Copyedit
This article needs a full copyedit, with restructuring (to have more than 1 section) and a fair share of grammar/spelling fixes. Jdorje 22:06, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm in the process of fixing grammar/spelling/other issues. -- RattleMan 05:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah: also, the majority of the impact section seems to be stolen from the Times Dispatch. In my estimation it would be best to delete the whole impact section and rewrite it from scratch. Basically, none of the writings by this user can be trusted. Jdorje 05:46, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Good point about this user, and hopefully rebuild it. Hurricanehink 14:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- cited some of the information that if forgot to cite when I wrote the article Storm05 18:11, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- I was actually impressed with how extensive this article is. Is a copyedit really nessisary? Perhaps I read it after changes were made but I think that the article is great. Some of the sections could use to be expanded, but other than that, it's a pretty solid article. I'm removing the cleanup notice. -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 03:40, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Just as an example, the intro does not give the year/season, or the month/date, or link to tropical cyclone. The rest of the writing is...passable. Jdorje 03:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- There are a fair number of misspellings and grammatical errors. A lot of the text seems like "spaghetti" in that it is just a disconnected list of facts with little overall narrative thread. Metric units are not widely included. Inline references should be included (via <ref> and <reference/>). Jdorje 00:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- I did a copy edit on this article and im suggesting to upgadge it to B-Class if thats okay. Storm05 19:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- There are a fair number of misspellings and grammatical errors. A lot of the text seems like "spaghetti" in that it is just a disconnected list of facts with little overall narrative thread. Metric units are not widely included. Inline references should be included (via <ref> and <reference/>). Jdorje 00:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- The intro is too short and contains misspellings. — jdorje (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- There are also numerous spelling and tense problems throughout the article. — jdorje (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- This article is nearing B Class, because I added more pictures Storm05 18:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Whoops!
Must've forgot to cite the information in the Impact section. Storm05 17:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)