Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wotch

keep of course its notable

The Wotch

Non-notable and moderately popular webcomic. Jake013 22:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating articles Anne Onymous and Robin Ericson as unnecessary non-notable fancruft. Jake013 22:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and merge teh characters into this artilce. Seems moderately popular enough for inclusion--Nick Y. 22:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 22:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC) [reply]
Speedy Keep ~~I'm having a little trouble assuming good faith on this one.~~ I do not believe this is a good faith nomination. The nominator has a history of questionable AfDs. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 23:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The articles for the two authors should be merged into The Wotch. . –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 18:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Pretty well known webcomic NawlinWiki 23:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Abe Dahiell. Silensor 23:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the whole point of wikipedia, to my mind, is that it can have articles on things a regular encyclopedia couldn't. This is a reasonably good article on a fairly well known webcomic, and does not meet any of the criteria for being deleted as far as I can tell. I wouldn't object to a merge of the other two articles into the main Wotch article. --Tim 00:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: any webcomic that gets a spinoff and a video game is definitely notable. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Anne Onymous and Robin Ericson to The Wotch at the least. Could somebody who has suggested we keep The Wotch point to how this article meets WP:WEB? The only thing in the article that sounds close to an indicator of notability is "Multiple Members of the Wotch Forums ... are working on a Wotch Game Boy Advance video game." It doesn't sound like this game is from a major company, let alone even produced. -- Dragonfiend 14:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Get rid of the contentless character articles - I redirected them ages ago, but was reverted. Bleh. - Hahnch e n 17:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Anne Onymous and Robin Ericson to The Wotch and weak delete per Dragonfiend. Chosen One 18:34, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the minor articles, and no vote on the main article. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 23:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP it's non-notable to YOU.\/—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.255.245.46 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Nothing wrong with this. Factitious 23:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Anne Onymous and Robin Ericson to The Wotch and keep The Wotch. The comic has a significant following, is discussed on occasion by commentators to online webcomic review websites and blogs, and has spawned multiple spinoff and crossover comics. The separate entries add no information not present in the main entry (and in fact perpetuate a bit of error), but the webcomic itself is noted and notable. Redneckgaijin 01:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all useless articles. Includes The Wotch; as Dragonfriend says, the only indicator of notability is the video game, which is being produced by Wotch readers and not any major company. Maybe we should delete that too for non-notability? Don Diego ^(Talk) 11:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Wotch, Merge Anne Onymous and Robin Ericson to The Wotch, per Redneckgaijin. JQF 13:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, what you're going to delete all not-available-in-print webcomics or something? Merge Anne Onymous and Robin Ericson to The Wotch. GracieLizzie 17:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just those that aren't notable. Don Diego ^(Talk) 17:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]