Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis and Administration: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:20, 20 September 2005

Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis and Administration

Feddle gubmint jibberjabbercruft. Heavy use of the word 'We' makes me think this was cut & pasted (or hacked) by a govco drone with too much time on his hands. Viva Liberty! Delete The Government! Eddie.willers 22:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Clean up Has been tagged for clean up for a year. I am going to add it to my to do list and remove first person point of view. Long live big government! Psy guy ^(talk) 22:58, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh puhleeeze! The fact that it has been tagged for clean up for this long means that either it's of no interest or no one with sufficient knowledge has stepped forward to undertake the cleanup. Additionally, the article suffers from obscurity in that it fails to sufficiently explain the position within the federal superstructure of this particular office. If that wasn't enough, since when did minor collections of govco drones become notable?? What has this department achieved that merits an encyclopaedic article? Answers on a post card please... Eddie.willers 23:05, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup, government agencies are valid topics. User:Zoe|^(talk) 00:05, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have wikified and de-waffled it somethat, and cleared out the "we"'s. Some government office may have a policy of describing themselves on Wikipedia. Anthony Appleyard 08:20, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ** Oh puhleeeze! The fact that it has been tagged for clean up for this long means that either it's of no interest or no one with sufficient knowledge has stepped forward to undertake the cleanup. Additionally, the article suffers from obscurity in that it fails to sufficiently explain the position within the federal superstructure of this particular office. If that wasn't enough, since when did minor collections of govco drones become notable?? What has this department achieved that merits an encyclopaedic article? Answers on a post card please... [[User:Eddie.willers|Eddie.willers]] 23:05, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' and '''cleanup''', government agencies are valid topics.  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 00:05, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
+*I have wikified and de-waffled it somethat, and cleared out the "we"'s. Some government office may have a policy of describing themselves on Wikipedia. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] 08:20, 20 September 2005 (UTC)