Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakaran/Wikipedian political entities
Useless, too cluttered, and nonsense. User:Pakaran didn't even make this page; it was made by an anon. I say delete! - 68.72.128.19 04:02, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment It could be that User:Pakaran was the anon. I'm not inclined to delete it until Pakaran denies (or confirms) this. - furrykef (Talk at me) 00:43, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - 68.23.46.106 20:13, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - 69.216.232.38 23:04, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - 68.72.113.117 21:09, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete This vfd was started on April, yet as May ends, no resolution has been decided upon. - 68.251.209.191 23:15, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't make that page. Anons have been making it based on some of my user subpages like User:Pakaran/Kingdom of Wikipedia but I wouldn't miss the page in question. Nor am I asking for it to be deleted; I basically don't care. Pakaran 11:05, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Abstain
Delete- 68.23.111.5 04:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) - Delete - 68.72.129.171 03:01, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - 68.255.37.206 00:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Normally I wouldn't vote to delete a userpage, but since Pakaran doesn't even care himself, there really isn't much point keeping it. Cyclone49 04:24, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- (Abstain) Comment: good grief. I've never seen so many anon votes. sockpuppet city. Kingdom of Wikipedia must be an IP shelter.~~~~ 07:09, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Have you ever poked an ants' nest with a stick and watched all the ants come scurrying out to see what the problem is? I wonder what the equivalent is for sockpuppets? -- Francs2000 | Talk File:Uk flag large.png 15:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - just a load of red links that the user admits to not creating, thus the "user-page sanctity" gentlemen's agreement of Wikipedia is null and void, imo -- Francs2000 | Talk File:Uk flag large.png 15:09, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- How about just redirecting it to User:Pakaran/Kingdom of Wikipedia ? --Irishpunktom\talk 20:31, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Strong delete. This is just a lot of made-up BS. Why are inclusionists "liberal" and deletionists "conservative"? Where did all these names come from anyway? Somebody must have just made them up. The last thing we need is another index of useless red-linked articles that will never be created. Binadot 21:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete pointless red-link farm. JamesBurns 07:52, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Radiant_>|< 12:31, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. What the heck are we losing? We could just as well title this page "List of political terms followed by 'of Wikipedia' just for the heck of it." Almafeta 02:51, 22 July 2005 (UTC)