User talk:Hammersoft: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Hammersoft (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
resp |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:WickerGuy|WickerGuy]] ([[User talk:WickerGuy|talk]]) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
--[[User:WickerGuy|WickerGuy]] ([[User talk:WickerGuy|talk]]) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
*I've limited time today, and given the severity of the debates I am currently in elsewhere involving tens of thousands of articles, one article isn't enough to draw my attention today :) My apologies, but I won't get to this for a while. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft#top|talk]]) 20:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
*I've limited time today, and given the severity of the debates I am currently in elsewhere involving tens of thousands of articles, one article isn't enough to draw my attention today :) My apologies, but I won't get to this for a while. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft#top|talk]]) 20:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Resp== |
|||
Re: "''Fine. I'll just duplicate it into the sunset. It's just a friggin' small text comment. What does it matter?????????????''" |
|||
:It matters because it removes the context of my comment. It's also is specifically mentioned in [[WP:TALK]]: "''It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already...responded to your statement. ''" |
|||
:Lastly, you could just change the timestamp to 2 November, like I did, and it will do what you want it to do without having constant updates. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''— ''BQZip01'' —'''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 17:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:17, 29 October 2009
User:Hammersoft/NotFreeAnymore
Hammersoft, I have replied on my talk page to your concerns about the Kubrick article. Feel free to remove this from your page when you have viewed it.--WickerGuy (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
I have posted a bit of rethinking on photo priorities. --WickerGuy (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've limited time today, and given the severity of the debates I am currently in elsewhere involving tens of thousands of articles, one article isn't enough to draw my attention today :) My apologies, but I won't get to this for a while. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Resp
Re: "Fine. I'll just duplicate it into the sunset. It's just a friggin' small text comment. What does it matter?????????????"
- It matters because it removes the context of my comment. It's also is specifically mentioned in WP:TALK: "It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already...responded to your statement. "
- Lastly, you could just change the timestamp to 2 November, like I did, and it will do what you want it to do without having constant updates. — BQZip01 — talk 17:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)