Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbidden knowledge: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Delete: "Secrecy" and "Classified information" might be topics, but "forbidden knowledge" is a duplicate. Also, this is really just an expanded dictdef. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 18:59, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
*Delete: "Secrecy" and "Classified information" might be topics, but "forbidden knowledge" is a duplicate. Also, this is really just an expanded dictdef. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 18:59, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Delete strange essay. -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]]|[[User talk:Cyrius|✎]] 03:26, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
*Delete strange essay. -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]]|[[User talk:Cyrius|✎]] 03:26, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Retain: The essay is balanced, neutral and useful. It is not personal. If it is short it should be expanded. The topic is useful. Me thinks the votes for deletion don't want this topic exposed. [[User:Moshiah|Moshiah]] |
|||
Revision as of 14:14, 27 July 2004
This is more of a personal essay; even if this is an encyclopedia topic, which I don't think it is, this isn't the article for it. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:47, 2004 Jul 26 (UTC)
- Delete: "Secrecy" and "Classified information" might be topics, but "forbidden knowledge" is a duplicate. Also, this is really just an expanded dictdef. Geogre 18:59, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete strange essay. -- Cyrius|✎ 03:26, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Retain: The essay is balanced, neutral and useful. It is not personal. If it is short it should be expanded. The topic is useful. Me thinks the votes for deletion don't want this topic exposed. Moshiah