Jump to content

Talk:Dakota Access Pipeline protests: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Proposal: That's automatic.
Line 27: Line 27:


*'''Support''' as formalizer of proposal. - [[User:CorbieVreccan|<span style="color:#44018F;font-family:georgia">'''Co<font color= "#003878">rb<font color= "#145073">ie</font><font color= "#006E0D">V</font></font>'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER|☼]] 16:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
*'''Support''' as formalizer of proposal. - [[User:CorbieVreccan|<span style="color:#44018F;font-family:georgia">'''Co<font color= "#003878">rb<font color= "#145073">ie</font><font color= "#006E0D">V</font></font>'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER|☼]] 16:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
*'''Support''' [[User:Indigenous girl|Indigenous girl]] ([[User talk:Indigenous girl|talk]]) 16:20, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:20, 25 October 2016

WikiProject iconUnited States: North Dakota Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota.
WikiProject iconEnvironment Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndigenous peoples of North America Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sorting this out

So sorry to start it in this jumbled form with so much redundant content. I have no idea where to begin sorting this out. Please help.

Maybe a timeline would be a good way to handle things. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What should be in this article and its sources

Should this article be the headquarters for all of this, with a teeny summary section and a {{main}} in Standing Rock Indian Reservation, Bakken pipeline, and ReZpect Our Water?

Should ReZpect Our Water be a section within this article and not exist as a standalone? Best wishes and thanks again. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where this article came from

This was originally just the sections about the protests at Standing Rock Indian Reservation and Bakken pipeline copy pasted here. That content remains at those articles but should be stripped away to deter expansion there. New info should land here. Content at those two articles plus content at ReZpect Our Water makes coverage of this notable subject shared by three articles, now four. There is plenty of unique and duplicate content at the those other three articles. Please help get this sorted out. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For now I think that the best thing to do would be to rename the ReZpect article to the name being used for this one, or whatever name we agree on. Gandydancer (talk) 13:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, see below. - CorbieV 16:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal

As @Gandydancer: has spent much of the summer doing the research, sourcing and writing for this article and all the ones that use content for it, I am making the above proposal formal, that we:
Rename ReZpect Our Water to Dakota Access Pipeline protests, and use the Rezpect article as the base for incorporating any new content (such as what has been added to the DAPp article over the last 22 hrs since its creation).
The Rezpect article is more comprehensive, and that was the name most-sourced when the news coverage began. But now the Dakota Access name is thoroughly-sourced and has become more prominent. I think the actual ReZpect group can be a subsection in that article, and we can try to fit as much as possible in one place unless it needs to be moved out into its own main article for space reasons. - CorbieV 16:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]