User talk:Karl Meier: Difference between revisions
Irishpunktom (talk | contribs) |
Irishpunktom (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==[[Dhul-Qarnayn]]== |
==[[Dhul-Qarnayn]]== |
||
As detailed on the Talk page, I have removed the inherently POV additions made by that user, and am in the process of going through each point sourced and refrenced and will re-add a newer POV free entry probably tomorrow. Again, I remind you, referring to edits you disagree with as Vandalism is in itslef a form of Vandalism. --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 17:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC) |
As detailed on the Talk page, I have removed the inherently POV additions made by that user, and am in the process of going through each point sourced and refrenced and will re-add a newer POV free entry probably tomorrow. Again, I remind you, referring to edits you disagree with as Vandalism is in itslef a form of Vandalism. --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 17:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
: As I have previously stated, the reasons for the edit are stated on the talk page.. YOu've read it, and added to it.. or have you forgotten? This is a serious edit and process going on here. You are the one being disruptive. --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 17:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:41, 3 October 2005
My evidence
I changed my POV statement to say "monitoring". --Phroziac (talk) 15:23, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- I did that. Sorry, I did not see the talk page. --Phroziac (talk) 15:54, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
re:removal of comments on RFAr
I honestly don't know how that comment dissapeared I didn't do it purposely and I've already told Fadix as such User talk:Fadix. The comment has already been put back and I apologize for any convienience that caused. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 23:49, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
suggestions for Kurdish people
I noticed that you and Cool Cat have been having some issues on that article, I have suggested to him and now am suggesting to you that if a piece of info is unsourced it should be removed and copied over to the talk page where it can easily be discussed and can be re-added if anyone finds a valid source for it. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 00:37, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
Open proxy
It's hard to verify that is an open proxy, but SORBS hasn't heard of it, although arin.net returns a rather cryptic result. Why do you think it's an open proxy? It's only edited once, although I rather suspect it may be Irishpunktom circumventing my block. -Splashtalk 21:49, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- I see. Blocked indefinitely, but will have to report that to WP:AN/I in a sec. What of the other IPs editing the article? Are they proxies too? -Splashtalk 21:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. -Splashtalk 22:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cool_Cat/Wiki-politics
I have placed his character assassination page to deletion. Fadix 22:18, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- BTW, why is it not listed here? Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/Today
- I thought it was automated, using the template, to recopy the material. The history suggest it to be like that, since the last edit was done in September 9. Anyway, I'll ask Davenbelle. Regards Fadix 22:54, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Just to let you know, I respectfully ask you to try and refrain from using personal attacks. You have not used any right now, but I already told Fadix and Cool Cat (twice) the same thing, so at least we could try to have a civil discussion. I know that you are on this hit list, and I would not be amused to be on such a list. Zach (Sound Off) 17:55, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- I thought it was automated, using the template, to recopy the material. The history suggest it to be like that, since the last edit was done in September 9. Anyway, I'll ask Davenbelle. Regards Fadix 22:54, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
As detailed on the Talk page, I have removed the inherently POV additions made by that user, and am in the process of going through each point sourced and refrenced and will re-add a newer POV free entry probably tomorrow. Again, I remind you, referring to edits you disagree with as Vandalism is in itslef a form of Vandalism. --Irishpunktom\talk 17:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- As I have previously stated, the reasons for the edit are stated on the talk page.. YOu've read it, and added to it.. or have you forgotten? This is a serious edit and process going on here. You are the one being disruptive. --Irishpunktom\talk 17:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)