User talk:SA 13 Bro: Difference between revisions

Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, SA 13 Bro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Introduction to Wikipedia | Tutorial
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Wikipedia:Questions, stop by and/or ask a question at the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Ping me with {{u|Jim1138}} and sign "~~~~" or message me on my talk page. 19:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
  
  
  
  

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

3 barnstars for you!

Moved to User:SA 13 Bro/WikiLove.

Wow! Thanks you for your 3 barnstars at my talk page, my buddy friend man! SA 13 Bro (talk) 11:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Nobody Knows (2004 film)

ok fine i wont write fuck anymore

58.182.235.9 (talk) 17:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

@58.182.235.9: Where is your source for this edit? SA 13 Bro (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

澄清你的宗教信仰

你好，我看到你在User:空间的拓荒者回复了我的评论。在你的用户页面上，你说你是佛教徒。你只是文化佛教徒，还是练习世俗佛教吗？— AWESOME meeos ！ * ([ˈjæb.ə ət məɪ])) 23:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I seem your replies to my comments at User:空间的拓荒者. On your user page, you say you are a Buddhist. Are you just a cultural Buddhist, or practice secular Buddhism? — AWESOME meeos ！ * ([ˈjæb.ə ət məɪ])) 23:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

@Awesomemeeos:

对, 我只是文化上的佛教, 但主张反神论和无宗教信仰.

Yes, I'm only a cultural of Buddhism, but advocating Antitheism and Irreligious.

SA 13 Bro (talk) 00:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Chinese Style Dating Show

Hi, I'm SamHolt6. SA 13 Bro, thanks for creating Chinese Style Dating Show!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. needs footnotes, but passes review

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SamHolt6 (talk) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your reviewing, I created the article page because there was some quality notable on that show event in China and certain part in SE Asia. Regrading about the footnotes sources issues, this may let those advanced English editors from China or SE Asia to modify it in the future, while I'm not too familiarize on that show event. SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Singaporean Former DJs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Singaporean Former DJs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Zawl 15:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User_talk:Donner60— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry about the mistake. I saw the vandalism and thought I was reverting it but you got to it first. Thanks for that. Again, I am sorry that my mistake in not keeping all the changes on my page in order resulted in the above message being left on your talk page. Donner60 (talk) 02:35, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

It's ok, when I patrolling the recent changes, I saw that user was making the obscene edit at your talk page while I've remove it. Just forget about the mistake, cheers!. SA 13 Bro (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoccachhoc

Thank you for moving this page to the correct title. In future, however, please leave this sort of procedural maintenance to the SPI clerks. It's quite easy to get this subtly wrong, and in doing so create create more work for the clerks in the long run. Cheers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for the move, I'm patrolling for deals whether any master accounts that has global locked at SPI, then I saw the new case which OP has wrote about the mistake so I just help. I will heed on it, cheers too. SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quick note

Just as an FYI, it is never required to notify a user that an SPI has been filed. I typically never do when it is a case that involves a previously CU blocked user or one where I have reasonable grounds to believe that the notification could make the case more difficult to process. While there is nothing wrong with you notifying a user after the case has been filed, in the future, would you mind checking with me first if I am the party that has filed the case? I typically have a reason not to notify if I haven't done so, but am also fine with notification if someone else thinks that there is a good reason. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:11, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: OK, I'm patrolled at SPI for dealing any new reports of user master account that has been global locked, the user DrStrauss that I seemed on recent changes are quite frequently in the past, so I make the notification. Sorry about that, thanks for your FYI. SA 13 Bro (talk) 00:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Not a problem. This notification ended up fine, but sometimes there are reasons where it is best not to. Thanks for your work :) TonyBallioni (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:SA 13 Bro|'''<font color="red">S</font><font color="orange">A</font><font color="gold"> 1</font><font color="green">3</font><font color="blue"> B</font><font color="indigo">r</font><font color="violet">o</font>''']] ([[User talk:SA 13 Bro|talk]]) → SA 13 Bro (talk)

to

[[User:SA 13 Bro|<b style="color:red">S</b><b style="color:orange">A</b><b style="color:gold"> 1</b><b style="color:green">3</b><b style="color:blue"> B</b><b style="color:indigo">r</b><b style="color:violet">o</b>]] ([[User talk:SA 13 Bro|talk]]) → SA 13 Bro (talk)

Note: Your signature would go over the 255-character limit if I had used the usual markup like <span style="color:red">S</span>, but your signature is bold anyway, so using <b style="color:red">S</b> saved a few characters. Thanks to Redrose64 for showing me how to combine HTML markup to save characters; I don't see any other way I could have got this to fit!

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

@Anomalocaris:  Done, thanks for your notification, much appreciate to @Redrose64: SA 13 Bro (talk) 22:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Why is there a problem about the category added on Christina Vee's Page?

I don't understand. 2001:569:7671:F100:6806:57DC:A814:F459 (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

@2001:569:7671:F100:6806:57DC:A814:F459: Firstly, Salma Hayek was born in Mexico and she dwell with her career in United States, so she is American actresses of Mexican descent, which based on published web sources information from outside as per WP:CATDEF. As for Cristina Vee, she was born in United States, although she get questioned about her ethnicity and exposure about herself is Mexican, but the sources are not very quantity notable and also editorial bias on WP:NPOV, I think you should have a collaborative discussions with @AngusWOOF: SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

I'm waiting for news articles like this one [1] about fellow voice actress Xanthe Huynh. If the IP editor can find some like that for Cristina Vee, then that can be considered. But for now the AMA log indicates it is a passing mention. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Banned Wikipedia user Abd

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax (a.k.a. Daniel Lomax or User:Abd) is a Muslim, conspiracy theorist and crank who is a proponent of pseudoscientific cold fusion.

Lomax has a history of being banned on forums and wikis for trolling. Why do you support a guy who has been banned all over the web?

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Abd_ul-Rahman_Lomax 117.20.41.9 (talk) 03:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

I also don't know why you want to use an open proxy IPs for trolling at Meta-Wiki site. SA 13 Bro (talk) 03:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

I use the IP to remain anonymous. How is it trolling? The User Abd has been banned all over the web and on Wikipedia. He has been supporting a known sock-puppeteer Ben Steigmann, a known pseudoscience promoter. He also stalks and harasses a number of skeptical Wikipedia users in his stalking project here. He is not an admin or checkuser on metawiki yet he is hosting a libellous stalking project about several skeptical Wikipedia users that I know, he then claims they are all one person without evidence. He also claims he knows where people live and who their families are. Do you think that is acceptable? It is the oddest thing I have ever seen but Meta-Wiki does not even look at what he is posting. Maybe you can put a word in. Why is he aloud to slander innocent Wikipedia users and get away with it? He has an axe to grind against skeptics.

Also scroll to the bottom of his 'project' [2], he defends his friend Ben Steigmann a blocked Wikipedia editor and encourages him to continue to join Wikipedia. Ben Steigmann was recently blocked on four disruptive sock-puppets [3]. Yet Abd in his case study describes Ben's edits as 'harmless'. If you are un-biased and a neutral observer please look at this. Don't just blindly believe everything Abd says. Abuse is happening here. 117.20.41.9 (talk) 03:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

@178.209.40.102: Your open proxy IP was global block by User:Defender, not me. Please don't post at Meta-Wiki site, I am not interested about the User:Abd. SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SA 13 Bro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

My edits to Richard Hatch page - I'd like your advice

SA 13 Bro,

   This is CaptainMarc (with some help from his parents). I am 21 years old and a Survivor and reality show superfan. I am just starting to try to become a Wikipedia contrbutor so please excuse some mistakes I will make. I am trying to be careful and will be more careful from now on. I made some edits under the IP address ID 2601:646:8101:CFA8:FC19:B9AD:A286:DA86 which you reverted because I did not have sources. I should have been logged in to make those edits but didn't notice that I was not logged in.
   I did not think I would need to add a citation to change the name of the person since I did not see any citation for the original name and birth date. A few questions:

- Should I indeed put a citation in for the name? If so, how do I determine when to add a citation and when not? Is it ok to add citations to everything I do? The list will get very long. - Would this web.nacva.com/JFIA/Issues/JFIA-2017-No2-9.pdf serve as a good citation. It certainly appears to be from a non fly by night source

I would like to make this change and get it accepted as one of my first edits but will wait to hear from you to make sure I do it correctly.

thanks, CaptainMarc 2601:646:8101:CFA8:FC19:B9AD:A286:DA86 (talk) 22:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

What kind of information that you are trying to write about by citing this reference sources? SA 13 Bro (talk) 22:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

- I want to put in his full name "Richard Holman Hatch Jr" instead of "Richard Hatch" - His proper full name is documented in that source. 2601:646:8101:CFA8:FC19:B9AD:A286:DA86 (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

No problem, but must discuss a WP:Consensus first. @Tenebrae: Hi, you got any opinion on this reference sources which provided by the IP editor? SA 13 Bro (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Well, the Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting certainly appears to be a legitimate academic journal affiliated with Louisiana State University, and with an editorial board. The "open access" part is a little worrisome, but the magazine says, "Each article will be published electronically as soon as the editor, based upon advice from referees, determines that the manuscript meets the objectives and standards set forth by the editor and the journal's editorial board." And the author of this particular article is an assistant professor at the College of Business and Economics at West Virginia University. The section on Hatch's personal background is based, he says, "the indictments, exhibits, motions, notices, transcripts, supplemental records, responses, and orders in the Richard Hatch case, spanning the period September, 2005 to July, 2014...." I'd say this is actually a pretty good find. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

I'll try the legitimate academic journal source citation, if got any issue about the "open access" by other users, they can editorial on my talk page at any time. SA 13 Bro (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I think you should like this cute little cat, since you shared me some of your souvenir cats image and also a cat lover in the past. Hope everyday will be going well for you, my friend.

27.54.33.14 (talk) 23:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks to you, my friend. SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit?

That IP user from taiwan was removing the Chinese name, he is the vandaliser, not me[4].--170.78.75.25 (talk) 02:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

@170.78.75.25: Hello, did you mean this person User:Nipponese Dog Calvero? SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes, probably him. I'll now try calm down and not attacking him in edit summary (even though he does have "dog" in his user name and he's from Taiwan).--170.78.75.25 (talk) 02:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Can you also help on Sulfonyl? Much appreciated.--170.78.75.25 (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

I have make the report, while I am not a admin and can't do any protection on that. SA 13 Bro (talk) 03:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you.谢谢. sorry for my bad english. --170.78.75.25 (talk) 03:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Is OK, Welcome. :) SA 13 Bro (talk) 03:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

I reverted 170.78.75.25 edits on Sulfony. They seemed wrong including adding back circular links. TVGarfield (talk) 04:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

I think 170 might need some research if you check this edit [5] TVGarfield (talk) 05:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

@TVGarfield: Yes, thank you for reverted those IP disruptive editing, some of the articles that I request for protection was vandalism by the Geo-locate IP from Taiwan, NCD is one of the most popular LTA vandal from Taiwan, I maybe get shakes. Anyway, those IPs now have been blocked, so we just ignore it, any further persistence disruptive editing, it can be report to WP:AIV or WP:ANI. SA 13 Bro (talk) 07:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

RfPP

I didn't understand your note on RfPP. It seems that same person/group of IPs is doing it to other related articles. User:162.217.133.122 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) is reverting many of those. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

I am not too confirmed the situation, but there was some couple of IPs Geo-locate is came from the Taiwan, possible neither is maybe or may not. SA 13 Bro (talk) 04:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Could you help me submit a CU request at WP:SI? Since IP users cannot do it.

I suspected those IPs, apart from being similar to User:Nipponese Dog Calvero, might actually be User:O1lI0. These are all Taiwan mobile IPs, and they all engage in edit disputes with Chinese user/IPs, like User:O1lI0's behavior; also they all speak poor English, accused other users of sockpuppetery often using the word "sock". IPs used for check would be 49.217.4.143, 115.82.194.252, 101.13.0.0/16 and 101.12.194.0/24.--170.78.75.25 (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Why use vulgar words?And change my message. .https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A170.78.75.25&type=revision&diff=816856327&oldid=816856161

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A170.78.75.25&type=revision&diff=816855968&oldid=816855921 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A170.78.75.25&type=revision&diff=816855830&oldid=816855780--61.224.9.28 (talk) 05:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting the vandalism so quickly and efficiently on the pages Ybarro and Dynasty Warriors 6. Iggy (talk) 00:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

@Iggy the Swan: Thank you for your barnstar, My Royal Young are the most active vandal from Philippines, he usually like to use dynamic IP ranges to vandalize projects for personal amusement, one of the Tagalog Wikipedia admin WayKurat also familiarize about him as well. BTW, wish you have a prosperous of Happy New Year! Cheers! :) SA 13 Bro (talk) 00:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes hopefully there will not be any more from My Royal Young this year. I have kept an eye on all the pages (added to watchlist) this user has vandalised (USS ships, Ybarro etc.) since early December when I've noticed the user vandalising certain pages when ClueBot NG reverts them seven months ago and they come in waves of five or more. Iggy (talk) 00:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, and welcome for your good works. :) SA 13 Bro (talk) 00:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello iam a blocked user this is my 12 no, blocked account User:Shivam (Actor) my first accounts Globally blocked and user Talk page is also protected. Please help me, and Check my first account.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

SA 13 Bro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know that if iam going to blocking by using Multiple accounts sockpupeet is only my fault and iam accepted this. I think that iam blocking that the reason is using Multiple accounts sockpupeet and also I going to creating similar but defferent accounts. With sole propose of self publicity. Please if other reason I have been so I don't know that reason please give me one chance and unblock me soon please don't decline my request thanks please sir also I promise you I can doing this again thanks please unblock me sir, Than you

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I know that if iam going to blocking by using Multiple accounts sockpupeet is only my fault and iam accepted this. I think that iam blocking that the reason is using Multiple accounts sockpupeet and also I going to creating similar but defferent accounts. With sole propose of self publicity. Please if other reason I have been so I don't know that reason please give me one chance and unblock me soon please don't decline my request thanks please sir also I promise you I can doing this again thanks please unblock me sir, Than you |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know that if iam going to blocking by using Multiple accounts sockpupeet is only my fault and iam accepted this. I think that iam blocking that the reason is using Multiple accounts sockpupeet and also I going to creating similar but defferent accounts. With sole propose of self publicity. Please if other reason I have been so I don't know that reason please give me one chance and unblock me soon please don't decline my request thanks please sir also I promise you I can doing this again thanks please unblock me sir, Than you |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know that if iam going to blocking by using Multiple accounts sockpupeet is only my fault and iam accepted this. I think that iam blocking that the reason is using Multiple accounts sockpupeet and also I going to creating similar but defferent accounts. With sole propose of self publicity. Please if other reason I have been so I don't know that reason please give me one chance and unblock me soon please don't decline my request thanks please sir also I promise you I can doing this again thanks please unblock me sir, Than you |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}