Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Life Liberation Army: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: Line 13:
* '''Comment''' -- Suggest hold for more research. Have found links, video footage, references from mainstream press e.g. New York Times, interviews, etc. Significant ramifications for future 3D worlds. 03:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) [[User:ScholarScola]]
* '''Comment''' -- Suggest hold for more research. Have found links, video footage, references from mainstream press e.g. New York Times, interviews, etc. Significant ramifications for future 3D worlds. 03:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) [[User:ScholarScola]]
**'''Response''' -- You found one link to a site which requires a log on. It is my understanding such links aren't usable as sources. The interview has a large focus on the content rendered in the article for deletion, so it doesn't really hold that much weight as a source. [[User:Signpostmarv|Signpostmarv]] 04:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
**'''Response''' -- You found one link to a site which requires a log on. It is my understanding such links aren't usable as sources. The interview has a large focus on the content rendered in the article for deletion, so it doesn't really hold that much weight as a source. [[User:Signpostmarv|Signpostmarv]] 04:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''delete''' rubbish like like shld be confined to the article on the game or whatever it is, if that is even notable&nbsp;<span style="background-color: #000000">&nbsp;<font color="white">'''&rArr;'''</font> <font color="white">[[User:Bsnowball|bsnowball]]</font>&nbsp;</span> 10:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:40, 6 December 2006

Second Life Liberation Army (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Not notable enough to deserve own article - admits only ten members.