Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Life Liberation Army: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Signpostmarv (talk | contribs) →[[Second Life Liberation Army]]: response to comment |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* '''Comment''' -- Suggest hold for more research. Have found links, video footage, references from mainstream press e.g. New York Times, interviews, etc. Significant ramifications for future 3D worlds. 03:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) [[User:ScholarScola]] |
* '''Comment''' -- Suggest hold for more research. Have found links, video footage, references from mainstream press e.g. New York Times, interviews, etc. Significant ramifications for future 3D worlds. 03:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) [[User:ScholarScola]] |
||
**'''Response''' -- You found one link to a site which requires a log on. It is my understanding such links aren't usable as sources. The interview has a large focus on the content rendered in the article for deletion, so it doesn't really hold that much weight as a source. [[User:Signpostmarv|Signpostmarv]] 04:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
**'''Response''' -- You found one link to a site which requires a log on. It is my understanding such links aren't usable as sources. The interview has a large focus on the content rendered in the article for deletion, so it doesn't really hold that much weight as a source. [[User:Signpostmarv|Signpostmarv]] 04:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''delete''' rubbish like like shld be confined to the article on the game or whatever it is, if that is even notable <span style="background-color: #000000"> <font color="white">'''⇒'''</font> <font color="white">[[User:Bsnowball|bsnowball]]</font> </span> 10:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:40, 6 December 2006
- Second Life Liberation Army (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Not notable enough to deserve own article - admits only ten members.
- Delete --Quentin Smith 18:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. thadius856talk|airports|neutrality 19:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete it's a stub with nothing that satisfies WP:V. Signpostmarv 20:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --JudahBlaze 21:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Entertaining, but just not notable enough. AubreyEllenShomo 21:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not verifiable. JChap2007 00:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I'd suggest a move to SL History Wiki --RoninBKETC 01:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment -- Suggest hold for more research. Have found links, video footage, references from mainstream press e.g. New York Times, interviews, etc. Significant ramifications for future 3D worlds. 03:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) User:ScholarScola
- Response -- You found one link to a site which requires a log on. It is my understanding such links aren't usable as sources. The interview has a large focus on the content rendered in the article for deletion, so it doesn't really hold that much weight as a source. Signpostmarv 04:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- delete rubbish like like shld be confined to the article on the game or whatever it is, if that is even notable ⇒ bsnowball 10:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)