Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabitha Kumari

Sabitha Kumari

Only blog references, which fail WP:RS. A google search on the name gives no non-blog hits. Soman (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sabitha Kumari is a Known Criminal and wanted in India —Preceding unsigned comment added by TigersRus (talk • contribs) 09:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More Refference have been provided from The News see links

I can provide more . I believe that should be enough.

Sabitha's empire has spread to one sixth of India's country's total districts it should be mentioned in the books. --99.238.6.68 (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article also has actual refferences. She is Indias Most Wanted --TigersRus (talk) 09:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- i can get more i believe that should be enough. More than Half of The Refferences are from The News sources --TigersRus (talk) 09:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I noticed that two of the blog posts had links to telegraph articles. However, those articles give little backing for any of the biographical info in the wikiarticle, they just state that there is a woman by this name, from andhra or jharkhand, in her 20s and have led maoist squad operations. Notability is a concern here. Is there any WP:RS on the claim that she's on 'Indias Most Wanted'? Any reputable source on her position in CPI(Maoist)? --Soman (talk) 09:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah and she is a Top Maoist. Look how many Pages are on her. --TigersRus (talk) 09:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sabitha Kumari is a Terrorist and she Leads a Maoist Army as well.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TigersRus (talk • contribs) 10:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Article has enough Refferences about her. --Thileepanmathivanan (talk) 10:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment and admin please note: Are you also using 99.238.6.68 to edit? Because you have both modified the above comment in the same way [1][2]. Please remember to log in when editing and do not edit an AfD discussion using both a username and an IP address. Thank you, cab (talk) 11:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 10:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ATTN I WOULD LIKE THIS ARTICLE TO BE JUDGED BY THE WIKI List of India-related deletion discussions List of India-related deletion discussions --99.238.6.68 (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I already added it to the list of discussions 15 minutes ago. The administrator who evaluates all the arguments at the end of the debate to determine consensus may ignore arguments which do not accord with policy, but otherwise, any person who sees this debate, and not just those from the deletion sorting list, may comment on it. Finally, please add new comments in the appropriate place and not at the top, and indent them using an appropriate number of * at the beginning of the line. Thank you, cab (talk) 11:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are indefinite amount of resources too many and i garuntee 100% these articles are going to expand.

User:Soman is just picking on articles i have created and nominating them for deletion and my articles are all information that are most upto date. I did nothing wrong i am just contributing like any other Wikipedian.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LTTE_and_Maoist_Relations

Keep-- Sabitha Kumari is a Legend --ThambeEeE (talk) 11:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Who says she is a legend? It's your own personal opinion. Salih (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, this is an obvious case of sockpuppeting. Four separate AfDs and disruptions of the process are discussed at ANI. --Soman (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject may be notable only in the Police department. Salih (talk) 13:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable Taprobanus (talk) 17:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, you would think that a kingpin of this nature would receive more substantial coverage. --Dhartung | Talk 19:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep and edit sharply per BLP. Remove the blogs, and keep only what is supported by the actual news accounts, which is not all that much, but i think enough for notability. and is there any actual evidence that the photograph actually shows her? DGG (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]