User talk:KINGPORUS: Difference between revisions
Crawford88 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Crawford88|Crawford88]] ([[User talk:Crawford88|talk]]) 05:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC) |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Crawford88|Crawford88]] ([[User talk:Crawford88|talk]]) 05:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
== January 2018 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Karna]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:The Mighty Glen|The Mighty Glen]] ([[User talk:The Mighty Glen|talk]]) 15:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:31, 29 January 2018
December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arjuna has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arjuna was changed by KINGPORUS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893033 on 2017-12-06T21:50:40+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arjuna has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arjuna was changed by KINGPORUS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850947 on 2017-12-16T16:17:46+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bhargavastra
Hello KINGPORUS,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bhargavastra for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Template:Z166
Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Dec, 2017
You are edit WP:WARing on Karna. Your edit lacks citations and are disruptive. If you want to contribute, please build consensus on talk page before doing contentious edits. You have been warned. Crawford88 (talk) 05:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
You have violated WP:3RR rule and are reported for the same.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Crawford88 (talk) 05:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
January 2018

Your recent editing history at Karna shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)