Talk:Java code coverage tools

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ThurnerRupert (talk | contribs) at 02:23, 2 March 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 12 years ago by ThurnerRupert

notable because:

--ThurnerRupert (talk) 10:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

None of those reasons count towards WP:NSOFT. I've nominated the article for deletion via AfD. Jarkeld (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
you want to nominate the other tools as well, like emma, clover, and cobertura? or you are happy with the notability? --ThurnerRupert (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Haven't looked at them yet, perhaps in the near future. Jarkeld (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
it stands out of the crowd in two aspects. only bytecode one (amongst cobertura, emma) supporting java 7. only one supporting online instrumentation and collection and merge of the results (amongst cobertura, emma, clover). --ThurnerRupert (talk) 02:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

As per recommendation on WP:NSOFT - simple search of "EclEmma" on Google books will give a lot of books, which mention EclEmma and thus JaCoCo. Such well known books as "Java Power Tools" doesn't count as well? Mandrikov (talk) 01:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply