The area known as the Democratic Republic of the Congo was populated as early as 10,000 years ago and settled in the 7th and 8th centuries A.D. by Bantus from present-day Nigeria.
European exploration
The Congo was the last part of the African continent to yield to European explorers. One by one the other great mysteries of African exploration had been traversed by determined men: the coasts to Prince Henry the Navigator's Portuguese sailors in the 15th Century; the Blue Nile to Bruce in 1773; the remote upper Niger to Mungo Park in 1796; the vast Sahara to competitors Laing, Callie, and Clapperton in the 1820s; the fever-ridden mangroves of the lower Niger to the Lander Brothers in 1830, southern Africa and the Zambezi to Livingstone in the 1850s; the fabled upper Nile to Burton, Speke and Baker in a succession of expeditions between 1857 and 1868. The Congo, however, though it had been one of the first to be attempted, remained a mystery.
For over 400 years European explorers had sailed into the broad Congo estuary, planning to fight their way up the falls and rapids that begin only 100 miles inland, and then travel up the river to its unknown source. All failed. The rapids and falls, had they known it, extended for 220 miles inland, and the terrain close by the river is impassable even today. Repeated attempts to travel overland were repulsed with heavy casualties: accident, conflict with natives, and above all disease saw large and well-equipped expeditions get no further than 40 miles or so past the last rapid, the legendary 'Cauldron of Hell '.
It wasn't until the late 1870s that the Congo was explored, and even then it was not from the sea, but from the other side of the continent. Setting out from Zanzibar, the journalist Henry Morton Stanley aimed to find Dr Livingstone, who had not been heard of in several years and was, in fact, exploring the upper reaches of a great navigable inland river called the Lualuba, which Livingstone hoped was connected to the Nile, but which in fact turned out to be the Congo. After leaving Livingstone, Stanley sailed for 1000 miles down the Lualuba/Congo to Stanley Pool, and then, rather than perish in the impenetrable country of the cascades, took a wide detour overland to come within striking distance of the Portuguese trading station at Boma on the Congo estuary.
Prelude to conquest
When Stanley returned to Europe in 1878, he had not only found Dr Livingstone (which is remembered to this day), ruined his health, and resolved the last great mystery of African exploration, but also opened the heart of tropical Africa up to the outside world. This was to be his most enduring legacy. Stanley was lionised all over Europe. He wrote articles, appeared at public meetings, lobbied the rich and powerful tirelessly, and always his theme was the boundless opportunity for commercial exploitation of the lands he had discovered; or, in his own words, to "pour the civilisation of Europe into the barbarism of Africa".
"There are 40,000,000 of naked people" on the other side of the rapids, Stanley wrote, "and the cotton-spinners of Manchester are waiting to clothe them... Birmingham's factories are glowing with the red metal that shall presently be made into ironwork in every fashion and shape for them ... and the ministers of Christ are zealous to bring them, the poor benighted heathen, into the Christian fold."
Europe, however, was less than keen on the idea: the great European scramble for Africa had not yet begun. Outside of the Cape and the Mediterranean coast, Europe had no colonies of any significance in Africa - the focus of the great powers was still firmly on the lands that had made Europe's fortune: the Americas, the East Indies, India, China, and Australasia. There seemed no economic sense to investing energy in Africa when the returns from other colonies were likely to be both richer and more immediate. Nor was there a strong humanitarian interest in the continent now that the American slave trade had been extinguished. Stanley was applauded, admired, decorated - and ignored.
It is at this point that King Leopold II of Belgium took a part. In his history of the Congo, Peter Forbath describes Leopold succinctly. He was:
- a tall, imposing man ... enjoying a reputation for hedonistic sensuality, cunning intelligence (his father once described him as subtle and sly as a fox), overweaning ambition, and personal ruthlessness. He was, nevertheless, an extremely minor monarch in the realpolitik of the times, ruling a totally insignificant nation, a nation in fact that had come into existence barely four decades before and lived under the constant threat of losing its precarious independence to the great European powers around it. He was a figure who, one might have had every reason to expect, would devote himself to maintaining his country' s strict neutrality, avoiding giving offense to any of his powerful neighbours, and indulging his keenly developed tastes for the pleasures of the flesh, rather than one who would make a profound impact on history. Yet, in the most astonishing and improbable way imaginable, he managed virtually single-handedly to upset the balance of power in Africa and usher in the terrible age of European colonialism on the black continent.
Leopold was a constitutional monarch charged with the usual constitutional duties of opening parliaments, greeting diplomats, and attending state funerals. He had no power to decide policy. But for over 20 years he had been agitating for Belgium to take its place among the great colonial powers of Europe. "Our frontiers can never be extended into Europe", he wrote, " since history teaches that colonies are useful, that they play a great part in that which makes up the power and prosperity of states, let us strive to get one in our turn." At various times, he launched unsuccessful schemes to buy an Argentine province, to buy Borneo from the Dutch, rent the Philippines from Spain, or establish colonies in China, Vietnam, Japan, or the Pacific islands. When the 1860s explorers focussed attention on Africa, he schemed to colonise Mozambique on the east coast, Senegal on the west coast, and the Congo in the centre. None of these schemes came anywhere near fruition: the government of Belgium resolutely resisted all Leopold's suggestions, seeing the acquisition of a colony as a good way to spend large amounts of money for little or no return.
Leopold's eventual response was breath-taking in its hubris and simplicity: if the government of Belgium would not take a colony, then he would simply do it himself - acting in his private capacity as an ordinary citizen. The way in which he went about this fully justified his late father's assessment of his character. In 1876 Leopold sponsored an international geographical conference in Brussels, inviting delegates from scientific societies all over Europe, to discuss philanthropic and scientific matters such as the best way to coordinate map making, keep watch over the newly-eradicated west coast slave trade, and investigate ways of sending medical aid to Africa. It was a sham: at the close of the conference, Leopold proposed that they set up a international benevolent committee to carry on, and modestly agreed to accept the chairman's role. For the look of things, he held one more meeting the following year, but from that time on, the Association Internationale Africaine was simply a front for Leopold's ambition. He created a baffling series of subsidiary shell organisations, culminating in the cunningly named Association Internationale du Congo which had a single shareholder: Leopold himself.
Soon after Stanley returned from the Congo, Leopold tried to recruit him. Stanley, still hopeful for British backing, brushed him off. Leopold persisted and eventually Stanley gave in. Leopold, it seemed, was the only European willing to finance Stanley's dream: the building of a railway over the Crystal Mountains from the sea to Stanley Pool, from where river steamers could reach 1000 miles into the heart of Africa. Stanley, much more familiar with the rigours of the African climate and the complexities of local politics than Leopold, persuaded his patron that the first step should be the construction of a wagon trail and a series of forts. Leopold agreed and in deepest secrecy, Stanley signed a five year contract at a salary of a thousand pounds a year, and set off to Zanzibar under an assumed name. To avoid discovery, materials and workers were shipped in by various roundabout routes, and communications between Stanley and Leopold were entrusted to a Colonel Maximilian Strauch. It was only at this point that Stanley was informed of the magnitude of Leopold's ambition: he was not merely to construct a series of trading stations, he was to secretly carve out an entire nation. His instructions were direct and to the point: "It is a question of creating a new State, as big as possible, and of running it. It is clearly understood that in this project there is no question of granting the slightest political power to the negros. That would be absurd."
Stanley seemed to find nothing unusual or reprehensible about this, and set about his task with a will. For all his social shortcomings in European society, he was undoubtedly the right man for the job. Within three years his phenomenal capacity for hard work, his skill at playing one social group off against another, his ruthless use of modern weaponry to kill opponents, and above all his relentless determination had opened the route to the upper Congo. In later years Stanley would write that the most vexing part of his duties was not the work itself, nor negotiating with the natives, but keeping order amongst the ill-assorted collection of white men he had brought with him as overseers, who squabbled constantly over small matters of rank or status. "Almost all of them", he wrote, "clamoured for expenses of all kinds, which included ... wine, tobacco, cigars, clothes, shoes, board and lodging, and certain nameless extravagances" (by which he meant attractive slaves to warm their beds). Stanley was exhausted and returned to Europe, only to be sent straight back by Leopold, who promised him an outstanding assistant: 'Chinese' Gordon (who did not in fact take up Leopold's offer but chose instead to go to meet his fate at Khartoum). "It is indispensable", instructed Leopold, "that you should purchase for the Comite d Etudes (i.e., Leopold himself) as much land as you can obtain".
Having established a beachhead on the lower Congo, in 1883 Stanley set out upriver to extend Leopold's domain, employing his usual methods: negotiations with local chiefs buying sovereignty in exchange for bolts of cloth and trinkets; playing one tribe off another, and if need be, simply shooting an obstructive chief and negotiating with his cowed successor instead. However, as he approached Stanley Falls at the junction between the Congo proper and the Lualuba (close to the general vicinity of Central Africa where he had found Livingstone six years before), it soon became clear that Stanley's men were not the only intruders.
Tippoo Tib, last and greatest of the Arab slave traders of the 19th Century, was well-known to Stanley, as was the social chaos and devastation that slave-hunting brought. It had only been through Tippoo Tib's help that Stanley had found Livingstone (who himself had survived years on the Lualuba by virtue of Tippoo Tib's friendship). Now, Stanley discovered, Tippoo Tib's men had reached still further west in search of fresh populations to enslave. Six years before, the Arabs had thought the Congo deadly and impassable, and warned Stanley not to attempt to go there, but when Tippoo Tib learned in Zanzibar that Stanley had survived, he was quick to act. Villages everywhere had been burned and depopulated, bodies floated down the river. Tippoo Tib had raided 118 villages, killed 4000 Africans, and, when Stanley reached his camp, has 2300 slaves, mostly young women and children, in chains ready to transport half-way across the continent to the markets of Zanzibar. Having found the new ruler of the upper Congo, Stanley calmly negotiated an agreement to allow him to build his final river station just below the Stanley Falls, which prevented vessels sailing further upstream.
The genesis of the Congo Free State
At the end of his physical resources, Stanley returned home, to be replaced by a Lieutenant Colonel Francis de Winton, formerly of the Belgian Army. In Europe, Leopold's intrigues began to bear fruit. Where he had gained ownership of the Congo largely through the disinterest of the major powers, now he would confirm and strengthen it because of their interest. In the few years since the establishment of the Congo venture, the mood in Europe had shifted decisively, and the struggle for Africa was about to begin in earnest. Leopold's activities in the Congo had already pushed the French into claiming an area on the north shore (the modern Republic of the Congo, with its capital, Brazzaville, on the northern shore of Stanley Pool). While no-one (bar Leopold) particularly wanted such economically unpromising colonies, the other European powers were not prepared to stand idly by and see land snapped up by rivals.
In an astonishingly devious succession of negotiations, Leopold, in his capacity as chairman of the purely humanitarian and disinterested Association Internationale Africaine, played one off against the other. Britain was uneasy at French expansion and had a technical claim on the Congo via Lt. Cameron's 1973 expedition from Zanzibar to bring home Livingstone's body, but was reluctant to take on yet another expensive, unproductive colony. Portugal had a much older claim, dating back to Diego Cao's discovery of the mouth of the river in 1482 and, having ignored it for centuries, were stimulated into remembering it. Portugal flirted with the French at first, but the English offered to support Portugal's claim to the entire Congo in return for a free trade agreement. For the English, the free trade was an important minor issue: the real benefit was frustration of the French. Next Bismarck entered the fray on behalf of Germany: with vast new holdings in South-West Africa already, he had no desire for the Congo, but every intention of seeing that it did not go to either England or France.
At this point Leopold acted. He began a publicity campaign in England, harping on Portugal's dreadful slavery record, and quietly let English merchant houses know that he would, if given formal control of the Congo, give them the same "most favoured nation" status that Portugal offered. At the same time, Leopold promised Bismark that he would not give any one nation special status, and that German traders would be as welcome as any other. Then Leopold offered France the support of the Association for French ownership of the entire northern bank, and sweetened the deal by proposing that, if his personal wealth proved insufficient to hold the entire Congo (as seemed utterly inevitable), that it should revert to France. Finally, he enlisted the aid of the United States, sending President Arthur carefully edited copies of the cloth-and-trinket treaties Stanley had extracted from various local chiefs, and proposing that, as an entirely disinterested humanitarian body, the Association would administer the Congo for the good of all, handing over power to the locals as soon as they were ready for the grave responsibility. This was the master stroke. In November 1884 Bismark convened a 14-nation conference to find a peaceful resolution to the Congo crisis, and after three months of negotiation, Leopold emerged triumphant: France was given 257,000 square miles on the north bank (modern Congo-Brazzaville and the Central African Republic), Portugal 351,000 square miles to the south (modern Angola), and Leopold's wholly-owned, single-shareholder philanthropic organisation received the balance: 905,000 square miles, to be constituted as the Congo Free State. In a dazzling display of diplomatic virtuosity, Leopold had had the conference agree not to a transfer of the Congo to one of his many philanthropic shell organisations, nor even to his care in his capacity as King of the Belgians, but simply to himself. He became sole ruler of 30 million people, without constitution, without international supervision, without ever having been to the Congo, and without more than a tiny handful of his citizens having heard of him.
Leopold's conquest
Leopold no longer needed the facade of the Association Internationale du Congo, and replaced it with a an appointed 'cabinet' of Belgians who would do his bidding. To the temporary new capital of Boma, he sent a Governor-General and a chief of police. The vast Congo basin was split up into 14 administrative districts, each district into zones, each zone into sectors, and each sector into posts. From the District Commissioners down to post level, every appointed head was European: mercenaries, soldiers of fortune, adventurers of every kind. Three main problems presented themselves over the next few years. First, bar Stanley's eight trading stations, the rest of the country was unmapped jungle, and offered no commercial return. Second, Cecil Rhodes, then Prime Minister of the British Cape Colony (modern South Africa was expanding from the south and threatening to occupy the southern Lualuba area in defiance of the the Berlin Treaty and with the tacit connivance of London. Third, Tippoo Tib's slaving gangs had established a strong presence in the north and east of the country and the area to the east (modern Uganda, and had effectively become an independent country.
Leopold was one of the richest men in Europe, but not even he could afford to keep up with his expenses. He needed to extract riches from the Congo, not expend them. In flagrant violation of his mandate, he set out to do just that, and set in train the most brutal colonial regime in modern history. The first change was the introduction of terres vacantes - "vacant" land, which was anything that no-one was actually living on. This was deemed to belong to the state, and servants of the state (i.e., any white man in Leopold's employ) were encouraged to exploit it. Next, the Free State was divided into two economic zones: the Free Trade Zone was open to entrepreneurs of any nation, who were allowed to buy 10 and 15-year monopoly leases on anything of value: ivory from a particular district, or the rubber concession, for example. The other zone - almost two-thirds of the Congo - became the Domaine Prive: the exclusive private property of the State, which was in turn the exclusive private property of King Leopold.
On this basis, the Congo became financially self-sufficient. It was not sufficient for Leopold's boundless greed, however. In 1893 he excised the most readily accessible 100,000 square mile portion of the Free Trade Zone and declared it to be the Domaine de la Couronne: here the same rules applied as in the Domaine Prive, except that all revenue went directly to Leopold in person. No-one knows how much Leopold made from the Congo Free State, but it was certainly many tens of millions (and this in a time when even one million was a massive fortune), and vastly more than even Leopold could spend.
Early in his rule, the second problem - British expansionism into the southern part of the Congo Basin - was addressed. The vulnerable and distant district of Katanga on the upper Lualuba was occupied by a powerful chief named Msiri who had already rejected overtures from Rhodes: Leopold did not trouble to negotiate, he sent well-armed military expeditions to occupy the capital. Msiri retreated into the forest, was captured, and still refused to give up his sovereignty. On Leopold's orders, a Free Stare officer shot Msiri, and the replacement chief proved to be more amenable.
In the short term, the third problem, that of the Arab slavers, was simply solved: Leopold negotiated an alliance, and later appointed Tippoo Tib as governor of the Stanley Falls district. In the longer term, this was unsatisfactory. At home, Leopold found it embarrassing to be allied with the last slaver in the world of any consequence and, worse, Tippoo Tib and Leopold were direct commercial rivals: every slave that Tippoo Tib extracted from his realm, every pound of ivory, was a loss to Leopold. War was inevitable. Both sides fought by proxy, arming and leading the cannibal tribes of the Lualuba forest in a conflict of unparalleled ferocity. They believed that suffering tenderised the meat, and prisoners were prepared for the pot still living; nor was it just the native tribesman who indulged: European officers too ate human flesh. Tippoo Tib's muskets were no match for Leopold's artillery and machine guns, however, and by early 1894 the war was over.
Changes in Congolese Society (brief overview)
At the time the multinational concessionary companies under Leopold's auspices and the Congolese had two very different concepts of land and labor. Understanding the contrasting patters of production between the traditional Congolese tribal states and modern, industrial Belgium is essential.
Capitalism, an economic system in which capital, or wealth, is put to work to produce more capital, revolutionized the region's traditional economies, inducing social changes and political consequences that revolutionized Congolese society to this day.
Balanced, subsistence-based economies shifted to specialization and accumulation of surpluses. These changes revolutionized production patterns because maximizing production and minimizing cost (the specialization of capitalist production) did not necessarily coincide with traditional, seasonal patterns of agricultural production. Rather than specializing in a particular product according to the concept of comparative advantage, and then mass-producing surplus values of this product (rubber) for profit, traditional Congolese tribal states in the past favored balanced, self-reliant, subsistence economies, and hence followed labor patterns that reflected seasonal cycles.
Tribal states or empires organized along precarious, unwritten cultural traditions also shifted to a division of labor based on legal protection of land and labor—once inalienable, but now commodities to be bought, sold, or traded.
The bourgeois ethic wage of wage/labor productivity was thus, in many respects, a new concept to supposedly ‘idle’ natives merely accustomed to older patterns of production.
On that not, it must be noted that the integration of traditional economies in Congo within the framework of the modern, capitalist economy was also particularly exploitative. The fortunes of King Leopold II, for instance, the famed philanthropist, abolitionist, and self-anointed sovereign of Congo Free State (1885)—76 times larger geographically than Belgium itself—and those of the multinational concessionary companies under his auspices, were mainly made on the proceeds of Congolese rubber, which had historically never been mass-produced in surplus quantities. Between 1880 and 1920 the population of Congo thus halved; over 10 million ‘indolent natives’ unaccustomed to the bourgeois ethos of labor productivity, were the victims of murder, starvation, exhaustion induced by over-work, and disease.
After all, mass-production of rubber in a dense, tropical forest in one of the world’s most isolated regions was after all quite a massive endeavor. Other parts of Africa were not cultivating rubber (quite a harsh crop to cultivate); other parts of Africa had milder climates and topographies.
Leopold’s fortunes, ploughed back into monumental buildings in Brussels were made mainly on the proceeds of Congolese rubber.
Leopold's rule
Meanwhile, the quest for income was unrelenting. District official's salaries were reduced to a bare minimum, and made up with a commission payment based on the profit that their area returned to Leopold. Native communities in the Domaine Prive were not merely forbidden by law to sell items to anyone bar the State, they were required to provide State officials with set quota of rubber and of ivory, at a fixed, government-mandated price, to provide food to the local post, and to provide 10% of their number as full-time forced labourers - slaves in all but name - and another 25% part-time.
To enforce the rubber quotas, the Force Publique was called in: nominally policemen; most were cannibals from the Lualuba. Armed with modern weapons and the chicotte - a bull whip made of hippopotamus hide - the Force Publique routinely took and tortured hostages (mostly women), flogged, raped, burned recalcitrant villages, and above all, took human hands as trophies to show that, even though the rubber quota had still not been met, it was not through want of trying. One junior white officer described a raid to punish a village that had protested. The white officer in command: "ordered us to cut off the heads of the men and hang them on the village palisades, also their sexual members, and to hang the women and the children on the palisade in he form of a cross." After seeing a native killed for the first time, a Danish missionary wrote: "The soldier said 'Don't take this to heart so much. They kill us if we don't bring the rubber. The Commissioner has promised us if we have plenty of hands he will shorten our service". In Forbath's words again:
- The baskets of severed hands, set down at the feet of the European post commanders, became the symbol of the Congo Free State. ... The collection of hands became an end in itself. Force Publique soldiers brought them to the stations in place of rubber; they even went out to harvest them instead of rubber ...... They became a sort of currency. They came to be used to make up for shortfalls in rubber quotas, to replace ... the the people who were demanded for the forced labour gangs; and the Force Publique soldiers were paid their bonuses on the basis of how many hands they collected.
In theory, each right hand proved a judicial murder. In practice, soldiers sometimes cheated by simply cutting off the hand and leaving the victim to live or die. More than a few survivors later said that they had lived through a massacre by acting dead, not moving even when their hand was severed, and waiting till the soldiers left before seeking help.
Estimates of the total death toll vary considerably. British diplomat Roger Casement's famous 1904 report set it at 3 million for just twelve of the twenty years Leopold's regime lasted; Forbath, at least 5 million; Adam Hochschild, 10 million; the Encyclopedia Britannica gives a total population decline from 20 or 30 million to 8 million.
The end of the Congo Free State
So far as possible, visitors to the country were barred. Missionaries were allowed only on sufferance, and mostly only if they were Belgian Catholics that Leopold could keep quiet. White employees were forbidden to leave the country. Nevertheless, rumours circulated and Leopold ran an enormous publicity campaign to discredit them, even creating a bogus Commission for the Protection of the Natives to root out the "few isolated instances" of abuse. Publishers were bribed, critics accused of running ulterior campaigns to further other nations' colonial ambitions, eyewitness reports from missionaries dismissed as attempts by Protestants to smear honest Catholic priests. And for a decade or more, Leopold was successful: the secret was out but few believed it.
Eventually, the most telling blows came from a most unexpected source. Clerks in major London shipping offices began to wonder why the ships that brought vast loads of rubber from the Congo returned empty of all but guns and ammunition for the Force Publique'. Edmund Morel was the most famous of these: he became a full-time investigative journalist , and then (aided by merchants who wanted to break into Leopold's monopoly), a publisher. In 1902 Joseph Conrad's novel Heart of Darkness was released: based on his brief experience as a steamer captain on the Congo ten years before, it encapsulated the public's growing fears, and in 1904, Sir Roger Casement, then the British Consul, delivered a long, detailed eyewitness report which was made public. The British Congo Reform Association, founded by Morel, demanded action. Other European nations followed suit, as did the USA, and the British Parliament demanded a meeting of the 14 signatory powers to review the 1885 Berlin Agreement. The Belgian Parliament forced Leopold to set up an independent commission of enquiry, and despite the King's desperate efforts, in 1905 it confirmed Casement's report in every damning detail.
Leopold offered to reform his regime, but few took him seriously. All nations were now agreed that the King's rule must be ended as soon as possible, but no nation was willing to take on the responsibility, and never once was it suggested that that the land might be simply given back to its rightful owners. Belgium was the obvious European candidate to run the Congo, but the Belgians were still unwilling. For two years Belgium debated the question and held fresh elections on the issue; meanwhile Leopold made the most of his last opportunity and - incredibly - enlarged the Domaine de la Couronne so as to milk the last possible ounce of personal profit while he could. Finally, on November 15th 1908, four years after the Casement Report and six years after Heart of Darkness was first printed, the Parliament of Belgium annexed the Congo Free State and took over its administration.
The Belgian Congo
(Account of the period 1908 to 1960 goes here)
The Democratic Republic of the Congo
Following a series of riots and unrest, the Belgian Congo was granted its independence on June 30, 1960. Parliamentary elections in 1960 produced Patrice Lumumba as prime minister and Joseph Kasavubu as president of the renamed Democratic Republic of the Congo.
During the first year of independence, several events destabilized the country: the army mutinied; the governor of Katanga province attempted secession; a UN peacekeeping force was called in to restore order; Prime Minister Lumumba died under mysterious circumstances; and Col. Joseph Mobutu (later Mobutu Sese Seko) took over the government and ceded it again to President Kasavubu.
Unrest and rebellion plagued the government until 1965, when Lieutenant General Mobutu, by then commander in chief of the national army, again seized control of the country and declared himself president for 5 years. Mobutu quickly centralized power into his own hands and was elected unopposed as president in 1970. Embarking on a campaign of cultural awareness, Mobutu renamed the country the Republic of Zaire and required citizens to adopt African names. Relative peace and stability prevailed until 1977 and 1978 when Katangan rebels, based in Angola, launched a series of invasions into the Katanga region. The rebels were driven out with the aid of Belgian paratroopers.
During the 1980s, Mobutu continued to enforce his one-party system of rule. Although Mobutu successfully maintained control during this period, opposition parties, most notably the Union pour la Democratie et le Progres Social (UDPS), were active. Mobutu's attempts to quell these groups drew significant international criticism.
As the Cold War came to a close, internal and external pressures on Mobutu increased. In late 1989 and early 1990, Mobutu was weakened by a series of domestic protests, by heightened international criticism of his regime's human rights practices, and by a faltering economy. In May 1990 Mobutu agreed to the principle of a multi-party system with elections and a constitution. As details of a reform package were delayed, soldiers in September 1991 began looting Kinshasa to protest their unpaid wages. Two thousand French and Belgian troops, some of whom were flown in on U.S. Air Force planes, arrived to evacuate the 20,000 endangered foreign nationals in Kinshasa.
In 1992, after previous similar attempts, the long-promised Sovereign National Conference was staged, encompassing over 2,000 representatives from various political parties. The conference gave itself a legislative mandate and elected Archbishop Laurent Monsengwo as its chairman, along with Etienne Tshisekedi, leader of the UDPS, as prime minister. By the end of the year Mobutu had created a rival government with its own prime minister. The ensuing stalemate produced a compromise merger of the two governments into the High Council of Republic-Parliament of Transition (HCR-PT) in 1994, with Mobutu as head of state and Kengo Wa Dondo as prime minister. Although presidential and legislative elections were scheduled repeatedly over the next 2 years, they never took place.
By 1996, tensions from the neighboring Rwanda war had spilled over to Zaire. Rwandan Hutu militia forces (Interahamwe), who had fled Rwanda following the ascension of a Tutsi-led government, had been using Hutu refugees camps in eastern Zaire as a basis for incursion against Rwanda. These Hutu militia forces soon allied with the Zairian armed forces (FAZ) to launch a campaign against Congolese ethnic Tutsis in eastern Zaire. In turn, these Tutsis formed a militia to defend themselves against attacks.
The Tutsi militia was soon joined by various opposition groups and supported by several countries, including Rwanda and Uganda. This coalition, led by Laurent-Desire Kabila, became known as the Alliance des Forces Democratiques pour la Liberation du Congo-Zaire (AFDL). The AFDL, now seeking the broader goal of ousting Mobutu, made significant military gains in early 1997. Following failed peace talks between Mobutu and Kabila in May 1997, Mobutu left the country, and Kabila marched unopposed to Kinshasa on May 20. Kabila named himself president, consolidated power around himself and the AFDL, and reverted the name of the country to the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Kabila demonstrated little ability to manage the problems of his country. He lost his allies and the Mouvement pour la Liberation du Congo (MLC, led by the warlord Jean-Pierre Bemba)., backed by Rwandan and Ugandan troops attakced in August 1998, soon after Angola, Zimbabwe, Namibia sent some form of force into the DRC, with Zimbabwe and Angola supporting the government. While the six African governments involved in the war signed a ceasefire accord in Lusaka in July 1999, the Congolese rebels did not and the ceasefire broke down within months. Kabila was assassinated in January 2001 by one of his bodyguards, and was succeeded by his son Joseph. The conflict continued until February 2001 when a further peace deal was brokered between Kabila, Rwanda and Uganda leading to the apparent withdrawal of foreign troops. UN peacekeepers, MONUC, arrived in April 2001.
Currently the Ugandans and the MLC still hold a 200 mile wide section of the north of the country; Rwandan forces and its front, the Rassemblement Congolais pour la Democratie (RCD) control a large section of the east; and government forces or their allies hold the west and south of the country. There were reports that the conflict is being prolonged as a cover for extensive looting of the substantial natural resources in the country (including diamonds, copper, zinc, and coltan). The conflict was reignited in January 2002 by ethnic clashes in the northeast and both Uganda and Rwanda have halted their withdrawal and sent in more troops. Talks between Kabila and the rebel leaders (held in Sun City) are currently in their sixth week (April 2002).
- See also : Democratic Republic of the Congo
References
- Peter Forbath: The River Congo, Harper & Row, 1977. ISBN: 0-06-122490-1.
- Walter Rodney: How Europe underdeveloped Africa, Howard University Press, 1974. ISBN: 0-88258-013-2.
- Thomas Pakenham: The scramble for Africa, Abacus, 1991. ISBN: 0 349 10449 2.
- Richard Hall: Stanley: an adveturer explored, Purnell, 1974.
- "Reforming the Heart of Darkness" Concerning the Congo under Leopold II