Luk

Barnstars and shiny stuff

This is temporary until I find a place to put these...

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting over a thousand of vandalism edits and keeping Wikipedia safe. Michaelas10 (T|C) 15:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I User:Chrislk02 award you this shiny anti vandalism barnstar for your defending of wikipedia articles, specificly but not limited to your reversions on the ACDC article! Keep up the good work! Chris Kreider - HFF 04:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I gotta give you another one for your fierce defenses of the younglife article! I am sure the vandals will just give up against you. Chris Kreider 17:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I award this barnstar to Lucasbfr for your help and assistance in getting the WikiProject user warnings to the review phase, and to let you know your work has been appreciated. Khukri (talk . contribs) 22:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks so much for The Working Man's Barnstar gift. It's nice to know my humble contributions are appreciated. Keep up the good work yourself! -- Satori Son 00:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Redirect

Hmm, did not expect a page so new to be already moved. Usually all pages on suspected copyright violations are too new for that. Tnx for the fix. Garion96 (talk) 16:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar

It comes at a funny moment, just when I am turning more towards working with people than with templates. But I still find it a good relaxation in between. Tell the truth, one reason why I'm working less on templates is that there are many templates I can't edit, such as {{tl}}, which means that I have to create forks like {{tltt|the same with a description}}. Is there anything that could be done about that? — Sebastian 21:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Appropriate language for Talk pages?

Luke, could you check out this exchange http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Raul_Hilberg (first section, Zundel trials)? Just see if the language is appropriate or too provocative. Sorry for bothering you with small stuff, probably it won't happen again when I get more familiar with wikipedia etiquette. I just want to avoid anything similar to flame wars around here.

Thanks.--Ninarosa 22:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page

I think it's time!

I will try to catch with you on IRC in the near future. I personally think you have the self-depreciatory attitude that is required in an admin, and the fact that you have turned this possible nomination down shows your true character. I fully respect your decision and if I can aid you in any way over the coming months please don't hesitate to give me a shout. I think you would make a stirling admin, and it's what the project needs. ^{Khukri -} 02:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Stupid Invaders.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stupid Invaders.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Studio 60 B-12.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Studio 60 B-12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

No Title

Bonjour! Je suis un élève de 1ere S et je vooulais vous demander si je pouvais vous prendre une partie de votre TPE sur les trous noirs (de votre site Luksbfr). Faisant moi meme un TPE sur les trous noirs cette année, j'aimerais vous emprunter la partie sur la détection des trous noirs. Bien sur vous serez citer dans notre "Bibliographie et Sitographie"! Merci de me répondre à l'adresse ***@***.***

Merci encore.

Replied by e-mail

Is there an email address that I can report abuse/ deletion of an article?

{{helpme}}

Yes hello,

Is there an email adress that I can send abuse claims/deletion requests of an article?

Thank you

Is there an email address that I can report abuse/ deletion of an article?

Thank you

70.245.143.216 20:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC) J040

Replied on this user's talk page

Help

Hey Lucas, Would you mind giving me a hand with the new overview page please? I'm busy as hell at the moment, and if I keep doing this bit by bit I'm never going to get ir done. If you can just add the obvious redirects, and note any that should become single issue templates, or any that need TfD'ing that would be great. Thanks a bunch. ^{Khukri -} 12:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

oh my God that's what I call a huuuge list... I'll give you a hand for sure :) (I am very busy at the moment too so I don't promise that will go fast) -- lucasbfr ^talk 17:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Location Maps

On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 7 Feb2007 20:22 (UTC)

openlearn

hi,

i've just put up the openlearn wiki entry and had a message that it is a copyright infringement. I just wanted to let you know that we own the copyright to the material. I work for the Open University and used some of our material to create the openlearn wiki entry.

Hope this is all OK! BEst, Stuart —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jinky32 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC). --Jinky32 12:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page

Resubmitted

Hi,

Ok, I've resubmitted the article. Hope it is Ok now. please let me know if not. Thanks for your help. Stuart--Jinky32 14:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

now that I have made changes whey is my page still not up?

I made the requested changes to the new philanthropy capital page last week. Is there a reason it is still not up?

Thankyou —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jtslough (talk • contribs) 15:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC).

What...?

During my edit a remark I did not intend was placed in the joost article. Don't know how!?! The remark was there in an earlier edit... I intended to edit the link to orkut. If I'm right about orkut please removed the link. If I'm wrong please explane the value of the link... I do not see the purpose of this link (other than advertisement for a not related product). I await your input on orkut. Thanks in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.173.106.75 (talk • contribs).

Replied on this user's talk page

About Asbimov

My user name is IAM and the messages on my computer say that I vandalized these pages. I would like to tell you that you made a mistake. I never even visited those pages before. Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IAM (talk • contribs).

Replied on this user's talk page

openlearn resubmission

hi! I resubmitted an openlearn entry a few days back to the temp account but it doesn't seem to have gone live yet. Can you advise if there's a problem with it? many thanks. Stuart--Jinky32 08:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page

openlearn

Thanks for coming back to me - my mistake - thought I had followed a link. Nevermind! Stuart--Jinky32 19:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

List of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip episodes

Not sure where to reply. I changed the two images because B12 wasn't appearing and Christmas I thought was too dark to be seen on some monitors. I have no emotional attachment to the versions I supplied. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Simonwright (talk • contribs) 11:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

Re : contested prod

Article restored as contested prod. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 20:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Rasmus Tenbergen

I got the permission to write used the materialfrom www.sammondano.org: Rasmus Tenbergen till mikael

visa detaljer 10:50 (8 timmar sedan) Dear Mikael,

that is a great idea to write a wikipedia article on the WPE (and an honor that you want to write one about me). You have of course the permission to use anything you want from the websites I contributed to (including Sammondano). If there is doubt you can also use everything from my other websites:

www.rasmus-tenbergen.de www.ifld.de www.world-parliament.org www.world-democracy.org

Thanks again and best wishes,

Rasmus

2007/2/16, Mikael Stenborg <[email protected]>: —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mikaelnordfors (talk • contribs) 19:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC).

On Bonney Eberndu

I've now expanded this article and made its assertion of notability clearer. I wasn't the original author and had never heard of him before the page came up for AfD, but anyone who had four separate articles on him in the UK press automatically passes WP:BIO, as it constitutes multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources. So are you now satisfied with the state of the article, or do you still believe it should be deleted? Walton monarchist89 15:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Muse

I believe the infromation is correct, even though I don'y have any web or book references.

I know this information is true due to myself being a student at Exeter College, where I have met various lecturers who taught Matt Bellamy whilst he was at Exeter College, there are also some of his original piano compositions that he wrote whilst taking a Music course here, available to view.

No Title

Delete a repeat post yes, but why take both of them off?

I don't think I deleted your link twice. Maybe an other editor did?

WP:RFCU and clerks

Greetings! A recent change has been made in the clerking system at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. There are no longer any obstacles to editors who wish to help out in this areas, as the standby list has now been deprecated. You were listed as a volunteer on the standby list before it was deprecated. If you are still interested in helping out in this area, please:

• Consider adding yourself to the list of active clerks at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Clerks.
• In helping, please make sure you follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Procedures as it is very important to the process there to follow these instructions for smooth operation.
• Please remember "Trust between the clerks and the checkusers is essential. Clerks who persistently make problematic comments on requests or otherwise violate decorum may be asked by the checkusers to cease contributing here."
• Add Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Clerks/Noticeboard to your watchlist to stay up to do date on the latest communications happening regarding this role.
• "Be aware that this position is rather dull and carries no particular prestige; status-seeking will not be looked upon kindly."

I am not involved with the checkuser system. I am acting only to inform you of this change. Thank you. --Durin 14:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

vacuum sewer page

Sorry my bad... Ive made a new page without any material from a website. I will request permission next time before using any copyrighted material. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Capeguy (talk • contribs) 20:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC).

Glasgow Patter

Any reason you reverted my edit only to revert yours? It was painfully obvious that my edit was correct and that there was nothing wrong with it. --Bloigen 18:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page

Re: 2007

I need to be heared out. Viacom suck. YouTube is a free video hosting site and now Viacom are suing them out of $1 billion. They suck! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YesMapRadio (talk • contribs) 19:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC).

Replied on this user's talk page

How do I cancel a checkuser?

I just want to know, how do you cancel a checkuser? Squirepants101 01:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page