Template talk:Non-free currency: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:54, 7 December 2007

Numismatics Template‑class

	Numismatics portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Fair use (inactive)

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Fair use, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Fair useWikipedia:WikiProject Fair useTemplate:WikiProject Fair useFair use

Copyrighted currency?

I tried Google and I looked through more Wikipedia talk page archives than I can count but I couldn't find any discussion anywhere about images of currency being copyrighted and only being usable under fair use. Can someone educate me on this? US currency seems to be copyright free; are there countries where this is not the case and their money possesses a copyright enforceable under US law?

I would try asking the creator of this template but he seems to have, um, broken up with Wikipedia. — GT 21:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Irish money for an example of money that (IMHO) possesses a copyright enforceable under US law. Also, User:Quadell wrote "It's good to be back" in this edit and appears to still be back, so that user may be amenable to being asked. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Linkimage

Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template is screwed up.

Does it really make sense to have a template that's ambiguous about whether the item it applies to is public domain or free, yet categorizing it into non-free media like other fair use templates? —Random832 18:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 [[Template:{{ucfirst:Linkimage}}]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Linkimage|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> &nbsp; — [[User:JeffGent|Jeff G.]] <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">([[User talk:JeffGent|talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/User:JeffGent|contribs]])</span> 23:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
+== This template is screwed up. ==
+Does it really make sense to have a template that's ambiguous about whether the item it applies to is public domain or free, yet categorizing it into non-free media like other fair use templates? —[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] 18:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)