Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperthinker

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Btwendel (talk | contribs) at 08:41, 12 June 2006 ([[Hyperthinker]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Prod tag removed. Given the user name of the creator, I think vanity applies. As far as the concept, most of the links I find point to blogs, so I'm not sure there is a notability claim either. cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete from google it looks almost like this might be an attempt at advertising Ydam 16:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Neo, ad. From links and google, it appears it's a title for seminars (You, too, can get rich by learning to be a hyperthinker). Fan1967 16:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete vanity. --Ben Houston 02:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Objection to deletion: This is an entry to define a new word. Is the fact that the word was invented by a business professional enough reason to block it? It does exist, doesn't it? More and more people are using it in their daily language. It does not advertise a product or a service. Can only not-professionals define & invent new words? Joost van de Loo, 10 June 2006
  • Keep since I do not see hyperthinker as vanity. There is a thin line between dictionary and encyclopedia, I do not see that either as a valid reason to delete this post. B Wendel 10:40. June 12 2006