Jump to content

User talk:Hammersoft: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
resp
Line 9: Line 9:
--[[User:WickerGuy|WickerGuy]] ([[User talk:WickerGuy|talk]]) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
--[[User:WickerGuy|WickerGuy]] ([[User talk:WickerGuy|talk]]) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
*I've limited time today, and given the severity of the debates I am currently in elsewhere involving tens of thousands of articles, one article isn't enough to draw my attention today :) My apologies, but I won't get to this for a while. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft#top|talk]]) 20:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
*I've limited time today, and given the severity of the debates I am currently in elsewhere involving tens of thousands of articles, one article isn't enough to draw my attention today :) My apologies, but I won't get to this for a while. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft#top|talk]]) 20:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

==Resp==
Re: "''Fine. I'll just duplicate it into the sunset. It's just a friggin' small text comment. What does it matter?????????????''"

:It matters because it removes the context of my comment. It's also is specifically mentioned in [[WP:TALK]]: "''It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already...responded to your statement. ''"

:Lastly, you could just change the timestamp to 2 November, like I did, and it will do what you want it to do without having constant updates. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 17:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:17, 29 October 2009

User:Hammersoft/NotFreeAnymore


Hammersoft, I have replied on my talk page to your concerns about the Kubrick article. Feel free to remove this from your page when you have viewed it.--WickerGuy (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a bit of rethinking on photo priorities. --WickerGuy (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've limited time today, and given the severity of the debates I am currently in elsewhere involving tens of thousands of articles, one article isn't enough to draw my attention today :) My apologies, but I won't get to this for a while. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resp

Re: "Fine. I'll just duplicate it into the sunset. It's just a friggin' small text comment. What does it matter?????????????"

It matters because it removes the context of my comment. It's also is specifically mentioned in WP:TALK: "It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already...responded to your statement. "
Lastly, you could just change the timestamp to 2 November, like I did, and it will do what you want it to do without having constant updates. — BQZip01 — talk 17:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]