This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JeLuF(talk | contribs) at 22:54, 18 September 2002(Congregationalist). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 22:54, 18 September 2002 by JeLuF(talk | contribs)(Congregationalist)
maveric149 May 9, 2002, because : discoherent and off topic
Eclecticology May 17, 2002, because : It could start with a definition
Gianfranco May 18, 2002, says "wait a minute" because : A "cache bug" was fixed to restore a version that tried to improve it.
RobLa May 25, 2002, because : This is not an accurate description of "politcal media". Do a Google search for "political media" to see common use. "Face The Nation" definitely qualifies as political media, but not under current Wikipedia definition. This page is more accruately titled "Government propaganda"
maveric149 June 15, 2002, because : It's a mixture of several different articles, intermixed with nonsense
GWO -- very short, and pretty low quality. Wholly unimformative.
I've put in his leadership dates, corrected the detail about who followed him (no-one remembers John Smith). It's not fixed, but it's a tad better. Tarquin June 9 2002
The Anome May 27, 2002, because : DV and digital video in general have been conflated in this article
Koyaanis Qatsi July 13, 2002, because : I think the DV/MiniDV problem could be fixed easily enough by adding info on other digital video formats--unfortunately I wrote this article before I knew much about them, and still know basically nothing about them.
Daniel C. Boyer June 6, 2002, because : Needs massive expansion and besides just going through the history of painting should mention anti-painting tendencies such as Miro's "murder of painting" and the advent of conceptual art, &c.
Daniel C. Boyer June 6, 2002, because : This whole article reads as if it is from an FBI brochure! Shouldn't there be a more NPOV presentation of criticisms and accolades, the views of critics and defenders?
maveric149 June 15, 2002, because : This material is more wikified than the material on the subpages and is slightly different. This poses a version control issue that needs to be resolved.
Daniel C. Boyer June 17, 2002, because First the phenomenon or alleged phenomenon should be described, i.e. what is different about the "Black Helicopter" than any old black helicopter (i.e. that people claim to see them without running lights, or large formations of them, or at a lower than usual altitude, or in places one would not typically expect to see a black helicopter, or the helicopters look different than usually-seen helicopters, or whatever the claim is), and then the [alleged] significance and the different theories about them laid out. Not very precise the way it is.
Toby Bartels June 21, 2002, because : Little more than a dictionary definition now. Needs history of the concept in folklore -- Tolkien is just a small part of this.
Daniel C. Boyer June 27, 2002, because : Very far from complete; should mention imperialism more in sense of practice and imperialism as used in Marxist-Leninist theory
Karen Johnson July 6, 2002, because : All of the subpages of 'sighthound' need to be either extended or removed - they contain no information at present.
JeLuF 15:51 Aug 3, 2002 (PDT), because: old atomic model (ca 1910), not mentioning suborbitals, influence of electron configuration on behaviour of atoms (valence), ...
