Talk:Course-of-values recursion: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Ackermann's function?: I added about that in the article |
→Misleading sentence: new section |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
<s>Is there opposition to merging this into [[Primitive recursive function]]?</s> [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
:Never mind; I expanded it in place. [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert|talk]]</small> 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Misleading sentence == |
|||
As far as I cans tell "the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence" sentence at the beginning of the article is misleading. It should be: |
|||
"the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence '''by a primitive recursive function'''". |
|||
At first I was very puzzled, then I kept reading the full article and indeed it is explained below that h must be primitive-recursive. |
Revision as of 09:18, 15 May 2018
![]() | Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
Merge?
Is there opposition to merging this into Primitive recursive function? CMummert 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind; I expanded it in place. CMummert · talk 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Misleading sentence
As far as I cans tell "the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence" sentence at the beginning of the article is misleading. It should be:
"the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence by a primitive recursive function".
At first I was very puzzled, then I kept reading the full article and indeed it is explained below that h must be primitive-recursive.