Jump to content

User talk:The Hybrid: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 238: Line 238:


This is very true. Admins conspire with [[Jimmy Wales|God]] and the [[WP:LOC|Cabal]] for the benefit of all humanity (apart from the [[Encyclopædia Britannica]] bastards). [[User:Suriel1981|<font color="#9400D2" face="comic sans ms"><strong>ŞůṜīΣĻ</strong></font><font color="#00008C" face="Papyrus">¹98¹</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Suriel1981|<font COLOR="#DC143C"><strong>Speak</strong></font>]]</sup><sub>[[User:Suriel1981/Autographs|<font COLOR="#DC143C"><strong>Sign</strong></font>]]</sub> 02:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
This is very true. Admins conspire with [[Jimmy Wales|God]] and the [[WP:LOC|Cabal]] for the benefit of all humanity (apart from the [[Encyclopædia Britannica]] bastards). [[User:Suriel1981|<font color="#9400D2" face="comic sans ms"><strong>ŞůṜīΣĻ</strong></font><font color="#00008C" face="Papyrus">¹98¹</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Suriel1981|<font COLOR="#DC143C"><strong>Speak</strong></font>]]</sup><sub>[[User:Suriel1981/Autographs|<font COLOR="#DC143C"><strong>Sign</strong></font>]]</sub> 02:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

== What? ==
You've got what? --[[User:Atomic Religione]]

Revision as of 05:07, 6 April 2007

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:The_Hybrid.

This is the User talk page for The Hybrid
Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page by starting a new thread. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.
Talk page guidelines
Please respect Wikiquette, assume good faith and be nice, and bear in mind what Wikipedia is not.

User:The Hybrid/Talkheader

Archive
Archives
1 - 2 - 3
4 - 5 - 6
7 - 8 - 9
10 - 11 - V
12 - 13 - 14



How Do You Get Your Signature To Do That?

If you get the chance could you please put it on my user page how you get your signature to have all those links so I can do that with my signature!Cowboy Rocco 00:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


DDF

Hey again, I just finished adding the final touches to the main page of the Devil May Cry task force I created, just wanted to see what you think of it , what can be improved? Cheers!-DDF 01:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for reverting the move you made I didn't noticed it, but yeah in my browser they look kind of weird. --DDF

I'll leave them there it's probably my browser, I will check tommorow on a PC at college to see if it is. Cheers! --DDF 04:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man I just finished reading Gimmick (professional wrestling) and it really needs a super cleanup-cut, the article has a list that is rigged with POV and it's unencyclopedic in tone but without it the article is extremely short should I just cut the whole thing or what is recomended here? 22:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No biggie, I have also been kind of busy improving Devil May Cry and Devil May Cry 3 among other DMC pages, as soon as you have time for it just leave me a message on my talk page, Cheers! - 06:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Thanks for signing! (not)(listening)

DMC task force

I used clear instead of br... is that the formatting what you were trying to get? JACOPLANE • 2007-03-28 18:22

Hey

Hey Hybrid, i might be sticking my nose where it doesnt belong but, i would like to know whats going on between you and Big Boss 0,you dont have to answer if you dont wish to. --ÄtΘmicR€£igionesїgñ

Plan (read all)

Long story short we have to put up a defense. We could be dealing with some major problems with Nightmare 81 and his friends. He doesn't know about it yet. But we have to be ready for anything. Big Boss 0 16:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a chance that we may be blocked for no reason. Possibly as somebody's sockpuppets. As far as his friends I have no idea who the hell they are. I tried to get him to tell me who they were a week ago but he refused to tell me. All he said is that everything would be taken care of. We are a threat to his plan because we know what he will do. We have to keep an eye out for this. Who knows. We might even recieve mass amounts of vandalism. I do not know what he is capable of yet. I do not know his potential as a vandal yet. I have as much information as you none at all.

On a side note who do you think will win at wrestlemania? Please respond to all listed matches on my userpage. Big Boss 0 21:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This link may be a clue to where it is. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ANightmare_81&diff=117036717&oldid=93607656 Big Boss 0 21:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You missed what I said. There is a possability that Nightmare may have his friends block us for no reason. They may also accuse us of being someone's sockpuppets or something. Just keep you eyes open in case something along these lines happens to me or you.

Wrestlemania victory
  • MiTB=Edge
  • Kane vs Khali=Kane
  • Origionals vs New Breed = New Breed
  • Women's Championship=Ashley
  • U.S. Championship=MVP
  • BotB=Lashley (However both will probably end up bald.)
  • World Heavyweight Championship=Undertaker
  • WWE Championship=Cena

Can i put who I think will win? If so here are my predictions:

  • MiTB=Edge, because I'm sure he is planning to take a second go at the Rayed R champion bit
  • Originals vs New Breed= Who cares really, I guess Originals
  • Womens Championship:Melina, the heel winning would be a good shocker
  • BoTB= Umaga (with help from the whole freakin lockeroom)
  • U.s championship: Beniot, he needs some steam to keep going
  • World Heavyweight championship= Could go either way, if undertaker loses its a big sign of him retiring soon
  • WWE championship= HBK, becuase he needs one more claim to fame, and i think everyones had enough of cena --ÄtΘmicR€£igionesїgñ

RE: Hall of Fame

I'll buy the next box set when it comes out. Bmg916SpeakSign 21:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unshure

I have no idea if he is lying or not. But I have a fellingg that we may find out soon. If he is all the more power to us. If he's not then we are in serious trouble. I do not know yet. Big Boss 0 01:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a releif. Anyway what did User: Essjay do? Tell me please. Big Boss 0 04:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Anyway what do you think of the wrestlemania results? Big Boss 0 04:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did the Cena, HBK match steal the show? But the Batista & Undertaker match sounded pretty exciting. Big Boss 0 13:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this the first time that the World Tag Team Champions faced each other at Wrestlemania? Big Boss 0 13:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, Rey and Eddie faced off at WM 21. Bmg916SpeakSign 13:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie and Rey were the WWE Tag Team Champions. Not the World Tag Team Champions. Is this the first Wrestlemania where the World Tag Team Champions faced each other? Big Boss 0 19:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WrestleMania III

You might also want to keep an eye on WrestleMania III. There are about two admins on the talk there that oppose the addition of the supposed dispute of the attendance record that was started by Meltzer. -- bulletproof 3:16 05:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

Wikipedia was down for a couple mins. LazyLaces 13:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devil May Cry nominated for Featured Article

Please vote and make your suggestions here -- 18:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer Me

Hybrid you didn't answer my question. Here it is again.

Eddie and Rey were the WWE Tag Team Champions. Not the World Tag Team Champions. Is this the first Wrestlemania where the World Tag Team Champions faced each other? Big Boss 0 19:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Big Boss 0 22:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ops. Forgot to put it back before talking to you. Anyway I think this was the first time the World Tag Team Champions faced each other at Wrestlemania. I'll mention it. Big Boss 0 22:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I left the question on the talk section of the Wrestlemania page. Maybe we will get an answer soon. Big Boss 0 22:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Big Boss 0

For whatever reason, I asked him civilly on his talk page to stop adding the DX info to the WM23 article. However, he seems to continue to remove my comment. I feel that is against policy, at least, I read that you should only delete other peoples' comments if they are uncivil or offensive in nature, which my comment were neither. I added it again after the first time he removed it, but he did his little redirect thing, and when you reverted it, it was no longer there. *shrug* ---- GIGGAS2 | Talk 22:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


RE:User Page

Oh hey what's up Hybrid? So . . . his user page got deleted, you made your comment, which it looks like I agree completely with, and Ryulong hasn't responded? I guess not much can be done. Maybe he should just recreate it minus age info? --Tractorkingsfan 22:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sign?

Would you mind to sign my sig. page? If not, that's cool. Wikizilla Signme!Complaints Dept. 00:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holla holla

Cheers for signing my new autograph book ŞůṜīΣϹ98¹SpeakSign 03:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yo

Click here! I finally got settled in a project I like, I'v been editing heavily on one article. Click here!. See all the pics? Yeah those... I uploaded all of them (except for The Lost Warrior). As the saying goes... "An article without pics is really not an article yet." I've made 3942 edits total and 2344 last month. Ya know a week lonk break helped me get over my editcountitus (¿spell?). Ya know with out you I probably wouldn't be even thinking about uploading pics unto articles or even leaving my userspace. Its been a while, how have things been going for you? Well speak to you later, Hearty Regards, — Darkest Hour 22:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Just chillin'. Although my great uncle died. Had breathing problems then got nemonia. Passed away at about 11Pm toward the end of March. Too bad I didn't get to see him more than every now and then. I'm sad and happy. Sad he's gone, happy he's not in pain... — Darkest Hour 22:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
...hmmmm... I'll speak to you soon, — Darkest Hour 23:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Adam1090

Could you help me keep an eye on Steel cage match? This user keeps replacing free images with copyrighted ones. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now his sock is giving him awards. Great...-- bulletproof 3:16 23:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Awww, that's adorable! Bmg916SpeakSign 23:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your adoptee

Have you spoken with Id Rather Be Hated For Who I Am, Than Loved For Who I Am Not about a name change? John Reaves (talk) 23:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

haha thanks Hybrid :) i will say logging in has been a bit annoying lately:P yes i will change my name :) thanks (Id Rather Be Hated For Who I Am, Than Loved For Who I Am Not 00:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Archiving

Peace indeed! I really feel uncomfortable with the whole wikipedia attitude to archiving. If my talk page can spark a debate about that, and a really solid, non-acrimonious debate, that is something I would welcome. My approach to internet/computing is entirely based on search (and I work for a search engine as well) and I would like to see archives that were search friendly, which is not the case right now. I am being transparent to the extent that whatever irregular expressions you pump into searching on my page will give a good result. Its images and especially videos not text that create real digital space issues so one way and another you could say my talk page is a statement. And very happy to receive any kind of feedback re this issue and to engage in debate. What do you think?, SqueakBox 03:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Torrie Wilson

Please explain your latest edits on Torrie Wilson. You claim the fair use images you removed were in "violation of policy." What policy? How were they in violation? And where does it say .gif images are not allowed in articles?

In addition, removing the images is not the only thing you did...please explain the other changes you made to the article regarding it's text as well. I believe there is no reasoning behind them, especially in the removal of references. --JohnDoe0007 06:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude...

Put this into your monobook.css. + ctlr + shift + r

/* change the logo */

# p-logo a { background: url(/media/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Deer_Park_Globe.png) 35% 50% no-repeat !important; }
Now if only I can find a way to change the link... — Darkest Hour 22:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
You didn't try it out, you don't even know if it was cooler than the original logo... *snif* :( You mean to say the code looks good? But you don't want to bother with it. Go ahead click the red button and blow away the universe.
Hm... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darkest Hour (talkcontribs) 23:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

RE: Adam1090

Let me know if he does another one with the Adam account, I'll report to Yamla, who somewhat specializes (and has little tolerance) in vandals who place the wiki in legal jeopardy. Bmg916SpeakSign 23:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Deskana might want to help with that too. I'll be on the lookout for more socks. Thank you for your help Hybrid. This is very much appreciated.-- bulletproof 3:16 23:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE. Torrie Wilson

Thanks for the response...This ruling of fair use images of living persons...where is this documented? There are instances of this (as well as discussions) arguing this type of thing (notebly playboy covers in multiple WWE Diva biographical articles) in multiple places...If there really is a rule that trumps the arguement for fair use, then it would be helpful in ending the discussions...

Why haven't I heard about this before? and not only me, but all the people arguing... --JohnDoe0007 04:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Well now wait a minute. If there really were such a ruling "per order of Jimbo Wales himself" as you say, especially one based on "a legal issue," why in the hell would it be "buried somewhere within Wikipedia on some obscure page linking to Jimbo's overruling of the community that [you] will never find again?" That definitely makes no sense to me, which adds to my previous doubt, due in part to me, nor any of the other scores of users currently debating about such images never having heard of such a mandate. And such an important one at that. Why would Jimbo bother himself to basically make an executive order to end such fuss and then allow it to fall into the landfill of ignorance? And certainly, someone involved in, or running across such discussions would have heard of such a ruling...but I've never seen anyone else mention it.

In addition to all of this, your comment of the source of such a ruling not being pertinent ("it isn't important anyway") is of great concern. You expect me and others to believe and follow a "policy" you claim is the soul grounds for your grave actions of removal of content and then claim its source isn't important? --JohnDoe0007 05:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hybrid. Sorry to get in on your discussion last night. As I told John, I was bored. Is this the section of the policy you refer to:
Any non-free media used on Wikipedia must meet all of these criteria: No free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information. If unfree material can be transformed into free material, it should be done instead of using a "fair use" defense. For example, the information in a newspaper article can easily be used as the basis of an original article and then cited as a reference. Maps and diagrams can often be redrawn from original sources, though simply "tracing" copyrighted material does not make it free. Neither photographs nor sound clips, however, can usually be "transformed" in this way. However, if the subject of the photograph still exists, a freely-licensed photograph could be taken. (emphasis mine).

That shows that it is policy, regardless of where it came from. --Tractorkingsfan 00:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for showing me how to get my signature to have those links on it. Cowboy Rocco 17:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Nash

I heard that once Nash's contract with TNA is up that he might sign with WWE again. I also heard that we might see an nWo reunion if this occurs. Nash said that if Hogan and Hall were willing to do so that he would. Hall apparently has agreed and so has Hogan. What do you think? Big Boss 0 21:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you read that Hogan and Hall had agreed to that?? There's no chance of Hall wrestling in WWE again. Nash's health problems preclude him from wrestling. Hogan and Vince are not on good terms. None of these three have wrestled a proper schedule in AGES. Please don't post this on any articles. ŞůṜīΣϹ98¹SpeakSign 22:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious

"This user is sick of hearing about how evil the admins are. Admins oppose edits and/or actions that violate policy. They do not conspire with the Forces of Darkness", NICE!! HAHAHAHA, why does "this user" link to god?!?! SO RANDOM!! Props on awesome headline thing --ÄtΘmicR€£igionesїgñ

This is very true. Admins conspire with God and the Cabal for the benefit of all humanity (apart from the Encyclopædia Britannica bastards). ŞůṜīΣϹ98¹SpeakSign 02:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

What?

You've got what? --User:Atomic Religione