttlefish_Optimization_Algorithm Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 21: / Line 14: @@
 <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 03:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
 *'''Keep/merge''' This one seems weaker than the water drops and glow worm cases but there's something to it and so the worst case is that we merge up into a page like [[List of metaphor-inspired metaheuristics]] per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
-{{clear}}
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>