User talk:Scott5114/Archive B

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KJBurns (talk | contribs) at 22:54, 31 May 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 19 years ago by KJBurns in topic Re: Re: Re: Infoboxes
Archive
Archives

This page has just been archived. Use the box at right to access the old discussions. ...Scott5114 19:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

thanks for the "heads up"

 
Thanks

about the E. W. Marland and William H. Murray issue. I ran into your "needs cleanup" posting yesterday at Marland and wandered over to your user page, but did not comment. However after getting your note today, moved the Murry stuff to its discussion page too. i left a not for this fellow on his blog page but have not heard back. Turns out that he's a Young Republican and even admitts it, so that explains a lot, to me, anyway. I have recently made a couple of interesting road trips through Oklahoma - one of which is leading to a nice [whooops, that's an opinion] article about the Pioneer Woman Statue in Ponca City. Life . . . . . . . . . . . ....... it's just a road trip- hopefully, a long one. Carptrash 19:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Michael J. Easley

Just FYI I've deleted it so you can fix the move :) -- Tawker 00:31, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikistory

We have started a sentence version Wikipedia:Sandbox/Wikistory (Sentence) - check it out! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oklahoma shield

File:Oklahoma 74B.svg

This fits the specs better than the actual sign :\ --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 22:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Jacksonville Public Library

Re: Copyright issue

I am the Webmaster of the site in question, and I also posted the Wikipedia article. I wrote the original article on the http://www.jacksonvillelibrary.com/history.htm page, and I have the Library Director's permission to re-post the library's history here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12:43, May 9, 2006 (talkcontribs) SamLowry

<references/>

As User:Ligulem points out, there is now a class="references-small" specification, which is preferred, as it allows all the references lists to have a consistant appearance, and so we can change them all at once, if need be. I've updated your userspace template accordingly, happy to help. Again, if you think the globally specified font-size is too big, too small, etc. You might engage the folks at the talk page. — May. 14, '06 [10:28] <freakofnurxture|talk>

P.S. Thanks for taking care of the Oklahoma pages. I've been doing Texas-cruft myself. — May. 14, '06 [10:33] <freakofnurxture|talk>

The death of OK-51C

Scott,

I live in Stillwater, and frequently make the trip from here to Oklahoma City either via OK-51 or US-177 & OK-33, then I-35. Sometime in 2005, all the signs for OK-51 disappeared, including junction signs and reassurance signs on the former highway. At the end of OK-51C, the signs directing traffic to EB/WB OK-51 remain, as they usually do when a state highway is realigned or decommissioned. The old alignment of US-177 through downtown Stillwater still retains navigation signs for OK-51, although (obviously) the navigation signs for US-177 have been moved to the new alignment.

Later, Kevin KJBurns 18:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

OK-108; Images

Scott,

I began the article of OK-108 this morning. It is a bit rough, with no links to cities, etc., but take a look when you get a chance and let me know what you think. Also, I made a minor modification to the OK-51 page: I added an inline image that I used in the OK-108 article. Let me know what you think.

Here are the images I have created thus far (original scale: 10px per inch):

File:Ok-33.PNG File:Ok-51.PNG File:Ok-108.PNG

~Kevin

Have a barnstar :)

 
I hearby award Scott5114 the Working Man's Barnstar for his tagging of numerous speedy delete articles. Thank you! --Fang Aili talk 20:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Infoboxes

Are you using 1 mi = 1.609 km for the conversion?

Re: Re: Re: Infoboxes

Wow... I knew it was 1.609344, which is what I use... I thought I was the only geek that put all 7 significant figures into the calculator :o)

Later, KJBurns 22:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply