Talk:Course-of-values recursion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Misleading sentence: new section |
m Signing comment by 88.191.80.254 - "→Misleading sentence: new section" |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
"the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence '''by a primitive recursive function'''". |
"the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence '''by a primitive recursive function'''". |
||
At first I was very puzzled, then I kept reading the full article and indeed it is explained below that h must be primitive-recursive. |
At first I was very puzzled, then I kept reading the full article and indeed it is explained below that h must be primitive-recursive. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.191.80.254|88.191.80.254]] ([[User talk:88.191.80.254#top|talk]]) 09:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 09:19, 15 May 2018
 | Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Merge?
Is there opposition to merging this into Primitive recursive function? CMummert 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind; I expanded it in place. CMummert · talk 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Misleading sentence
As far as I cans tell "the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence" sentence at the beginning of the article is misleading. It should be:
"the value of f(n+1) is computed from the sequence by a primitive recursive function".
At first I was very puzzled, then I kept reading the full article and indeed it is explained below that h must be primitive-recursive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.191.80.254 (talk) 09:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)