Talk:Java ConcurrentMap

Requested move 23 May 2016

It has been proposed in this section that Java ConcurrentMap be renamed and moved to Java collections framework/ConcurrentMap.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Java ConcurrentMap → Java collections framework/ConcurrentMap – I'm not sure if sub-page syntax correct. Ushkin N (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Ushkin N (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Subpages should not be used to hold full articles. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well idea was to use "Java collections framewor" in the title, not to use sub-pages. Ushkin N (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ushkin N: Where did you mean to move it then? I see no reason to move this, though. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Anarchyte:, it seems no.

Well some wikis (outside Wikipedia) use sub-pages, to show a link with Java collections framework. Looks like this approach was never used in main namespace of the English Wikipedia. Ushkin N (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]