Wikipedia:Pages needing attention

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mav (talk | contribs) at 23:00, 7 April 2002 (+ Military fiat to 24's list). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Of course, every entry on Wikipedia deserves attention. But some entries deserve tender loving attention.

If you come across a page that you think needs a lot of work, but have no idea how to approach it, list it here so that others can find it.

This page is very similar to the other pages like: Requested articles, Current events. However it is more utilitarian than those pages, being intended for the editorial community alone.

Articles that have good information, but need work for some reason


Articles that seem to be nothing more than definitions

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and an article which simply defines a word is useless. Sometimes, those articles can turn into bona fide encyclopedic treatments of a topic; sometimes they should just be deleted.

See also Wikipedia utilities/find or fix a stub.


Articles containing outdated text

The following articles were drawn from out-of-date public domain texts, such as the 1911 Encyclopedia Anglicana, the 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia, or the 1881 Household Cyclopedia. Or, they may contain large sections drawn from such texts. In any event, they require fact-checking, modernization, and deletion of anachronisms. (This may be the best way to deal with the flood of dubious material from 62.98. It's a lot more constructive than flame wars.)

Abgar -- Club

  • More articles by 62.98.xx.xx containg Household Cyclopedia material. Added to previously existing articles. Dog -- Rowing

Articles of dubious merit, accuracy and/or validity


The following articles are by an author who does not tend to follow the consensus NPOV - rather, he/she has their own concept of wikipedia:Natural point of view. All these articles, and other works by this author, need close attention and review to place them in an NPOV format. Although they have not created a login, more pages by this author can be found at special:contributions&theuser=24.150.61.63.

The user has also been using the main page at meta.wikipedia.com to draw attention to his views and agenda. It is perfectly legitimate to air personal views about Wikipedia on meta - that is what it's there for. However, the main page is there chiefly as a contents page to the articles on meta, not to advertise particular ideas.

See also Wikipedia utilities/Page titles to be deleted


Other Wikipedia Utilities



See also : Wikipedia utilities