Talk:Wide-body aircraft: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No "gayness" of that type please |
Quite right |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<HR> |
<HR> |
||
Please not be using the term "gayness" in that manor, it is not appropriate for Wikipedia. |
Please not be using the term "gayness" in that manor, it is not appropriate for Wikipedia. |
||
: Sorry - you are quite right, of course. There was an anon contributor a few days back who marked almost every edit as "removing gayness" - the lord only knows why. Lots of people complained and he stopped. (I would have complained myself, but there were plenty of others beat me to it.) This was just my little in-joke. No offence intended. [[User:Tannin|Tannin]] |
Revision as of 12:18, 19 February 2003
I thought a Jumbo Jet was a 747 only. Mintguy
- Hard to say, Mintguy, as it's a term used by people who know so little about aircraft that they don't know the difference between a 747 and an A-330 anyway. (Never mind 777s and DC-10s and L-1011s.) Sorry to be snotty about it, but dat's da trufh. It should be Wide-body aircraft.
- Wel there's an anomaly that needs to be resolved one way or the other because Jumbo jet has this info whilst Jumbo Jet redirects to the 747. Mintguy
- I agree with Mintguy, Jumbo Jet is, in my not-so-humble opinion, used only for the 747. I think that if you asked the public what a jumbo jet was most would try to describe a 747 ie the one with the bulge on top. Wide body is a more general description covering the biggies but I don't think we should use jumbo jet for them. Arpingstone 19:29 Feb 11, 2003 (UTC)
- A bit more info - the wide bodies are these:
- Ilyushin IL86
- Airbus A300, A310, A330 and A340
- DC10 and MD11
- Boeing 747, 767 and 777
- Tristar
- Arpingstone 20:19 Feb 11, 2003 (UTC)
- A bit more info - the wide bodies are these:
Please not be using the term "gayness" in that manor, it is not appropriate for Wikipedia.
- Sorry - you are quite right, of course. There was an anon contributor a few days back who marked almost every edit as "removing gayness" - the lord only knows why. Lots of people complained and he stopped. (I would have complained myself, but there were plenty of others beat me to it.) This was just my little in-joke. No offence intended. Tannin