Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Fuentes: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
delete
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Delete''' - non notable per [[WP:BIO]] and the article doesn't even claim notability. [[User:Jayden54|Jayden54]] 21:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - non notable per [[WP:BIO]] and the article doesn't even claim notability. [[User:Jayden54|Jayden54]] 21:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' the subject wrote her own bio and not even well --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] 07:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' the subject wrote her own bio and not even well --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] 07:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' [[WP:COI]], autobiographical, is also a repost under [[Ana fuentes]], no assertion of notability fails [[WP:BIO]].--[[User:DakotaKahn|'''''Dakota''''']] 21:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:40, 26 December 2006

Ana Fuentes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

No valid claim for notability presented, and article is autobiographical. Speedy tag was objected to by User:Samir (The Scope), who recommended AfD, so here it is. I vote Delete. Danny Lilithborne 20:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]